Different learners utilize distinct strategies for acquiring a new language. Prioritizing suitable learning strategies is fundamental for educators seeking to enhance the language acquisition process. This quantitative study is aimed to explore the perception of learners on their use of learning strategies among undergraduates in Malaysia. A purposive sample of 167 participants responded to the survey. The respondents were Foundation students from a public university. The instrument used was a 5-point Likert scale survey consisting of three components: cognitive, metacognitive self-regulation and resource management. The results generally suggest students’ strong inclination towards all three components. Understanding these causes can help create learning strategies to enhance language learning in the educational environment, as it sheds light on the relationship between learning strategies and language acquisition. The results also suggest a strong positive relationship between cognitive and metacognitive, metacognitive and resource management, as well as cognitive and resource management components.
Blummer, B., & Kenton, J. M. (2014). Problem solving and metacognition. Improving Student Information Search: A Metacognitive Approach. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 33-43.
Callahan, J. F., Clark, L. H., & Kellough, R. D. (2002). Teaching in the middle and secondary schools (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Hardan, A. A. (2013). Language Learning Strategies: A General Overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1712–1726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.194
Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5th Edition) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
Mok*, M. M. C., Ma, H. S., Liu, F. Y. F., & So, E. Y. P. (2005). Multilevel analysis of primary students' perception and deployment of self?learning strategies. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 129-148.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York. Newburry House Publishers.
Rahmat, N. H. (2018) Educational Psychology: A Tool for Language Research. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 655-668. https://grdspublishing.org/index.php/people/article/view/556
Shi, C. (2011). A Study of the Relationship between Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. Higher education studies, 1(1), 20-26.
Simsek, A., & Balaban, J. (2010). Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 36-45.
Sukying, A. (2021). Choices of Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of EFL University Learners. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 59-87. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1310896.pdf
Waller, L., & Papi, M. (2017). Motivation and feedback: How implicit theories of intelligence predict L2 writers’ motivation and feedback orientation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 54–65.
Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Zare, P. (2012). Language Learning Strategies Among EFL/ESL Learners: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 162–169. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_5_March_2012/20.pdf
(Rahim et al., 2024)
Rahim, N. N. E. A., Suhaimi, S. N. Y. S., Bakar, S. F. M. A., Zaki, N. A. M., & Majid, A. A. (2024). Exploring Strategies in Language Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(5), 354–366.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
