ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The role of civil servants in shaping governance federal systems is influenced by motives and adherence to ethical principles, which directly impact political knowledge and decision-making. The article examines how motives and ethics among civil servants influence governance effectiveness and public trust in federal systems. This review analyzed existing literature on the intersection of motives, ethics, and political knowledge within the context of civil service in federal systems—a systematic review methodology covering studies published between 2003 and 2023. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, and Google Scholar using relevant keywords and search strings. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied during the screening process, followed by data extraction and quality assessment. The findings revealed civil servants' ethical motives enhance accountability and decision-making, while challenges like political patronage and ideological bias can hinder integrity and objectivity. Specialized knowledge from policy advocacy motives may limit broader governance effectiveness. The findings emphasize the need for strong ethical frameworks, continuous training, and institutional support to promote knowledgeable and ethically driven governance. This study recommends more robust ethical training programs, clear regulatory frameworks, and enhanced oversight mechanisms to ensure that civil servants' motives align with the principles of good governance.
Acharya, K. K., & Zafarullah, H. (2020). Institutionalising federalism in Nepal: operationalising obstacles, procrastinated progress. Public Administration and Policy, 23(2), 125-139.
Ali, M. (2015). Decentralized Governance Initiatives in Pakistan: Post 18th Amendment Perspective. Pakistan Perspectives, 20(2), 67.
Aliyu, A. A., Ismail, M. M., & Md Nor, M. S. (2022). Influence of Political Knowledge on Civil Servant’s Perceptions towards Nigerian Federalism among Civil Servants in Bauchi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(10), 398-408.
Alkendi, K. S. (2011). Mid-level management: Perceptions of participation and efficacy in national security decision-making in the United Arab Emirates. University of Arkansas.
Alston, L. J., Melo, M. A., Mueller, B., & Pereira, C. (2006). Political institutions, policymaking processes and policy outcomes in Brazil.
Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Profiles of public service-motivated civil servants: Evidence from a multicultural country. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 5-18.
Anderfuhren-Biget, S., Varone, F., & Giauque, D. (2014). Policy environment and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 807–825.
Aranha, M. I., Pinheiro, A. A., & Cruz, J. M. (2014). Latin American Federative Variables for ICT and Development Research: A Comparison between Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela.
Ardanaz, M., Leiras, M., & Tommasi, M. (2014). The politics of federalism in Argentina and its implications for governance and accountability. World development, 53, 26-45.
Atkinson, M. M., Marchildon, G. P., Phillips, P. W., Rasmussen, K. A., Béland, D., & McNutt, K. (2013). Governance and public policy in Canada: A view from the provinces. University of Toronto Press.
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (Eds.). (2006). Decentralization and local governance in developing countries: A comparative perspective. MIT press.
Bayer, J. (2003). Re-Balancing State and Federal Power: Toward a Political Principle of Subsidiarity in the United States. Am. UL Rev., 53, 1421.
Behnke, N., & Kropp, S. (2021). Administrative federalism. Public administration in Germany, 35-51.
Behrens, M. (2016). Switzerland: Between the federal structure and global challenges. Education in Non-EU Countries in Western and Southern Europe, 8, 75.
Biland, E., & Gally, N. (2018). Civil servants and policy analysis in central government. In Policy analysis in France (pp. 101-118). Policy Press.
Bourgault, J., & Dunn, C. (Eds.). (2014). Deputy ministers in Canada: Comparative and jurisdictional perspectives. University of Toronto Press.
Brenton, S. (2023). Does federalism enhance representative democracy? Perpetual reform and shifting power in a divided Belgium. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(2), 500-518.
Brewer, G. A., Selden, S. C., & Facer, R. L. (2000). Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 254–264.
Brinkerhoff, D. W., Wetterberg, A., & Dunn, S. (2012). Service delivery and legitimacy in fragile and conflict-affected states: Evidence from water services in Iraq. Public Management Review, 14(2), 273-293.
Byman, D. (2003). Constructing a democratic Iraq: Challenges and opportunities. International Security, 28(1), 47-78.
Chandrika, A., & Acharya, K. K. (2020). Deconstructing Federalism through the lens of Federal Constitution of Nepal. Essays on Constitutional Law, Kathmandu, Nepal Law Society, 40, 90-117.
Cheung, C. Y. (2009). Public service neutrality in Hong Kong: Problems and prospects. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(SUPPL. 1), 17–26.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2005). Trust in Government: The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.
Colombo, C., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2020). Heuristics and biases in political decision making. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics, 8, 23-44
Demmke, C. (2005). Are civil servants different because they are civil servants? (pp. 1-127). Présidence luxembourgeoise du Conseil de l'Union européenne.
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. The Age of Direct Citizen Participation, 63–77.
Eichbaum, C., & Shaw, R. (Eds.). (2010). Partisan appointees and public servants: An international analysis of the role of the political adviser.
Evans, C. L. (2001). Leadership in committee: A comparative analysis of leadership behavior in the US Senate. University of Michigan Press.
Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative ethics and professional competence: Accountability and performance under globalization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(1), 127–143.
Fiseha, A. (2019). Federalism, development and the changing political dynamics in Ethiopia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(1), 151-176.
Franklin, A., Krane, D., & Ebdon, C. (2013). Multilevel governance processes–citizens & local budgeting: Comparing Brazil, China, & the United States. International Review of Public Administration, 18(1), 121-144.
Gagnon, A. G. (2021). Multinational federalism: Challenges, shortcomings and promises. Regional & Federal Studies, 31(1), 99-114.
Gailmard, S., & Patty, J. W. (2007). Slackers and zealots: Civil service, policy discretion, and bureaucratic expertise. American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 873–889.
Galston, W. A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual review of political science, 4(1), 217-234.
Gangte, M. (2010). ‘Right Man for the Right Job’Motivate to Deliver (Case study on Indian Civil Service System). Dynamics of Public Administration, 27(2), 13-20.
Garritzmann, J. L., Röth, L., & Kleider, H. (2021). Policy-Making in Multi-Level Systems: Ideology, Authority, and Education. In Comparative Political Studies, 54(12):2155-2190
Gerson, D. (2020). Leadership for a high performing civil service: Towards senior civil service systems in OECD countries.
Graycar, A., & Sidebottom, A. (2012). Corruption and control: a corruption reduction approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384-399.
Grube, D. (2015). Responsibility to Be Enthusiastic? Public Servants and the Public Face of “Promiscuous Partisanship.” Governance, 28(3), 305–320.
Hadiyantina, S. (2021). The most appropriate strategy to enhance civil servants’ neutrality in the governance. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 37(1), 61-78.
Heeks, R. (2002). e-Government in Africa: Promise and practice. Information polity, 7(2-3), 97-114.
Huber, J. D. (2000). Delegation to civil servants in parliamentary democracies. European Journal OfPolitical Research, 37, 397–413.
Ile, I. U. (2004). Federalism in a multi-ethnic state with special reference to Nigeria. Journal of Public Administration, 39(4), 607-619.
Jacobson, W. S. (2011). Creating a motivated workforce: How organizations can enhance and develop public service motivation (PSM). Public Personnel Management, 40(3), 215-238.
Junn, J., & Masuoka, N. (2008). Asian American identity: Shared racial status and political context. Perspectives on Politics, 6(4), 729–740.
Kettl, D. F., Ingraham, P. W., & Sanders, R. P. (2010). Civil service reform: Building a government that works. Brookings Institution Press.
Knassmüller, M., & Veit, S. (2016). Culture matters–the training of senior civil servants in Austria, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. Teaching Public Administration, 34(2), 120-149.
Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. (2017). Governance networks in public administration and public policy. Routledge.
Kopecký, P., Meyer-Sahling, J. H., & Spirova, M. (2022). (Extreme) political polarization and party patronage. Irish Political Studies, 37(2), 218–243.
Kumar, C. R. (2003). Corruption and human rights: promoting transparency in governance and the fundamental right to corruption-free service in India. ColUm. J. ASIAn l., 17, 31.
Lee, Y. J., & Jeong, J. W. (2015). The Link Between Public Service Motivation and Volunteering: The Case of South Korean Civil Servants. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 355–363.
Leider, R. (2020). Federalism and the Military Power of the United States. Vand. L. Rev., 73, 989-991
Levy, E. (2023). Leadership, Brazil. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 7487-7491). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Maropo, O. J. (2018). The lack of accountability and transparency in local government in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State).
Maybin, J. (2015). Policy Analysis and Policy Know-how: A Case Study of Civil Servants in England’s Department of Health. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(3), 286–304.
Meister, A. (2010). The role of regulatory agencies in public policy-making issues. Washington DC: The George Washington University.
Menkhaus, K. (2006). Governance without government in Somalia: Spoilers, state building, and the politics of coping. International security, 31(3), 74-106.
Merino, M. (2006). The Challenge of Transparency: A Review of the Regulations Governing Access to Public Information in Mexican States.
Meuleman, L. (2021). Public administration and governance for the SDGs: Navigating between change and stability. Sustainability, 13(11), 1-22
Meynhardt, T., Strathoff, P., Bardeli, J., & Brieger, S. (2024). Public administration contributes to happiness: a study on the relationship between public value and happiness in Switzerland. International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Moynihan, D. P. (2004). Protection versus flexibility: The Civil Service Reform Act, competing administrative doctrines, and the roots of contemporary public management debate. Journal of Policy History, 16(1), 1-33.
Naidoo, G. (2006). Development of senior leadership in the South African public service for accelerated service delivery. Journal of Public Administration, 40(3), 255-266.
Ndraha, A. B. (2023). Optimizing Public Services: Reconstructing the Discordant Relationship between Local Leaders to Foster Harmony (A Case Study of Indonesia). Journal of Digitainability, Realism & Mastery (DREAM), 2(07), 18-34.
Neo, S., Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Tummers, L. (2023). Core values for ideal civil servants: Service?oriented, responsive and dedicated. Public Administration Review, 83(4), 838-862.
O’Toole, B. J. (2006). The emergence of a “New” ethical framework for civil servants. Public Money and Management, 26(1), 39–46.
Ojo, O. G. (2022). Public Trust and Citizen Engagement as Democratic Tools for Good Governance in Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Oxley, Z. (2020). Framing and political decision making: An overview. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 8,1-27
Paarlberg, L. E., & Lavigna, B. (2010). Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public administration review, 70(5), 710-718.
Panizza, F., Larraburu, C. R. R., & Scherlis, G. (2018). Unpacking patronage: The politics of patronage appointments in Argentina's and Uruguay's central public administrations. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 10(3), 59-98.
Perry, J.L., R. (2005). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 390–395.
Peters, B. G. (2015). Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228.
Piatak, J. S., Sowa, J. E., Jacobson, W. S., & McGinnis Johnson, J. (2020). Infusing public service motivation (PSM) throughout the employment relationship: A review of PSM and the human resource management process. International Public Management Journal, 24(1), 86-105.
Poirier, J. (2008). Belgium: Less than Sum of Its Parts. Inroads, 23.
Pribadi, U., & Kim, H. J. (2022). Impacts of cultural behavior of civil servants on citizens' satisfaction: A survey on licensing services of Indonesian local government agencies. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(4), 1-9.
Puas, G. (2021). The Federated States of Micronesia's Engagement with the Outside World: Control, Self-Preservation and Continuity (p. 312). anu Press.
Quaglia, L. (2005). Civil servants, economic ideas, and economic policies: Lessons from Italy. Governance, 18(4), 545-566.
Rana, M. A. (2020). Decentralization experience in Pakistan: the 18th constitutional amendment. Asian Journal of Management Cases, 17(1), 61-84.
Rex, J., & Singh, G. (2003). Pluralism and multiculturalism in colonial and post-colonial society-Thematic introduction. International journal on multicultural societies, 5(2), 106-118.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2016). Recovering the Craft of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 638–647.
Rohr, J. A. (2002). Civil servants and their constitutions. Studies in Government & Public.Book Reviews, 376-377
Salomonsen, H. H., Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2016). Civil Servant Involvement in the Strategic Communication of Central Government Organizations: Mediatization and Functional Politicization. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2016.1176568
Sandberg, J., Persson, B., & Garpenby, P. (2019). The dilemma of knowledge use in political decision-making: National Guidelines in a Swedish priority-setting context. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 14(4), 425-442.
Sarihati, T., & Santosa, P. (2019). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding Political Dynamics and State Civil Administration Neutrality in Good Governance Framework. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 56–61.
Schmid, E. (2015). The Identification and Role of International Legislation Duties in a Contested Area: Must Switzerland Legislate in Relation to Business and Human Rights. Swiss. Rev. Int'l & Eur. L., 25, 563.
Solomon, B. C., Hall, M. E., & Muir, C. P. (2022). When and why bias suppression is difficult to sustain: The asymmetric effect of intermittent accountability. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1450-1476.
Sørensen, E., Hendriks, C. M., Hertting, N., & Edelenbos, J. (2020). Political boundary spanning: politicians at the interface between collaborative governance and representative democracy. Policy and Society, 39(4), 530-569.
Stark, J. E. (2004). Implementing marine protected areas policy: lessons from Canada and Australia.
Steane, P. (2008). Public Management Reforms in Australia and New Zealand: A pot-pourri overview of the past decade. Public Management Review, 10(4), 453-465.
Stepan, A. (2004). Toward a new comparative politics of federalism, multinationalism, and democracy. Federalism and democracy in Latin America, 29-84.
Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories: An Ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237–255.
Syamsir. (2016). European Journal of Economics and Business Studies The Influence of Public Service Motivation on Service Quality of Civil Servants in West Sumatra Indonesia. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 9571(August), 33–41.
Tajudin, A. A. A., & Yusoff, M. A. (2020). Challenges of the multinational federation: The case of Malaysia, 2008-2020. Intellectual Discourse, 28(2), 649-673.
Tamsah, H., Ansar, Gunawan, Yusriadi, Y., & Farida, U. (2020). Training, knowledge sharing, and quality of work-life on civil servants performance in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(3), 163-176.
Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 293–326.
Trondal, J. (2004). Re-socializing civil servants: The transformative powers of EU institutions. Acta Politica, 39, 4-30.
Tyler, C. W., & Gerken, H. K. (2022). The myth of the laboratories of democracy. Columbia Law Review, 122(8), 2187-2240.
Van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, F. (2004). “Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43(2), 143–171.
Veit, S., Hustedt, T., & Bach, T. (2017). Dynamics of change in internal policy advisory systems: The hybridization of advisory capacities in Germany. Policy Sciences, 50, 85-103.
Verma, A. (2022). Public Administration and Public Policy. KK Publications.
Viallon, M. (2013). The Role of Public Service Broadcasters in the Field of Multilingualism in Belgium and Switzerland.
Vincent, C., & Stephen, C. (2015). Local government capacity building and development: Lessons, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 3(1), 1-5.
Visser, R. (2007). Ethnicity, federalism and the idea of sectarian citizenship in Iraq: a critique. International Review of the Red Cross, 89(868), 809-822.
Vlacseková, D. (2019). Comparative analysis of motivation of civil servants and public servants in the local state administration–case study of Slovakia. Central European Journal of Labour Law and Personnel Management, 2(1), 74-93.
Weingast, B. R. (2014). Second Generation Fiscal Federalism?: Political Aspects of Decentralization and Economic Development. World Development, 53, 14–25.
Woods, R. (2017). Not Forgetting the Public Servants: Capacity-Building to Support Subnational Governance and Development Implementation. In Handbook of Research on Sub-National Governance and Development (pp. 499-519). IGI Global.
Yashaiya, N. H., & Noh, A. (2019). Persistence of bureaucratic over-representativeness or under-representativeness: Experience of the civil service in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(4), 203-216.
Yi-Chong, X., & Weller, P. (2008). “To be, but not to be seen”: Exploring the impact of international civil servants. Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51.
Yu, H., Ryoo, Y., & Han, E. (2024). Mind over matter: how biased perceptions of political knowledge influence selection and evaluation of political YouTube channels. Internet Research, 34(2), 474-494.
Zafiropoulos, K., Karavasilis, I., & Vrana, V. (2012). Assessing the Adoption of e-Government Services by Teachers in Greece. Future Internet, 4(2), 528–544.
Zahrin, Z., & Mohamed, A. M. (2022). Federalism: A Conceptual and Theoritical Perspective. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 7(30), 225-39.
Zetra, A., Khalid, K. A. T., Yanuar, F., & Marisa, S. (2022). Political Awareness, Knowledge, and Participation Relationship Using Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Jurnal Wacana Politik, 7(1):46-56
Zona, K. (2020). Power, bad governance and persistent conflicts in the horn of Africa: a case study of south Sudan.
Aliyu, A. A., Ismail, M. M., & Nor, M. S. M. (2024). Review of Understanding Motives and Ethics: The Impact on Civil Servants’ Political Knowledge and Federal Governance Systems. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(10), 1533–1551.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode