ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Flexible or multidimensional leadership practices can influence teachers in personalizing each
Vol 13, Issue 10, (2023) E-ISSN: 2222-6990
mission and vision to be achieved. This study explores and analyzes the multidimensional leadership of middle leaders and the relationship with commitment in the 25-transformation primary school (TS25) in the district of Seremban, Negeri Sembilan. The objective of the study is to identify the level of multidimensional leadership practices covering the aspects of structural, symbolic, human, and political leadership as well as to see the influence of their multidimensional leadership with a commitment to the organization of the primary school. The design of the study is a quantitative study that uses face-to-face and online survey methods. A sample of 201 middle leaders (Senior Assistant and Head of Committee) at 15 primary schools in Seremban district. The Leadership Orientation (LO) questionnaire is used to look at the multidimensional leadership practices of the leaders of the opposition and commitment. The findings show that middle leaders' multidimensional leadership practices are at a high level. According to the teacher's perception, the highest dimension of leadership is that human resource leadership is followed by cultural, political, and structural leadership. Overall, the findings show that the multidimensional leadership practices of middle leaders (r = 0.595, p < 0.01) have a significant relationship with the commitment to the organization in primary school TS25 Seremban district. The implication of the study is that teachers need exposure to multidimensional leadership practices so that there is a balance in the lead to help them make the right decisions based on situations that will positively impact school excellence. The results of the study can be concluded that the multidimensional leadership practices of teachers in primary schools in the Seremban district provide a single over the success and excellence of the school.
Aieman, A.A.M. (2013). Leadership Frame Preference Of Jordanian Schools’ Principals As
Perceived By Their Teachers: The Bolman And Deal Four Frames Model European.
Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2): 252 – 262.
Azmira, A., (2019). Amalan Kepimpinan Multidimensi Pengetua Dan Hubungan Dengan
Kepuasan Kerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Di Daerah Melaka Tengah, Melaka. Sumber: International Journal of Modern Trends in Social Sciences, 2(7)
Allen, N., dan Meyer, J. P. 2013. The measurement and antecedents of effective,continuance and normative commitment to organizations. Journal of Occupational Phychology, 63: 1-18.
Amalina Ibrahim, Fatimah Wati Halim, dan Wan Shahrazad Wan Sulaiman. (2017). Faktor-
faktor yang Mempengaruhi Komitmen Organisasi dalam Kalangan Guru Sekolah. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences (IRJES). eISSN 2550-2158. Vol. 1 Special Issue 1 (Malay), 2017.
Amin, S. (2018). Melangkah ke hadapan gerak kerja & fokus tumpuan KPPM 2018.
Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Azman, S. (2019). Coaching kepimpinan dalam pembangunan individu & organisasi. Modul
pembangunan profesionalisme kepimpinan sekolah. Diperoleh daripada https://www.yumpu.com/id/document/read/62852101/modul-coaching-kepimpinan
Bolman,L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1984). Leading and managing: Effects of context, culture, and
gender. Educatioal Administration Quarterly, 30(1), 77-96.
Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. (1991). Reframing Organizations. San Francisco: jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L. & Deal, T. (1991). Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frame, multi-sector analysis. Human Resource Management 30(4): 509-534.
Bolman, L. & Deal, T. (1997). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bolman, L., Bloch, H., & Granell, E. (1999). Versatile leadership: A comparative analysis of
reframing in Venezuelan managers. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di Persidangan World Wide Bilingual di Universiti Madrid, Sepanyol. http: www.bloch.ukmc.edu/classes/bolman. html [ 19 Oktober 2004] Bolman, L. G. & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice and Leadership. Edisi ke-3. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Castiglia, B. (2006). The impact of cahanging culture in higher education on the person-
organization fit, job satisfaction and organizational commitment of college faculty. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 10(2): 23-44
Cheng, Y.C. (2005). New Paradigm for Re-engineering Education: Globalization, Localization, and Individualization. Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association. Netherlands: Springer.
Fleming, P. (2000) Buku Pembangunan pemimpin pertengahan Published by Redzuan5236,
2020-09-17 02:11:38., The art of middle management in secondary schools: a guide to effective subject and team leadership: David Fulton Publisher, New York
Fullan. (2001); Deal dan Peterson. (2000) & Abdul Shukor Abdullah. (2004). The change
leader. Educational Leadership 50(8): 15-20.
Gliddon, David G. (2006). Forecasting a Competency Model for Innovation LeadersUsing a
Modified Delphi Technique. A Thesis in Workforce Education and Development, The Pennsylvania State University.
Heissenberger, P. dan Heilbronner, N. (2017). The Influence of Primary School Principals’
Leadership Styles on Innovative Practices. Global Education Review 4(4): 86-101.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2009). Standard Guru Malaysia. Bahagian Pendidikan Guru
(BPG). Putrajaya.
Kompas (2009), Kompetensi Pemimpin Sekolah Malaysia, Institut Aminuddin Baki,
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Laporan tahunan 2018 Pelan Pembangunan
Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016) 635-646. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. In
Hill, R. (1998). “What Sample Size Is ‘Enough’ In Internet Survey Research?” Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An electronic Journal for the 21st Century. Available at: http://www.emoderators.com/ipct-j/1998/n3-4/hill.hmtl.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of
organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61 – 89.
Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in The Workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
Thompson, M.D. (2005). Organizational climate perception and job element satisfaction: A
multi-frame application in a higher education setting. E-Journal of Organizational Learning and Leadership 4(1). Akses di http://www.leadingtoday.org/weleadinglearning/ mt05.htm.
(Ramli & Hamzah, 2023)
Ramli, Z., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2023). Multidimensional Leadership and Its Relationship with Intermediate Leader Commitment in Transformation Primary School 2025 (TS25) in Seremban. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(10), 486–498.
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode