ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Online learning has gained widespread acceptance among educators and learners, yet research on student acceptance within the context of Small Private Online Courses (SPOCs) remains limited. Understanding student acceptance toward SPOCs is crucial as it serves as a foundational step before further large-scale research endeavors in this area. This study investigated students’ acceptance of SPOCs integrated with problem-solving tasks in the field of Educational Technology. The SPOC was developed following the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) model and IDEAL (Identify, Define, Explore, Act, Look) problem-solving phases. Utilizing a quantitative research design, a survey based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was administered to 161 undergraduate students at a Chinese university. Analysis of the data using SPSS version 25.0, focusing on 128 responses, reveals high levels of acceptance among students. They demonstrate strong endorsement of the SPOC in terms of perceived usefulness (mean = 3.879), perceived ease of use (mean = 3.84), behavioral intention (mean = 3.829), and usage (mean = 4.04). Notably, correlation analysis indicates a significant relationship; students who find the SPOC easy to use also perceive it as useful and express a strong intention to use it for learning. This finding underscores the importance of user experience in driving acceptance and adoption of SPOCs in educational settings. Moreover, this study addresses a significant gap in understanding SPOC acceptance among Chinese university students, suggesting avenues for future research to explore further the utilization of SPOCs in China's higher education landscape.
Alhothali, A., Albsisi, M., Assalahi, H., & Aldosemani, T. (2022). Predicting student outcomes in online courses using machine learning techniques: A review. Sustainability, 14(10), 6199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106199
Amer, T. (2007). E-learning and Education. Cairo: Dar Alshehab publication.
Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M., & Al-Sharafi, M. A. (2020). The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and informatics, 54, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101468
Bao, Z. (2021). Current Situation and Reflection: A Review of Domestic Online Course Research in the Past Ten Years——Based on Bibliometric Analysis of 8 CSSCI Journals. Electronic Education for Primary and Secondary Schools, (10), 9-12.
Bedregal-Alpaca, N., Guevara, K., Delgado-Barra, L., & Laura-Ochoa, L. (2022, September). Adaptive structure of a SPOC to train teachers in active methodologies: Cooperative Learning Case. In 2022 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 108-113. doi: 10.1109/LWMOOCS53067.2022.9927938
Caplan, D., & Graham, R. (2004). The development of online courses. Theory and practice of online learning, 175.
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021). A literature review: efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institution using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1367-1385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research: Developments, debates, and dilemma (pp. 315-26). Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Guo, P. (2017). MOOC and SPOC, which one is better?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5961-5967. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01044a
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of biomedical informatics, 43(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
Ifinedo, P. (2016). Applying uses and gratifications theory and social influence processes to understand students' pervasive adoption of social networking sites: Perspectives from the Americas. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 192-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.007
Jia, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Research and application of online SPOC teaching mode in analog circuit course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00247-0
Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101212
Kharma, Q. (2019). Investigating students’ acceptance of online courses at Al-Ahliyya Amman University. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(7). doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100729
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology : Methods and techniques. new Age.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Leszczy?ski, P., Charuta, A., ?aziuk, B., Ga??zkowski, R., Wejnarski, A., Roszak, M., & Ko?odziejczak, B. (2018). Multimedia and interactivity in distance learning of resuscitation guidelines: a randomised controlled trial. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1337035
Li, J., Han, X., Wan, Y., Zhang, S., Zhao, Y., Fan, R., & Zhou, Y. (2018). TAM 2.0: tool for MicroRNA set analysis. Nucleic acids research, 46(W1), W180-W185. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky509
Li, Y., Qi, J., & Shu, H. (2008). Review of Relationships Among Variables in TAM. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 273-278.
Lin, J., & Cantoni, L. (2018). Decision, implementation, and confirmation: Experiences of instructors behind tourism and hospitality MOOCs. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3402
Maranguni?, N., & Grani?, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society, 14, 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
Martin, F., Ritzhaupt, A., Kumar, S., & Budhrani, K. (2019a). Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation. The Internet and Higher Education, 42, 34–43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001
Martínez-Muñoz, G., & Pulido, E. (2015). Using a SPOC to flip the classroom. In 2015 IEEE global Engineering education conference (EDUCON) (pp. 431-436). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096007
McGreal, R., & Elliott, M. (2008). Technologies of online learning (e-learning).Theory and practice of online learning, 115.
Muchran, M., and Ahmar, A. S. (2019). Application of TAM model to the use of information technology. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (2.9), 37-40. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.11358
Olugbara, C. T., Letseka, M., & Olugbara, O. O. (2021). Multiple Correspondence Analysis of Factors Influencing Student Acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses. Sustainability, 13(23), 13451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313451
Olugbara, C. T., Letseka, M., Ogunsakin, R. E., & Olugbara, O. O. (2021). Meta-analysis of factors influencing student acceptance of massive open online courses for open distance learning. The African Journal of Information Systems, 13(3), 5.
Ong, C. S., & Lai, J. Y. (2006). Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Computers in human behavior, 22(5), 816-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
Ruiz-Palmero, J., Fernández-Lacorte, J. M., Sánchez-Rivas, E., & Colomo-Magaña, E. (2020). The implementation of Small Private Online Courses (SPOC) as a new approach to education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00206-1
Smedley, J. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR insight, 23(4), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.11
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Issues and dilemmas in teaching research methods courses in social and behavioural sciences: US perspective. International journal of social research methodology, 6(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570305055
Turk, M., Heddy, B. C., & Danielson, R. W. (2022). Teaching and social presences supporting basic needs satisfaction in online learning environments: How can presences and basic needs happily meet online?. Computers & Education, 180, 104432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104432
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39(2), 273-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-learning in Higher Education? A Stakeholders’ Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 26- 36.
Wang, F. (2021). Analysis of the acceptance of SPOC teaching mode of foreign language courses during the new crown epidemic. Journal of Inner Mongolia Electric University, 04, 69-73.
Xu, W., Jia Y., Fox, A., & Patterson. (2014). ‘From MOOC to SPOC——A Conversation Based on MOOC Practice at UC Berkeley and Tsinghua University’, Modern Distance Education Research, 4, 13-22.
Yang, X., Zhou, H., Zhou, X., & Hao, Z. (2019). A Review of Domestic Online Course Quality Assurance Research. Audiovisual Education Research, 40(6), 50-57. DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2019.06.007
Ye, D., Wan, K. & Huang, Y. (2016). A Study on the Influencing Factors of MOOC Acceptance of Students in Local Normal Colleges, Journal of Shangrao Normal University,36(03), 59-64. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2237.2016.03.012
Yin, R., Liu, L., Zhang M., & Shi J.. (2015). A Content Analysis of the Design and Development Characteristics of Hundreds of Massive Open Online Courses Abroad: A Curriculum Perspective. Audiovisual Education Research, 36(12), 30-37. DOI:10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2015.12.005
Zhu, Y., He, J., & Li, Z. (2021). Research on SPOC blended teaching behavior intention in the context of inter-school online course sharing——A multi-group perspective based on structural equations based on the TAM model. Advances in Education, 12, 348.
(Tan & Tasir, 2024)
Tan, X., & Tasir, Z. (2024). Students’ Acceptance towards Small Private Online Course: A Case Study in one of Chinese Universities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 14(5), 1347–1360.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode