Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Cultivating Emotional Wellbeing through Biophilic Design in Malaysian Architecture

Bernard Tang Wei Kiet, Mohd Zairul Mohd Noor, Aini Azeqa Ma’rof

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i12/24007

Open access

The integration of biophilic design in Malaysian architecture seeks to reconnect urban dwellers with nature, enhancing well-being and addressing environmental concerns. Despite Malaysia's rich biodiversity and tropical climate, biophilic principles are underutilized, revealing a gap in architectural practice. This research investigates biophilic design's application and effectiveness in Malaysia, emphasizing cultural relevance and stakeholder engagement. By exploring key biophilic elements and their impact on emotional well-being, the study aims to develop strategies tailored to the Malaysian context. Expected outcomes include improved emotional health, productivity, and sustainable urban development, contributing to healthier, more holistic built environments.

Abdul Tharim, A. H., Mohamed Saraf, M. H., Che Ahmad, A., Mohamed Saraf, M. H., Ahmad, A. C., Purwanto, E., Tafridj, I., Purisari, R., & Prasetio, T. (2023). Biophilic Design Strategies Performance in Malaysian Green Rated Office Buildings. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(4).
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i4/16673
Azan, A. R. A., & Ismail, L. H. (2022). The Impact of Biophilic Design Building on Human Health and Wellbeing of The Physical Environment in Kuala Lumpur. … Trends in Civil Engineering and Built …, 3(1), 1857–1863.
https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/rtcebe/article/view/3010%0Ahttps://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/rtcebe/article/download/3010/2243
Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., & Roös, P. (2017). Biophilic Design Applications: Putting Theory and Patterns into Built Environment Practice. KnE Engineering, 2(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.18502/keg.v2i2.596
Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3), 948–963.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948
Gray, T., & Birrell, C. (2014). Are biophilic-designed site office buildings linked to health benefits and high performing occupants? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(12), 12204–12222.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111212204
Hamimi, A., Tharim1, A., Ahmad1, A. C., & Sidrotul, P. (2022). the Determinant Factors of Biophilic Design Strategies and Occupants’ Psychological Performance in Office Building. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment Special Issue, 87–106. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v9i3.18292
Mat Idris, M., Sibley, M., Hadjri, K., & Abd Manaf, A. (2021). Factors Influencing the Visit to the Courtyard Gardens in Public Hospitals in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 6(20), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.21834/ajebs.v6i20.396
Nasar, J. L. (2008). Assessing Perceptions of Environments for Active Living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.013
Siebring, E. (2020). Biophilic Urbanism in the Netherlands. 1–23.
Soto, M., Xue, H., & Tsekleves, E. (2022). Diseño para el equilibrio bienestar y salud. Base Diseño E Innovación, 7(6), 4–11.
https://revistas.udd.cl/index.php/BDI/article/view/786/609
Wijesooriya, N., Brambilla, A., & Markauskaite, L. (2023). Biophilic design frameworks: A review of structure, development techniques and their compatibility with LEED sustainable design criteria. Cleaner Production Letters, 4(February), 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100033
Wu, Y., Wu, S., Qiu, X., Wang, S., Yao, S., Li, W., You, H., Zhang, J., Xia, S., & Guo, Y. (2022). Integrated Evaluation Method of the Health-Related Physical Environment in Urbanizing Areas: A Case Study From a University Campus in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10(February), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.801023
Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006
Zulkifli, N. H., Sapian, A. R., & Ibrahim, P. H. (2023). Conceptual Framework of Biophilic Design Elements (BDE) for Indoor Work Settings. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, si6(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2023-si6(1)-12


Kiet, B. T. W., Noor, M. Z. M., & Ma’rof, A. A. (2024). Cultivating Emotional Wellbeing Through Biophilic Design in Malaysian Architecture. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(12), 599–608.