ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The talent pool of today's educational institutions specifically polytechnics and community colleges face an evolving landscape of leadership demands. This paper explores the pivotal role of personality tests based on the Big Five Personality model in enhancing leadership selection processes. The study underscores a distinctive arrangement of personality traits predisposing individuals to either strategic (EOANC) or operational (OEANC) leadership styles. Strategic leaders, characterized by Extraversion and Openness, are primed for roles that require visionary thinking and stakeholder engagement. In contrast, operational leaders, with a predilection for Openness balanced with other traits, are aptly suited for roles demanding meticulous planning and execution. By leveraging these insights, institutions can foster a leadership cadre that aligns seamlessly with their unique challenges and objectives. Furthermore, the paper recommends customizing personality tests for educational leadership, ensuring a harmonious balance between personality insights and practical expertise, periodically reviewing the tests' efficacy and investing in post-selection training. Ethical and transparent implementation of these tests further augments their efficacy and foster trust within the academic community. In conclusion, incorporating tailored personality tests in leadership selection can empower polytechnics and community colleges to navigate the complexities of modern education which further driving sustained institutional excellence.
Aguinis, H. (2019). Performance management. Chicago, IL: Chicago Business Press.
Anderson, L. A., & Anderson, D. (2010). The change leader's roadmap: How to navigate your organization's transformation (Vol. 384). John Wiley & Sons.
Antonakis, J., & Day, D. V. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of leadership. Sage publications.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1?2), 9-30.
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Free Press.
Bolman, L. G., & Gallos, J. V. (2011). Reframing academic leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901.
Davies, B. J., & Davies*, B. (2004). Strategic leadership. School leadership & management, 24(1), 29-38.
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581-613.
Day, D. V. (2011). Integrative perspectives on longitudinal investigations of leader development: From childhood through adulthood. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 561-571.
Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. (2019). See sooner, act faster: How vigilant leaders thrive in an era of digital turbulence. Mit Press.
DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta?analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7-52.
Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta?analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: Examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40.
Furnham, A. (2017). Personality tests as predictors of performance. In The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing, 2, 721-736.
Gallardo-Gallardo, E., & Collings, D. G. (2021). Talent management for the future of work. In New directions in the future of work (pp. 35-54). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Hogan, R., & Holland, B. (2003). Using theory to evaluate personality and job-performance relations: A socioanalytic perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 100.
Hughes, R. L., Beatty, K. M., & Dinwoodie, D. (2013). Becoming a strategic leader: Your role in your organization's enduring success. John Wiley & Sons.
Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating competitive advantage through streams of innovation. Business Horizons, 50(1), 49-59.
Ismail, M., Mohamed, H. A. B., Sulaiman, A. Z., Mohamad, M. H. S., & Yusuf, M. H. (2011). An empirical study of the relationship between transformational leadership, empowerment and organizational commitment. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(1), 89.
Jones, G. R., & Hill, C. W. (2022). Contemporary Management. McGraw-Hill Education.
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 765-780.
Kekäle, J. (2018). Proactive strategic recruitment in research groups. Tertiary Education and Management, 24, 144-153.
Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta?analysis of person?job, person?organization, person?group, and person?supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281-342.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 139-153.
Omar, M. S., Aziz, S. F. A., & Salleh, N. M. (2020). Factors affecting job satisfaction among academic employees in polytechnic. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(11), 209-216.
Pulakos, E. D. (2005). Selection assessment methods. Society for Human Resource Management.
Rivera, L. A. (2019). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999-1022.
Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 693-717.
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., & Tauriz, G. (2020). The validity of ipsative and Likert scales in personnel selection: Still an unresolved question. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(4), 527-540.
Zaccaro, S. J., Green, J. P., Dubrow, S., & Kolze, M. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 2-43.
Zhang, Z., & Arvey, R. D. (2009). Rule breaking in adolescence and entrepreneurial status: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 436-447.
N/A
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode