Writing difficulties influence how students write in every writing stage. Applying the cyclical nature of writing difficulties across different stages of the writing process, this paper investigates students’ perception of their writing difficulties and writing stages based on five research questions. The quantitative study employed a survey (41-item questionnaire) with a purposive sample of 267 respondents. Data were collected and analysed using SPSS, and the findings were presented by using descriptive and inferential statistics. The findings indicated that moderate levels of writing difficulty are prevalent across these areas of rhetorical situation, goal setting, teaching instruction, teacher explanation, long-term memory, individual paragraph, and writing process, with significant challenges particularly noted in rhetorical situation and goal setting. The findings also reported that reviewing assignment requirements and studying model essays by skilled writers are considered very important in before writing stage. Meanwhile, the findings also revealed that in while write stage, starting with the introduction is a highly popular strategy among students, emphasizing its importance in beginning the writing process well. The findings for when revising stage showed that checking if the essay meets the requirements is seen as the most important revision strategy. Finally, correlation analyses revealed three relationships between the writing difficulties and all the writing stages. Discussions of the findings and implications of the study are also reported in this paper.
Akhtar, R., Hassan, H., Saidalvi, A., & Hussain, S. (2019). A systematic review of the challenges and solutions of ESL students’ academic writing. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(5), 1169-1171. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.E1164.0585C19
Aldabbus, S., & Almansouri, E. (2022). Academic writing difficulties encountered by university EFL learners. British Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 1-11. Retrieved from https://tudr.org/id/eprint/595/
Bram, B., & Angelina, P. (2022). Indonesian Tertiary Education Students' Academic Writing Setbacks and Solutions. International Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 267-280. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i3.22043
Bulqiyah, S., Mahbub, M. A., & Nugraheni, D. A. (2021). Investigating writing difficulties in essay writing: Tertiary students’ perspectives. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 61-73. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i1.2371
Fajrina, D., Everatt, J., Fletcher, J., Astall, C., & Sadeghi, A. (2023). How do Indonesian EFL students’ writing strategies and writing process differ from English L1 students?. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 907-925. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.28888
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/356600
Ismail, S. (2019). Impact of differentiated instruction on the writing process of ESL learners. ELF Annual Research Journal, 21, 130-153. Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/download/62624248/ELF%20Differentiated_Instructions20200331-37436-1ojowen.pdf
Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach (5th Edition) Boston, USA. Cengage Learning.
Li, K. L., & Razali, A. B. (2019). Idea Sharing: Process-Based Approach to Writing in Malaysian English Education. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 58, 319-341. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1227023
Mdodana-Zide, L., & Mafugu, T. (2023). An Interventive Collaborative Scaffolded Approach with a Writing Center on ESL Students’ Academic Writing. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 6(2), 34-50. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2023.7
Nguyen, T. T. (2024). Essay writing strategies employed by English-majored sophomores at a university in Vietnam. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 345-367. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i1.1533
Petri?, B., & Czárl, B. (2003). Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. System, 31(2), 187-215. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ668028
Rahmat, N. H. (2023). Writing about Writing: An Exploration of Types of Knowledge and Writing Difficulties. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 807 – 817. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i6/17230
Rahmat, N. H., Arepin, M., Aripin, N., & Razlan, Z. (2021) Cycle of Writing Prophecy: Exploring Beliefs and Fear in Academic Writing. 6(6), 1-16. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i6.3900
Rahmat, N. H., Thasrabiab, T., Taib, S. A., Jenal, N., Sukimin, I. S., Zamani, N. F. M., & Amir, N. (2022). Perception of Difficulties and Learners’ Reasons in Academic Writing: A Self-Imposed Prophecy. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 531 – 543. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i10/14870
Rahmat, N. H., & Whanchit, W. (2024). Exploring Writing Process from The Social Cultural Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14 (3), 267-278. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i3/20931
Selvaraj, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Systematic review: Approaches in teaching writing skill in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 450-473. Retrieved from
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6564
Yabukoshi, T., & Mizumoto, A. (2024). University EFL Learners' Use of Technology and Their Perceived Difficulties in Academic Writing. LET Kansai Chapter Collected Papers, 22, 117-129. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.50924/letkansai.22.0_117
(Taib et al., 2024)
Taib, S. A., Sa’adan, N., Noor Shahariah Saleh, N. J., Ahmad, A., & Yusuf, M. H. (2024). The Cycle of Writing Difficulties and Writing Stages. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(6), 1305–1321.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seenavc at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
