ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
As research and pedagogical theories continue to evolve, educators are provided with a diverse array of teaching methods to select from. The preference of educators for specific teaching methodologies significantly influences students' learning experiences. Thus, conducting an inquiry into educators' preferences regarding teaching methods is essential, as the outcome obtained will benefit both students and educators alike, particularly in aligning educators' preferences with student learning needs and preferences. This research investigates the perceptions of educators regarding various teaching methods employed in the classroom setting. The study utilizes a quantitative survey methodology involving 63 respondents currently engaged in teaching at a local university. The instrument utilized is a 5-point Likert-scale survey, adopted from the works of Thornton (2013) and Grasha (1994). Comprising four sections, this instrument encompasses: Demographic Profiles, Direct, Discuss, and Delegate teaching methods, respectively. The findings reveal that the Discuss method is the most favoured method followed by Direct and Delegate method respectively. The Discuss method being the main preference of these teachers reflects that they are more inclined towards applying a teacher-centred approach in their classrooms. These findings offer valuable insights into the preferences of instructors regarding teaching methodologies, contributing to the understanding of instructional practices within the academic setting.
Ahmed, S., Khan Farooqi, M. T., & Iqbal, A. (2021). A Study of Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Students’ Performance. Ilkogretim Online, 20(2).
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Pearson Education.
Dorgu, T. E., (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(6-1), 77-87.
Durmus, A., & Güven, M. (2020). The relationship between teaching styles of English instructors and learning styles of English prep class students at a Turkish State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 15-26.
Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and social studies, 10(4), 16-37.
Grasha, A. F. (1994) A Matter of style: The Teacher as Expert, Formal Authority, personal Model, Facilitator, and Delegator. College Teaching, 42(4),142-149. https://www.montana.edu/gradschool/documents/A-Matter-of-STyle-Grashab.pdf
Giri, N., Pavitra, B., & Gnanasundari, K. (2023).Teaching Methodologies and Assessment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374925062_Teaching_Methodologies_and_Assessment
Hamdan, A. R., Yeo, K. J., Talib, R., Abu Naim, H., Jaffri, H., Samah, N. A., Baharin, A., Mohd Kosnin, A., Daud, K. & Lu, X. (2014). Lecture-Centred or Student-Centered: A Case Study in a Public University. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(10).
Hasanova, N., Abduazizov, B., & Khujakulov, R. (2-21).The Main Differences between Teaching Approaches, Methods, Procedures, Techniques, Styles and Strategies. Journal NX, 7(2),2581-4230.
Imran, R., & Saeed, M. (2018) Discussion-Based Teaching: Experiences of University Teachers and Students. PJERE, 4(1), 33-50.
Intarapanich, C. (2012)Teaching Methods, Approaches and Strategies Found in EFL Classrooms: A Case Study in Lao PDR. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 88, 306 – 311.
Jackson, S. L. (2015) Research methods and Statistics-A Critical Thinking Approach (5th ed.) Boston, USA:: Cengage Learning.
Khoirunnisa, F. (2023). Teaching style used by teachers in a private junior high school in Salatiga.[Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/42658
Klassen, R. M., & Tze, V. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 12, 59-76.
Mahdieh, O., Abbasi, D. & Salmani, M. (2023). Investigating the Relationship between Teaching Methods, Students`s Motivation and Learning. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 25 (99), 91-109.
Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2021). Teacher-centered versus student-centered teaching: Preferences and differences across academic majors. Journal of Effective teaching in Higher education, 4(1), 18-39.
Rahmat, N. H. (2021) Revisiting Lecturers’ Role: Towards a Model of Lecturers’ Quadrant. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(6), 165-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i6.3790
Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sajjad, S. (2010).Effective Teaching Methods at Higher Education Level. Pakistan Journal of Special Education, 11, 29-43.
Shaari, A. S., Yusoff, N. M., Ghazali, I. M., Osman, R. H., & Dzahir, N. F. M. (2014). The Relationship between Lecturers’ Teaching Styles and Students’ Academic Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 10 – 20.
Stegmeier, S. (2019).Teaching Style: Norway and Zanzibar-Comparison.
Su-Bergil, A., & Erçevik, A. (2019). The prospective EFL teachers' impressions towards teaching styles: Foresights for their professions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(4), 1236-1251.
Thornton, P. B. (2013, September 30). Three Teaching Styles. Philosophy of Teaching. Faculty Focus.
Vikoo, B. (2003). Learning theories and instructional process. Owerri: Springfield Publishers Ltd.
Vijayan, B. N., Amaruddin, H. S., Johari, N. N. F., Ghazali, A. S., & Min, L. S. (2024). Investigating Lecturers’ Perceptions of Teaching Methods in Tertiary Classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(8), 3132–3146.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode