This research explores the students’ difficulties in physics subject among secondary school students during learning in class. The study aims to address the primary research objective which is to examine the reasons for selecting physics subject between genders. To achieve these objectives, a comprehensive examination of students’ difficulties in learning physics subject was conducted, considering various factors that contribute to the difficulties and the student’s coping mechanism. The method approach was done using quantitative analysis. Quantitative data was analyzed using Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS), the software programs that calculate all the data run. The study also aims to provide evidence-based suggestions for teachers, students, and policymakers to improve the effectiveness of physics subject in secondary schools. The ultimate objective is to support the development of curriculum design and teaching methodologies, resulting in a more supportive learning environment that meets the various needs of secondary school physics students. The larger educational community as well as teachers and administrators who are interested in raising the standard of secondary school physics instruction are expected to find this research to be significant.
Adams, J., & Garcia, M. (2023). Examining the Relationship Between Exam Anxiety and Academic Avoidance in Physics Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 245-257.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). "Not Girly, Not Sexy, Not Glamorous": Primary school girls' and parents' constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(3), 373-396.
Bandura, A. (2019). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Brown, A., & Davis, R. (2021). Fostering Epistemic Humility in Physics Education: A Reflective Approach. Journal of Physics Education, 36(2), 147-165.
David, B., Resnik, J. D. (2020). What Is Ethics in Research & Why Is It Important? https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Dewi, S., & Nur, A. H. (2018). Analyzing Students’ Problem Solving Difficulties on Modern Physics. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012205/pdf
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78-89.
Fe, J. N., & Michael, K. C. (2017). High School Students' Difficulties in Physics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320980117_HIGH_SCHOOL_STUDENTS'_D IFFICULTIES_IN_PHYSICS
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Garcia, M., and Lee, S. (2023). "Building Confidence through External Tuition: A Qualitative Analysis of Student Experiences in Physics Learning." International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 56-73.
Hsu, Y., & Wang, C. (2020). Role ambiguity and its impact on collaborative learning in physics experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 358-376.
Johnson, A., Smith, B., & Williams, C. (2020). Enhancing Physics Education Through Interactive Simulations. Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 145-162.
Lee, S., & Wang, Y. (2022). Mindfulness Interventions in Physics Education: A Meta-analysis of Effects on Stress and Anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 118(4), 567-580.
Majed A. & Naif A. (2020, March 3). Constructivism as a Learning Theory Applied to Thinking in Solving Physics Problems: An Interpretive Study. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2020/March-2020/06.pdf
Martin, A., Johnson, B., & Garcia, T. (2020). The Impact of Social Connectivity on Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 483–498.
McCombes, S. (2023). Sampling methods: Types, techniques & examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/sampling-methods/
Mukesh T. (2020). Why is Physics considered to be a Difficult Subject? https://mukeshntekwani.medium.com/why-is-physics-considered-to-be-a-difficult- subject-ed4bd05a5c2f
Research guides: Organizing academic research papers: Types of research designs. Types of Research Designs - Organizing Academic Research Papers - Research Guides at Sacred Heart University. (n.d.). https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803&p=185902
Ruchika, K. (2019). Problems Faced by Students While Studying Physics During their High School Years. https://viurrspace.ca/bitstream/handle/10613/13925/Kaushal.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed
Smith, A. B., & Johnson, C. D. (2023). Enhancing Physics Learning Through Strategic Practice. Journal of Science Education, 45(2), 123-145.
Tegan, G. (2022). Semi-Structured Interview | Definition, Guide & Examples. https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/semi-structured-
Valamis. (2022). Cognitive Learning. https://www.valamis.com/hub/cognitive-learning
Villegas, F. (2023). Sampling frame: Definition, examples & how to use it. QuestionPro. https://www.questionpro.com/blog/sampling-frame/
Wang, H., Zhang, L., & Chen, D. (2022). Overcoming Challenges in Integrating Technology in Physics Education: A Case Study of High School Implementation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(1), 251-269.
Wang, L., & Sun, Q. (2019). Exploring the Difficulty of Physics Learning: A Comparative Study. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 201-215.
(Zulkiffli et al., 2024)
Zulkiffli, N. S., Aida Fazliza Mat Fadzil, N. H. M. N., Johari, N. ‘Aisyah, Othman, E. S., & Nazri, N. A. A. (2024). Exploring The Students’ Difficulties in Physics Subject among Secondary School Students During Learning in Class. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 407–417.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
