Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

A Conceptual Framework of Factors Influencing Citizens’ Intention to Use E-Government Services in Togo

Bouklinam Abalo, Apetogbo Komlan Aklikokou

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i9/22680

Open access

The uptake of e-Government services by citizenry remains a key challenge for governments trying to offer e-services. A situation much more complicated in developing countries including Togo where the digital divide is at its extreme. Previous literature on the subject provides information on factors which can influence citizens intention to adopt or use e-Government services. Some of these factors are used in this study to construct a framework based on the Togolese context. A set of questionnaires was prepared and administered to gather primary data for the study. The framework or research model variables were tested for convergent validity and discriminant validity through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Measures used include Average Variance Extracted, Composite Reliability and Squared correlations. These measures provide an assessment of statistical and empirical significance for the research model. Regression analysis was performed to test the model after validation of the constructs and significant and non-significant variables were analyzed and discussed. Perceived E-Government Benefits, Social Influence, Degree of Openness to E-Government, Trust in Public Authorities, Internet Experience, and Internet Access, all have a significant impact on Citizens’ intention to use e-Government services in Togo.

Abu-Dalbouh, H. M. (2013). A questionnaire approach based on the technology acceptance model for mobile tracking on patient progress applications. Journal of Computer Science, 9(6), 763-770.
Algharibi, A. J., & Arvanitis, T. N. (2011). Adapting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a tool for validating user needs on the implementation of e-Trial software systems. In Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 526-530). British Computer Society.
Al-Hashmi, A., & Suresha. (2013). Evaluating the awareness of e-government in the Republic of Yemen. International Journal of Computer Applications, 67(16), 41-45.
Al-Jaghoub, S., Al-Yaseen, H., & Al-Hourani, M. (2010). Evaluation of awareness and acceptability of using e-government services in developing countries: The case of Jordan. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 13(1), 1-8.
Al-Khattab, A., Al-Shalabi, H., Al-Rawad, M., Al-Khattab, K., & Hamad, F. (2015). The effect of trust and risk perception on citizen’s intention to adopt and use e-government services in Jordan. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(3), 279-290.
Aman, A., Al-Shbail, T. A., & Mohammed, Z. (2013). Enhancing public organizations' accountability through e-government systems. International Journal of Conceptions on Management and Social Science, 1(1), 15-21.
Basu, S. (2004). E-government and developing countries: An overview. International Review of Law Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109–132.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & McClure, C. R. (2008). Citizen-centered e-government services: Benefits, costs, and research needs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 137-142). Digital Government Society of North America.
Bhatnagar, S., & Deane, A. (2004). Building blocks of e-government: Lessons from developing countries (No. 11261). The World Bank.
Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 123-132.
Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 152-167.
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25.
Carter, L., & Weerakkody, V. (2008). E-government adoption: A cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 473–482.
Chang, M. K. (1998). Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(16), 1825-1834.
Chen, Y. N., Chen, H. M., Huang, W., & Ching, R. K. H. (2006). E-government strategies in developed and developing countries: An implementation framework and case study. Journal of Global Information Management, 14(1), 23-46.
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504.
Da Silva, I. S. (2015, February 1). Togo trains staff to manage e-government network. Biztech Africa.
Dumitrache, V. M., N?stase, M., Laz?r, V., Andreica, C., & Vasilache, P. C. (2021). EU28 countries performance in eGovernment in 2019-2020. Revista de Management Comparat International, 22(1), 102-109.
Farouk, F. M., & Kalid, K. S. (2005, December). The awareness of electronic government from the Malaysian perspectives. Paper presented at the Seminar Kebangsaan E-Komuniti, Putrajaya.
Farrell, A., & Rudd, J. (2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. ANZMAC.
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451-474.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Holliday, I., & Yep, R. (2005). E-government in China. Public Administration and Development, 25(3), 239–249.
Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception, and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in the Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838–1852.
Koenderink, P. M. (2013). Understanding intention and initial usage of e-government services at the Gemeente Wierden: Factors influencing the intention to do online transactions with the Gemeente Wierden (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente).
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1-24.
Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co.
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2).
Tat-Kei Ho, A. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444.
Thomas, C. A., Mbarika, V. W., Nwogu, R., Musa, P. F., & Meso, P. (2009). Facilitating better governance through e-government initiatives: Successful case in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354-369.
United Nations. (2014). United Nations E-Government Survey 2014: E-Government for the Future We Want. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
United Nations. (2016). United Nations E-Government Survey 2016: E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328-376.
Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2004). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371-391.
Yonazi, J., Sol, H., & Boonstra, A. (2010). Exploring issues underlying citizen adoption of e-government initiatives in developing countries: The case of Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 8(2), 176-188.
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9(2), 79-94.
Zafiropoulos, K., Karavasilis, I., & Vrana, V. (2012). Assessing the adoption of e-government services by teachers in Greece. Future Internet, 4(2), 528-544.
Zhang, C., & Zhang, M. (2001, March 10-13 & March 19-April 1). Public administration and administrative reform in China for the 21st century. Paper presented at the annual conference and online virtual conference of the American Society for Public Administration.

Abalo, B., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2024). A Conceptual Framework of Factors Influencing Citizens’ Intention to Use E-Government Services in Togo. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(9), 1167–1189.