Investigating Aesthetic Preferences in Wearable Devices via the Unified Model of Aesthetics: A Review

Adapa, A., Nah, F. F.-H., Hall, R. H., Siau, K., & Smith, S. N. (2018). Factors influencing the adoption of smart wearable devices. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(5), 399-409.
Alcaide-Marzal, J., Diego-Mas, J. A., & Acosta-Zazueta, G. (2020). A 3D shape generative method for aesthetic product design. Design Studies, 66, 144-176.
Aroganam, G., Manivannan, N., & Harrison, D. (2019). Review on wearable technology sensors used in consumer sport applications. Sensors, 19(9), 1983.
Aspers, P., & Godart, F. (2013). Sociology of fashion: Order and change. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 171-192.
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396.
Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological science, 17(8), 645-648.
Baskerville, R. L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V. C. (2018). Aesthetics in design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), 140-153.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (2017). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Interpersonal development, 57-89.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
Berghman, M., & Hekkert, P. (2017). Towards a unified model of aesthetic pleasure in design. New Ideas in Psychology, 47, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.004
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity [doi:10.1037/11164-000]. McGraw-Hill Book Company. https://doi.org/10.1037/11164-000
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Curiosity and Exploration: Animals spend much of their time seeking stimuli whose significance raises problems for psychology. Science, 153(3731), 25-33.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & psychophysics, 8(5), 279-286.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology, New York: Appleton Century
Crofts.
Berlyne, D. E. (1972). Uniformity in variety: Extension to three-element visual patterns and non-verbal measures. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 26, 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082436
Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Hemisphere.
Berlyne, D. E., & Boudewijns, W. J. (1971). Hedonic effects of uniformity in variety. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 25, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082381
Bettels, J., & Wiedmann, K.-P. (2019). Brand logo symmetry and product design: The spillover effects on consumer inferences. Journal of Business Research, 97, 1-9.
Bettencourt, B., & Sheldon, K. (2001). Social roles as mechanism for psychological need satisfaction within social groups. Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(6), 1131.
Biederman, I., & Vessel, E. A. (2006). Perceptual pleasure and the brain: A novel theory explains why the brain craves information and seeks it through the senses. American scientist, 94(3), 247-253.
Blijlevens, J., & Hekkert, P. P. M. (2014). Influence of social connectedness and autonomy on aesthetic pleasure for product designs. Proceedings of the 23rd Biennial Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics, 22-24 augustus 2014, New York, USA., IAEA.
Blijlevens, J., & Hekkert, P. P. M. (2015). " Autonomous, yet connected": A social design principle explaining consumers' aesthetic appreciation of products. 2015 academy of marketing conference-the magic in marketing (pp. 1-8). The Academy of Marketing.
Brattico, E., Brattico, P., & Jacobsen, T. (2009). The origins of the aesthetic enjoyment of music — A review of the literature. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2_suppl), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864909013002031
Brewer. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
Burnap, A., Hauser, J. R., & Timoshenko, A. (2021). Design and evaluation of product aesthetics: A human-machine hybrid approach. Available at SSRN 3421771.
Ceballos, L. M., Hodges, N. N., & Watchravesringkan, K. (2019). The MAYA principle as applied to apparel products: The effects of typicality and novelty on aesthetic preference. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal.
Ching, K. W., & Singh, M. M. (2016). Wearable Technology Devices Security and Privacy Vulnerability Analysis. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications, 8(3), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnsa.2016.8302
Choi, J., & Kim, S. (2016). Is the smartwatch an IT product or a fashion product? A study on factors affecting the intention to use smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 777-786.
Chow, H.-W., & Yang, C.-C. (2020). Accuracy of optical heart rate sensing technology in wearable fitness trackers for young and older adults: Validation and comparison study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(4), e14707.
Christensen, B. T., Kristensen, T., & Reber, R. (2015). Contributions of consumer-perceived creativity and beauty to willingness-to-pay for design products. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3(3-4), 164-176.
Chuah, S. H. W., Rauschnabel, P. A., Krey, N., Nguyen, B., Ramayah, T., & Lade, S. (2016). Wearable technologies: The role of usefulness and visibility in smartwatch adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 276-284.
Chunyan, Q., & Hu, Y. (2015). The review of smart clothing design research based on the concept of 3F+ 1I. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(1).
Cupchik, G. C., Spiegel, S., & Shereck, L. (1996). Unity in the diversity of aesthetic response. Visual Arts Research, 1-10.
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection (Vol. 247, p. 1859). EA Weeks.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Dehghani, M., & Kim, K. J. (2019). The effects of design, size, and uniqueness of smartwatches: perspectives from current versus potential users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1143-1153.
Dittmar, H. (1992). The social psychology of material possessions: To have is to be. Palgrave MacMillan.
Eskenazi, A., Maneva, N., & Ivanova, K. (2021). Computer Science Research—Unity in Variety. In Research in Computer Science in the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (pp. 7-22). Springer.
Eysenck, H. J. (1942). The experimental study of the'good Gestalt'—a new approach. Psychological Review, 49(4), 344.
Eysenck, H. J. (1968). An Experimental Study of Aesthetic Preference for Polygonal Figures. The Journal of General Psychology, 79(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1968.9710447
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Preschool of aesthetics. Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig.
Freitas, A. L., Azizian, A., Travers, S., & Berry, S. A. (2005). The evaluative connotation of processing fluency: Inherently positive or moderated by motivational context? Journal of experimental social psychology, 41(6), 636-644.
Graham, L. (2008). Gestalt theory in interactive media design. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(1).
Guo, F., Li, M., Hu, M., Li, F., & Lin, B. (2019). Distinguishing and quantifying the visual aesthetics of a product: an integrated approach of eye-tracking and EEG. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 71, 47-56.
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design. Psychology science, 48(2), 157.
Hekkert, P. (2014). Aesthetic responses todesign: a battle of impulses. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts (pp. 277-299). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139207058.015
Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product aesthetics. Product experience, 259-285.
Hekkert, P., Snelders, D., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (2003). ‘Most advanced, yet acceptable’: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. . British journal of Psychology.
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02374.x]. British journal of Psychology, 81(4), 483-495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02374.x
Hsu, F. R., Kuo, Y.-H., Wei, S.-Y., Hsieh, Y.-H., & Nguyen, D. C. (2019). A study of user interface with wearable devices based on computer vision. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 9(1), 43-48.
Hung, W. K., & Chen, L. L. (2012). Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design. International Journal of Design, 6(2), 81-90.
Iftikhar, H., Shah, P., & Luximon, Y. (2019). Exploring the balance between utilitarian and hedonic values of wearable products. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics,
Johnson, K. K., Yoo, J.-J., Kim, M., & Lennon, S. J. (2008). Dress and human behavior: A review and critique. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 26(1), 3-22.
Kahn, B. E. (1995). Consumer variety-seeking among goods and services: An integrative review. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2(3), 139-148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-6989(95)00038-0
Keum, K., Kim, J. W., Hong, S. Y., Son, J. G., Lee, S. S., & Ha, J. S. (2020). Flexible/stretchable supercapacitors with novel functionality for wearable electronics. Advanced Materials, 32(51), 2002180.
Kim, N. (2006). A history of design theory in art education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 40(2), 12-28.
Kleine III, R. E., Kleine, S. S., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Mundane consumption and the self: A social?identity perspective. Journal of consumer psychology, 2(3), 209-235.
Koo, S., & Chae, Y. (2022). Wearable Technology in Fashion. In Leading Edge Technologies in Fashion Innovation: Product Design and Development Process from Materials to the End Products to Consumers (pp. 35-57). Springer.
Krey, N., Chuah, S. H.-W., Ramayah, T., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2019). How functional and emotional ads drive smartwatch adoption: The moderating role of consumer innovativeness and extraversion. Internet Research.
Kumar, M., & Garg, N. (2010). Aesthetic principles and cognitive emotion appraisals: How much of the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder? Journal of consumer psychology, 20(4), 485-494.
Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 603-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1088
Lee, E.-J. (2020). Gender influence in the effect of design aesthetics on perceived product value of wearables. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology (IJACT), 8(2), 129-138.
Lee, E. J. (2021). Impact of visual typicality on the adoption of wearables. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 762-775.
Lee, L.-H., & Hui, P. (2018). Interaction methods for smart glasses: A survey. IEEE access, 6, 28712-28732.
Lin, K.-Y., Chien, C.-F., & Kerh, R. (2016). UNISON framework of data-driven innovation for extracting user experience of product design of wearable devices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99, 487-502.
Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Marty, T. (2013). Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden? Biological Conservation, 159, 37-44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011
Liu, F., Zhu, Z., Chen, H., & Li, X. (2020). Beauty in the eyes of its beholders: Effects of design novelty on consumer preference. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101969
Logkizidou, M. (2021). The neglected unity-in-variety principle: A holistic rather than a single-factor approach in conceptualising a visual merchandise display. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 12(4), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2021.1930097
Loken, B., & Ward, J. (1990). Alternative approaches to understanding the determinants of typicality. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 111-126.
Loos, S., Wolk, S. v. d., Graaf, N. d., Hekkert, P., & Wu, J. (2022). Towards intentional aesthetics within topology optimization by applying the principle of unity-in-variety. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65(7), 185.
Lynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self?uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861-1883.
Malt, B. C., & Smith, E. E. (1982). The role of familiarity in determining typicality. Memory & Cognition, 10(1), 69-75.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224.
Mehrabadi, M. A., Azimi, I., Sarhaddi, F., Axelin, A., Niela-Vilén, H., Myllyntausta, S., Stenholm, S., Dutt, N., Liljeberg, P., & Rahmani, A. M. (2020). Sleep tracking of a commercially available smart ring and smartwatch against medical-grade actigraphy in everyday settings: instrument validation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(11), e20465.
Mencarini, E., Rapp, A., Tirabeni, L., & Zancanaro, M. (2019). Designing wearable systems for sports: a review of trends and opportunities in human–computer interaction. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 49(4), 314-325.
Moore, K. M. (1986). Perceptual Determinants of Aesthetic Unity. Dissertation.
Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2012). Newer is better! The influence of a novel appearance on the perceived performance quality of products. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(6), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.618802
Muller, C., & Klerk, N. D. (2020). Influence of Design Aesthetics and Brand Name On Generation Y Students’ Intention to Use Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 12(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.34111/ijebeg.202012202
Nadal, M., Munar, E., Marty, G., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2010). Visual Complexity and Beauty Appreciation: Explaining the Divergence of Results. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.d
O’Neal, G., Fiore, A., & Kimle, P. (1997). African-American aesthetics of dress. Understanding aesthetics for the merchandising and design professional, 108-109.
Ouverson, K., Kelly, N., & Gilbert, S. B. (2017). Fashion and technology: Implications for the social acceptability of a wearable device. Human-Computer Interaction. User Interface Design, Development and Multimodality: 19th International Conference, HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 19,
Pateman, M., Harrison, D., Marshall, P., & Cecchinato, M. E. (2018). The role of aesthetics and design: wearables in situ. Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
Peake, J. M., Kerr, G., & Sullivan, J. P. (2018). A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations. Front Physiol, 9, 743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00743
Perry, A. (2018). Exploring from creators’ perspectives issues and solutions about knowledge, difficulties, and disposal in making smart clothing designs. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(1), 129-137.
Perry, A., Malinin, L., Sanders, E., Li, Y., & Leigh, K. (2017). Explore consumer needs and design purposes of smart clothing from designers’ perspectives. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 10(3), 372-380.
Person, O., & Snelders, D. (2011). Initial findings on design and product category expertise in aesthetic evaluation. Nordes, (4).
Post, R., Nguyen, T., & Hekkert, P. (2017). Unity in Variety in website aesthetics: A systematic inquiry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103, 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.003
Post, R. A., Blijlevens, J., & Hekkert, P. (2016). 'To preserve unity while almost allowing for chaos': Testing the aesthetic principle of unity-in-variety in product design. Acta Psychol (Amst), 163, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.013
Post, R. A. G., Blijlevens, J., & Hekkert, P. (2013, August). The influence of unity-in-variety on aesthetic appreciation of car interiors. Consilience and innovation in design: proceedings of the 5th international congress of international association of societies of design research. Tokyo: Shibaura Institute of Technology, (pp. 1-6).
Post, R. A. G., Blijlevens, J., & Hekkert, P. (2014, August). Aesthetic appreciation of tactile unity-in-variety in product designs. 23rd Biennial Congress of the international association of empirical aesthetics, (pp. 358-360).
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. ournal of consciousness Studies, 6(6-7), 15-51.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and social psychology review, 8(4), 364-382.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2008). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago press.
Rosch. (1978). Cognition and categorization.
Schüll, N. D. (2016). Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11(3), 317-333. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2015.47
Silvera, D. H., Josephs, R. A., & Giesler, R. B. (2002). Bigger is better: The influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(3), 189-202.
Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), 25-42.
Sohn, K., & Kwon, O. (2020). Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial Intelligence-based intelligent products. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101324.
Suhaimi, S. N. (2021). Investigating the Significance of Typicality and Novelty in the Aesthetic Preference of Industrial Products.
Suhaimi, S. N., Kuys, B., Barron, D., Li, N., Rahman, Z., & Whitfield, A. (2023). Probing the extremes of aesthetics: The role of typicality and novelty in the aesthetic preference of industrial boilers. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 41(1), 216-230.
Talke, K., Müller, S., & Wieringa, J. E. (2017). A matter of perspective: Design newness and its performance effects. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(2), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.01.001
Tan, S.-L., & Spackman, M. P. (2005). Listeners’ judgments of the musical unity of structurally altered and intact musical compositions. Psychology of Music, 33(2), 133-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735605050648
Tehrani, K., & Michael, A. (2014). Wearable technology and wearable devices: Everything you need to know. Wearable Devices Magazine, 26.
Thurgood, C., Hekkert, P., & Blijlevens, J. (2014, January). The Joint Effect of Typicality and Novelty on Aesthetic Pleasure for Product
Designs: Influences of Safety and Risk. Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics.
Toufani, S., Stanton, J. P., & Chikweche, T. (2017). The importance of aesthetics on customers’ intentions to purchase smartphones. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(3), 316-338.
Truong, Y., Klink, R. R., Fort?Rioche, L., & Athaide, G. A. (2014). Consumer response to product form in technology?based industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 867-876.
Tyagi, S. (2017). The influence of individual elements on the aesthetic pleasure of furniture designs.
Tyagi, S., Thurgood, C., & Whitfield, T. A. (2013). Unravelling Novelty. Consilience and Innovation in Design: Proc of the 5th IASDR Conf. Tokyo.
Veryzer, J. Robert W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1998). The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 374-385. https://doi.org/10.1086/209516
Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychol Bull, 138(6), 1172-1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029333
Wang, J., & Hsu, Y. (2020). The relationship of symmetry, complexity, and shape in mobile interface aesthetics, from an emotional perspective—A case study of the smartwatch. Symmetry, 12(9), 1403.
Whitfield, T. W., & Wiltshire, T. J. (1990). Color psychology: A critical review. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116, 385-411.
Whitfield, T. W. A. (1983). Predicting preference for familiar, everyday objects: An experimental confrontation between two theories of aesthetic behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(3), 221-237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80002-4
Whitfield, T. W. A., & Slatter, P. E. (1979). The effects of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb02144.x]. British journal of Psychology, 70(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1979.tb02144.x
Woodburn, M., Paul, D. L., Addink, W., Baskauf, S. J., Blum, S., Chapman, C., Grant, S., Groom, Q., Jones, J., & Petersen, M. (2020). Unity in Variety: Developing a collection description standard by consensus. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 4, e59233.
Workman, J. E., & Caldwell, L. F. (2007). Centrality of visual product aesthetics, tactile and uniqueness needs of fashion consumers. International Journal of consumer studies, 31(6), 589-596.
Wu, P.-H., & Kao, D. T. (2011). Goal orientation and variety seeking behavior: The role of decision task. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.005
Xue, J. (2019). An investigation into the effects of product design on incremental and radical innovations from the perspective of consumer perceptions: evidence from China. Creativity and innovation management, 28(4), 501-518.
Yahaya, M. F. (2017). Investigating typicality and novelty through visual and tactile stimuli. (Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne).
Yang, Z., Yahaya, M. F., Ishak, S. M. M., & Qiao, Y. (2021). MAKING TRADITIONAL TRENDING: THE STUDY ON FAMILIARITY AND LIKINGS IN PROMOTING CULTURAL AWARENESS. International Journal on Sustainable Tropical Design Research & Practice, 14(2).
Yoo, J., & Kim, M. (2014). The effects of home page design on consumer responses: Moderating role of centrality of visual product aesthetics. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 240-247.

N/A

Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode