Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Exploring the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction During Open and Distance Learning among Sports Students

Muhammad Irfan Aiman Ithnin, Wahidah Tumijan, Rozita Abdul Latif, Hasmiza Abdul Majeed, Azman Ahmad Tajri, Yusuf Hidayat, Burhan Hambali

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i10/19104

Open access

Student satisfaction with online education has been extensively studied and is significantly linked with students' performance. Examining student satisfaction in online settings is sensible, as new technologies have altered how students interact with the learning environment. Aim: This study investigates the relationship between self-efficacy and student satisfaction during open and distance learning (ODL) contexts among sports students. Methods: The study participants comprised 97 students from the Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation (FSR) at UiTM Seremban. The self-efficacy and satisfaction of the sports students were assessed in this study using the adapted questionnaire of self-efficacy and satisfaction (Shen et al., 2013; (Artino, 2007); Alqurashi, 2019). Results: It was reported that the respondents' self-efficacy was within the range of moderate confidence can do to highly confident can do (mean=3.77, SD=0.55). The results also indicate that the students agree with satisfaction perceived online learning (mean=3.63, SD=0.74). It was also found that there is a significant relationship between self-efficacy and students' satisfaction. The self-efficacy towards student satisfaction among sports students was moderately correlated (r (97) = 0.490, p<0.001). Conclusion: The present study ascertains the relationship between self-efficacy and students' satisfaction with open and distance learning (ODL) among sports students at UiTM.

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x
Akyol, Z. (2012). Educational communities of inquiry: theoretical framework, research and practice:Theoretical framework, research and practice. IGI Global. https:// doi. org/ 10. 4018/978-1- 4666- 2110-7
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015). Exploring the factors that affect student satisfaction through using E-learning in Malaysian higher education institutions. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4S1), 299– 310. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s1p299
Alavi, M., Marakas, G. M., & Yoo, Y. (2002). A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.4.404.72
Aldhahi, M. I., Alqahtani, A. S., Baattaiah, B. A., & Al-Mohammed, H. I. (2022). Exploring the relationship between students' learning satisfaction and self-efficacy during the emergency transition to remote learning amid the coronavirus pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 1323-1340.
Ali, A., Ramay, M. I., & Shahzad, M. (2011). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University (AIOU) Islamabad, Pakistan. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.10766
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Distance education enrollment report 2017 infographics. Medical Teacher, 2011(June), 2013. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017. pdf%0Ahttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24989616%0Ahttp://www.scopus. com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0 84861555349&partnerID=40&md5=090eefe34b565d78d45cf0d83c19751a
Alqurashi, E. (2016). Self-efficacy in online learning environments: A literature review. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 9(1), 45–52.
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
Artino Jr, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191.
Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Shea, P., Pelz, W., & Swan, K. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with online courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 4(2), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1899
Gunawardena, C. N., et al. (2010). Predictors of learner satisfaction and transfer of learning in a corporate online education program. The American Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 207–226. https://doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 08923 647. 2010. 522919
Kaminski, K., Switzer, J., & Gloeckner, G. (2009). Workforce readiness: A study of
university students' fluency with information technology. Computers and Education, 53(2), 228–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.017
Kim, L. E., Dar-Nimrod, I., & MacCann, C. (2018). Teacher personality and teacher effectiveness in secondary school: Personality predicts teacher support and student self-efficacy but not academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(3), 309. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1037/ edu00 00217
Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35– 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
Kuo, Y., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs | Kuo | The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 15–39. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1338/2416
Lee, J.-K., & Hwang, C.-Y. (2007) The effects of computer self-efficacy and learning management system quality on e-learner's satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 2007 European LAMS Conference: Designing the Future of Learning (pp. 73–79).
Lewis, L., & Parsad, B. (2009). Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Distance Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions?: 2006 – 07.
Moore, B. J. C., & Moore, J. C. (2005). Mework and the Five Pillars.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
Nigel Lindemann. (2021). What's The Average Survey Response Rate? [2021 Benchmark]. Survey Any Place Blog. https://surveyanyplace.com/blog/average- survey-response-rate/
Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online Technologies Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning as Predictors of Final Grade and Satisfaction in College-Level Online Courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024
Prifti, R. (2022). Self–efficacy and student satisfaction in the context of blended learning courses. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 37(2), 111-125.
Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001
Erman Yukselturk, & Zahide Yildirim. (2008). Investigation of Interaction, Online Support,
urse Structure and Flexibility as the Contributing Factors to Students' Satisfaction in an Online Certificate Program. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 51–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.4.

N/A