ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The integration of Web 2.0 technologies, particularly Social Networking Sites (SNS), in Malaysian secondary classrooms has gained significant attention in recent years as it is expected to exert a substantial impact on both teaching and learning. With its emphasis on independent learning, active involvement, and connectivity among learners, Web 2.0 realigns traditional teaching methods. The use of Web 2.0 tools in ESL classrooms has been the subject of numerous research. Thus, inquiring about the benefits of Web 2.0 in teaching English in Malaysian Secondary Schools is necessary. This research proposal details the research methodology, instruments, analysis procedures, and expected outcomes. The methodology involves a quantitative approach encompassing surveys as the primary data collection method. Surveys will be administered to students to gather quantitative data, which will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. The expected outcomes include a clear understanding of the benefits and challenges of Web 2.0 integration in Malaysian secondary school ELT from a quantitative perspective, the development of a practical framework for educators based on quantitative findings, and the recommendation of pedagogical strategies tailored to the Malaysian ESL classroom environment grounded in quantitative data. The research questions are grounded in two fundamental variables: exploring the benefits of Web 2.0 tools in language learning and examining how pedagogical approaches can effectively integrate Web 2.0 into ESL classrooms, considering the varying proficiency levels of learners. Ultimately, this research aims to contribute valuable quantitative insights for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders in the field, facilitating the effective utilization of Web 2.0 technologies to enhance the quality of English language instruction in Malaysian secondary schools.
Annamalai, N. (2019). The Use of Web 2.0 Technology Tools and beyond in Enhancing Task Based Language Learning: A Case Study. The English Teacher. 48 (1), 29-44.
Avelino, N. M., & Ismail, H. H. (2021). Assessing ESL Teachers’ Knowledge and Readiness in
Integrating 4IR into Teaching Practices: A Concept Paper. Creative Education, 12,
2038-2055. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.129156
Al-Maroof, R. S., Alshurideh, M. T., Salloum, S. A., AlHamad, A. Q. M., & Gaber, T. (2021).
Acceptance of Google Meet during the Spread of Coronavirus by Arab University Students. Informatics, 8, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020024
Almekhlafy, A., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2016). Mobile-mediated communication a tool for language
exposure in EFL informal learning settings. Arab World English Journal 7(1): 388-407.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804018
Aminin, S., Huda, M., Ninsiana, W., Dacholfany, M.I., 2018. Sustaining civic-based moral values: insights from language learning and literature. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 9 (4), 157–174.
Arabaci, I. B., & Akilli, C. (2021). English Teachers' Views on the Use of Web 2.0 Tools in
Educational Environments. Asian Journal of Education and Training 7(2): 115-125. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2021.72.115.125
Bauder, M. (2017). Using social media as a big data source for research: the example of ambient geospatial information (AGI) in tourism geography. In: Geographies of Digital Culture. Routledge, pp. 39–51
Chang, C. H., Wu, B. S. (2018). Teaching geography with technology—a critical commentary. In: Learning Geography Beyond the Traditional Classroom. Springer, Singapore, pp. 35–47.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Halim, A., & Harwati, H. (2019). Integrating web 2.0 technology in ESL classroom: A review on the benefits and barriers. Journal of Counseling and Educational Technology, 2(2), 1-08. http://journal.redwhitepress.com/index.php/jcet/index
Hashim, H., Yunus, M. M., Embi, M. A., & Mohamed Ozira, N. A. (2017). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for ESL learners: A review of affordances and constraints. Sains Humanika, 9(1-5), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1175
Jarrah, M. A., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2021). Arab Postgraduates’ Readiness towards and Effectiveness of Utilizing Web 2.0 in Language Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 673-690.
https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14141a
Jimoyiannis, A. 2010. Integrating Web 2.0 in education: Towards a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. In R. Hackney & C. Evans (Eds.), Web 2.0 Conference Abstracts (p. 5). Brunel University, London
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Bennett, S., et al. 2007. The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore. (pp. 517-525). http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/kennedy.pdf
Leh, F.C., Anduroh, A., & Huda, M. 2021. Level of knowledge, skills and attitude of trainee teachers on Web 2.0 applications in teaching geography in Malaysia schools.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08568
Malaysia Education Blueprint (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Education, 27, 1-268.
Malaymail. (2019). Maszlee: E-learning to be platform to raise English proficiency.
https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/08/01/maszlee-e-learning-to-be-platform-to-raise-english-proficiency/1776704
Nakamaru, S. (2011). Making (and not making) connections with web 2.0 technology in the ESL
composition classroom. National Council of Teachers of English; 38 (4): 377-390.
http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/TETYC/0384-may2011/
TETYC0384Making.pdf.
Perez. E. (2019). What Is Data Analysis and Its Methods. Utree. https://www.utreee.com/what-is-data-
analysis-and-its-methods%EF%BB%BF
Shih, R. C. (2010). Blended learning using video-based blogs: Public speaking for English as second language students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 26(6), 883-897.
http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/shih.html
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age.
http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Sturm, M., Kennell, T., McBride, R., & Kelly, M. 2009. The pedagogical implications of Web 2.0. In M. Thomas (Ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning (pp. 367-384). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., Hoi, C.K.W., 2019. Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: a Chinese perspective. Interact. Learn. Environ. 27(4), 530–546.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on
Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-
5915.2008.00192.x
Waycott, J. & Kennedy, G. 2009. Mobile and Web 2.0 technologies in undergraduate science:
Situating learning in everyday experience. In Same places, different spaces. Proceedings asciliteAuckland. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/waycott.pdf
N/A
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode