ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This article examines how Islamic legal principles are used in Malaysia to declare talak outside of court. This article's goal is to outline the Islamic legal principles that judges find most persuasive when deciding divorce cases. In order to analyse the role of preferred Islamic legal maxims as an argument in Islamic law and to investigate the position of the writing of judgement in Islam, the notion of divorce was investigated to see preferred Islamic legal maxims as an essential part in the submission of each case. The two main procedures used in this study, data collecting and data analysis, were based on a qualitative approach. In the Malaysian states of Kedah and Kelantan, information was obtained over the course of four months in 2017 through document analysis and interviews. In order to learn more about the use of preferred Islamic legal maxims in judgements and the practise of judgement writing in divorce cases in Malaysia, two academicians and four legal practitioners were interviewed for this study. This study also looked at the position and significance of judgement writing in Islamic law. The content analysis method was used to analyse the data. The respondents' documents were analysed using this technique in order to gather specific data on how to apply the desired Islamic legal maxims in divorce cases. The study's findings imply that when dealing with Shariah cases, decisions and supporting arguments often rely heavily on legal maxims. Al-Qur'an and al-Sunnah must be paralleled by the preferred Islamic legal maxims, which contain the Maqasid al-Shariah values. It is hoped that society may entrust Maqasid al-Shariah with handling divorce cases given the frequency of family issues today. Collaboration between Shariah judges and solicitors’ aids in creating novel elements incorporating both religious and legal considerations. Islamic legal principles will increasingly be used, and this will have a significant impact on institutional and religious courts, particularly Shariah Courts at the national level. The purpose of this application is to clear up any misunderstandings between the parties concerned and the Muslim community as a whole.
Al-Quran Al-Karim
Ismail, A. R. (2007). “Aplikasi Kaedah Fiqh M? L? Yudrak Kulluh L? Yutrak Julluh Dalam Mengklasifikasi Saham-Saham Patuh Syariah di Bursa Malaysia”. Disertasi Ijazah Sarjana, Fakulti Pengajian Islam. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Diah, M. A. H. (1987). Suatu Contoh Tentang Huraian Metodologi. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Al-Qarafi, A. I. (2007). Kit?b al-Fur?q: Anw?r al-Fur?q fi Anw?’ al-Fur?q. j. 1, c. 2, Kaherah: Dar al-Salam.
Omar, A. F. (1999). “Kaedah Fiqhiyyah dan Hubungkaitnya Dengan Permasalahan Fiqh Semasa”. Disertasi Ijazah Sarjana Fakulti Pengajian Islam. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Yaqin, A. (2007). Legal research writing. Malaysia: LexisNexis.
Enakmen. (2014). Enakmen Keterangan Mahkamah Syariah (Kedah Darul Aman).
Enakmen. (2008). Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam (Kedah Darul Aman).
Barnadib, I. (1982). Arti Dan Metode Sejarah Pendidikan, Yogyakarta: Yayasan Penerbitan FIP-IKIP.
Al-Suyuti, J. D. (1983). al-Asyb?h wa al-Naz?’ir fi Qaw?’id wa furu’ al-Sy?fi’?yyah. Beirut: D?r Al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah.
Koentjaraningrat. (1986). Metode-metode Penelitian Masyarakat. Jakarta: Penerbit P.T. Gramedia
Lee, M. P. (2011). Business Law. Oxford University Press. Selangor.
Zahraa, M. (1998). Research methods for law postgraduates’ overseas students.Univision: Glasgow.
Yaacob, M. A. (2013). “Hubungkait Antara Konsep Ihtiyat Dan Kaedah Fiqh Idh? D?qa al-Amr Ittassa’ Dari Perspektif Mazhab Syafie Dalam Permasalahan Ibadat”. Master's Dissertation of Jabatan Fiqh and Usul, Akademi Pengajian Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Hamat, M. F., & Ellias, M. S. (2010). “Aspek-Aspek Pemikiran Kritis dalam al-Qaw?’id al-Fiqhiyyah”, Jurnal Syariah, j. 18, Bil. 3.
Yusuf, M. (1993). “Hubungan antara Kelompok”, dalam Abdul Halim Othman (eds). Psikologi Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Al-Zarqa, M. A. (2001). Syarh al-Qaw?’id al-Fiqhiyyah. c. 2, Damsyik: D?r al-Qal?m
Muhammad, I. D. (n.d.), Qaw?’id al-Ahk?m f? Mas?lih al-An?m. Beirut: D?r al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah.
Dahlal, N. H. (2014). “Penilaian Terhadap Pengurusan Wakaf Di Majlis Agama Islam Kedah (MAIK) Berdasarkan Kaedah Tasarruf al-Im?m `Ala al-Ra`iyyah Man?t Bi al-Maslahah”. Master's Dissertation of Jabatan Fiqh and Usul, Akademi Pengajian Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Bahari, N. (2008). “Aplikasi Konsep al-Darar Yuz?l dalam Hukum Kekeluargaan Islam”. Jurnal Pengajian Islam. Bil. 3.
Ghazali, M. (2004). “Aplikasi Beberapa Kaedah Fiqh Dalam Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Malaysia: Satu Kajian Dalam Enakmen Undang-Undang Keluarga Islam Pahang 1987”, Master's Dissertation, Fakulti Pengajian Islam. Bangi: Universiti kebangsaan Malaysia.
Abdul Rahim, R. (2002). Metodologi Penyelidikan Undang-undang: Satu Tinjauan Kepada Kajian Sosio-Perundangan. Seminar Kemantapan Akademik UKM.
Desa, R. (2012). “Aplikasi Kaedah al-Darurah Dalam Perkhidmatan Kesihatan Di Malaysia”, Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Jabatan Fiqh dan Usul, Akademi Pengajian Islam. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya.
Rejab & Abdullah. (1982). Panduan Menulis Tesis. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Idid, S. A. (1999). Analisa Kandungan. Bangi: Jabatan Komunikasi UKM.
Al-Subki, T. D. (n.d.), al-Asyb?h wa al-Naz?’ir. j. 1, Kaherah: D?r al-Kutub al-`Arabiy
Al-Abidin, Z. (1968). al-Asyb?h wa al-Naz?’ir `ala Madhhab Abi Hanifah al-Nu`man. Kaherah: Muassasah al-Halab?.
Zubir. (2008). “Sumber Perundangan Islam Dan Kaedah Fiqh Serta Hubungan Kedua-duanya Dalam Menyelesaikan Beberapa Persoalan Semasa”. Master's Dissertation, Pusat Pengajian Ilmu Kemanusiaan. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
(Urus, 2024)
Urus, N. S. T. (2024). A Respective Review of Preferred Islamic Legal Maxims Performed in Malaysia with Spectrum to The Pronouncement of Talak Outside of Court. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 2139–2151.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode