ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Due to the obvious rise in the price of palm fruit in the international market, it is widely known that the oil palm plantation industry contributes to the recovery of the country's economy. One of the key factors for the stability of the Malaysian economy is the expansion of the palm oil sector. Low personality has become an issue that employees must address if they are to improve their performance. Low personality has become a problem that employees must deal with if they want to improve performance. Although this issue requires more attention, there are not enough studies on it, especially those that focus on regular workers in Malaysia's plantation industry. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to identify the level of personality, leadership behavior and job performance among plantation workers in Sarawak. The plantation industry in Sarawak, Malaysia will be the location of this study. For this study, 200 general workers from Sarawak's plantation industry were selected as respondents. The Mini-International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), Transformational Leadership, and the Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ) will be used for this study. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) using Statistical Package for Science and Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. The results of this study show that the level of personality, leadership behavior and job performance is high. The results of this study will serve as a guide to improve job performance, especially in the plantation industry of Malaysia. Therefore, it is advisable to expand the study population in future studies.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Bing, M. N., & Lounsbury, J. W. (2000). Openness and Job Performance in U.S.-Based Japanese Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(4), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022940519157
Buil, I., Martinez, E., & Matute, J. (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement, and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 64-75.
Burns, J. M. G. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2012). The Five-Factor Model, Five-Factor Theory, and Interpersonal Psychology. In L. M. Horowitz & S. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology: Theory, Research, Assessment, and Therapeutic Interventions (pp. 91–104). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118001868.ch6
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
Do, M. H., & Minbashian, A. (2020). Higher-order personality factors and leadership outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, 110058.
Effendi, H., Warjio, W., & Kariono, K. (2018). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Motivasi Dari Finansial, Psikologi, Dan Sosial Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Pegawai [The Influence of Motivational Factors from Financial, Psychological, and Social Aspects on Employee Performance]. Jurnal Administrasi Publik: Public Administration Journal, 7(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v7i1.1261
Haider, S. A., Akbar, A., Tehseen, S., Poulova, P., & Jaleel, F. (2022). The impact of responsible leadership on knowledge sharing behavior through the mediating role of person–organization fit and moderating role of higher educational institute culture. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100265.
Hakim, C. (2000). Research Design: Successful Designs for Social and Economic Research. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31720387_Research_Design_Successful_Designs_for_Social_and_Economic_Research_C_Hakim
Hj, A., Malek, M. D. (2016). Hubungan Di Antara Tekanan Kerja Dengan Tingkah Laku Jenis A Dan Kepuasan Kerja: Satu Kajian Ke Atas Pekerja Bank [The Relationship between Job Pressure, Type A Behavior, and Job Satisfaction: A Study on Bank Employees]. Jurnal Kinabalu, 22, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.51200/ejk.v4i0.375
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-Factor Model of Personality and Transformational Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.751
Lepine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00214.x
Mackey, J. D. (2021). Why and how predators pick prey: Followers’ personality and performance as predictors of destructive leadership. Journal of Business Research, 130, 159-169.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). The NEO Personality Inventory: Using the Five-Factor Model in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69(4), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1991.tb01524.x
Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. (1983). Retrieved November 2, 2022, from https://mkp.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/en/1983/02/28/perilaku-organisasi-konsep-dasar-dan-aplikasinya-2/
SAGE Reference - Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology - Volume 2: Organizational Psychology. (2009). In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Organizational Psychology (pp. 33-49). SAGE Publications. https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/hdbk_orgpsych2/n3.xml
Schoen, H., & Schumann, S. (2007). Personality Traits, Partisan Attitudes, and Voting Behavior. Evidence from Germany. Political Psychology, 28(4), 471–498. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20447059
Zali, Z. (2022). Mengenal Pasti Faktor Personaliti ‘Big Five’ terhadap Prestasi Pembelajaran: Satu Kajian Sistematik. Neliti. https://www.neliti.com/publications/530454/mengenal-pasti-faktor-personaliti-big-five-terhadap-prestasi-pembelajaran-satu
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006). The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259
N/A
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode