ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Metacognition plays an important role in education, enhancing learning outcomes and promotes educational efficiency across disciplines and educational levels. In this systematic review, we synthesized evidence from 15 studies, adhering strictly to PRISMA guidelines, to explore the impact of metacognitive strategies on academic performance, efficiency, and the contextual factors influencing their effectiveness. Thematic synthesis identified four major topics: (1) impact of metacognition on learning outcomes, (2) the influence of metacognition on educational efficiency, (3) key moderators and mediators of metacognition’s effect, and (4) methods of assessing metacognition. The findings showed that metacognitive strategies greatly improve educational performance, self-regulated learning and critical thinking skills. In STEM, these strategies increased the problem-solution accuracy and self-efficacy, while in humanities; they supported reflective practices such as critical reading and writing. Educational efficiency was improved through better time management, low instructional time and greater learner autonomy. Moderators and mediating variables such as age, gender, cultural criteria, teacher support and motivation shaped the effectiveness of metacognitive interventions. Common assessment methods included self-report tool and classroom observation and digital tools, although limited use of real-time techniques such as think aloud protocols highlights an occasion for future research. This review emphasizes the transformative ability of metacognitive strategies, identifying gaps in methodological diversity and geographical representation. Addressing these limitations will lead to better integration of metacognition in global educational practices.
Abdelrahim, Y. (2022). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory: Can researchers add more cultural dimensions? In T. Ahram & R. Taiar (Eds.), Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems. Springer International Publishing, 19, 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_60
Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
Ajayi, J. (2024). Metacognitive Strategies in the Classroom. Research Gate
Albazi, S., & Shukri, N. (2016). Evaluating the Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on Reading Comprehension of Female Students at KAU. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(3), 172–183. ProQuest Central. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.3p.172
An, D., Ye, C., & Liu, S. (2024). The influence of metacognition on learning engagement the mediating effect of learning strategy and learning behavior. Current Psychology, 43(40), 31241–31253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06400-y
Antonio, R., & Prudente, M. (2021). Effectiveness of metacognitive instruction on students’ science learning achievement: A meta-analysis. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.50
Arianto, F., & Hanif, M. (2024). Evaluating metacognitive strategies and self-regulated learning to predict primary school students’ self-efficacy and problem-solving skills in science learning. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202428575
Babayi?it, S., & Shapiro, L. (2020). Component skills that underpin listening comprehension and reading comprehension in learners with English as first and additional language. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12291
Bormanaki, H. B., & Khoshhal, Y. (2017). The role of equilibration in Piaget’s theory of cognitive development and its implication for receptive skills: A theoretical study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 996. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.22
Chytrý, V., ?í?an, J., Eisenmann, P., & Medová, J. (2020). Metacognitive knowledge and mathematical intelligence—two significant factors influencing school performance. Mathematics, 8(6), 969. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8060969
De Boer, H., Donker, A. S., Kostons, D. D. N. M., & Van Der Werf, G. P. C. (2018). Long-term effects of metacognitive strategy instruction on student academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 24, 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.03.002
Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645
Famarin, A. (2024). Metacognition in general science to improve the academic performance of students. Pedagogy review: An International Journal of Educational Theories, Approaches and Strategies, 2(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.62718/vmca.pr-ijetas.2.1.SC-0624-028
Fernandez, J., & Guilbert, J. (2024). Self-regulated strategy development’s effectiveness: Underlying cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms. Metacognition and Learning, 19(3), 1091–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09398-7
Flavell. (1979). Metacognition and cogntive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
Franklin, P., Tsujimoto, K. C., Lewis, M. E., Tekok-Kilic, A., & Frijters, J. C. (2018). Sex differences in self-regulatory executive functions are amplified by trait anxiety: The case of students at risk for academic failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 129, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.019
Güner, P., & Erbay, H. N. (2021). Metacognitive skills and problem-solving. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 7(3), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1594
Halmo, S. M., Yamini, K. A., & Stanton, J. D. (2024). Metacognition and self-efficacy in action: How first-year students monitor and use self-coaching to move past metacognitive discomfort during problem solving. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 23(2), ar13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-08-0158
Ilma, S., Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22083
Jääskeläinen, R. (2010). Think-aloud protocol. In Y. Gambier & L. Van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies, 1, 371–373. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.thi1
Kharroubi, S., & ElMediouni, A. (2024). Conceptual review: Cultivating learner autonomy through self-directed learning & self-regulated learning: A socio-constructivist exploration. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1649
López-Vargas, O., Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J., & Racines-Prada, O. (2017). Students? Metacognition and cognitive style and their effect on cognitive load and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 145–157. ProQuest Central.
Marantika, J. E. R. (2021). Metacognitive ability and autonomous learning strategy in improving learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.17392
Martelletti, D. M., Luzuriaga, M., & Furman, M. (2023). ‘What makes you say so?’ Metacognition improves the sustained learning of inferential reading skills in English as a second language. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 33, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2023.100213
Mohamed, A., & Shaaban, T. (2023). investigating college students’ metacognitive awareness in enhancing ESP writing proficiency. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(2), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP230420029M
Mustopa, R. A., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Anshori, D. S. (2024). Investigating Senior High School Students’ metacognition in Indonesian learning reading comprehension: Does it have a positive impact? International Journal of Language Education, 8(2), 322–342. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i2.64112
Ozturk, N. (2024). Revisiting Flavell’s theory of metacognition for metacognitive responsiveness. Kuramsal E?itimbilim, 17(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1232284
Ozturk, N., & Senaydin, F. (2019). Dichotomy of EFL reading: Metacognition vs. proficiency. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(2), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.586757
Perry & Rahim. (2011). Studying self-regulated learning in classrooms. 122–136.
Potgieter, E., & van der Walt, M. (2022). Metacognitive awareness and the zone of proximal intermediate phase mathematics teachers’ professional development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12206
Razzak & Hamzah. (2023). Assessing metacognitive strategies: The influence of evaluation on writing performance among Pakistani ESL learners—A comprehensive mixed-methods study. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 48–62.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2023). Self-determination theory. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer International Publishing, 6229–6235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630
Sadykova, A., Iskakova, M., Ismailova, G., Ishmukhametova, A., Sovetova, A., & Mukasheva, K. (2024). The impact of a metacognition-based course on school students’ metacognitive skills and biology comprehension. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1460496. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1460496
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1–2), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
Setyaningsih, B., & Sumarni, S. (2023). Metacognition perceived in the education and English language education: A Systematic Literature Review. English Language, 6(1).
Stanton, J. D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(2), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Sukarelawan, Moh. I., Hidayat, P., & Widodo, W. (2024). Study of metacognitive awareness at the individual level of students across study programs using Rasch modeling. Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v11i1.748
Summiya. & Hussain, I. (2024). Relationship of metacognition with academic performance of prospective teachers: Modeling mediation effect of digital literacy. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(4), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i4.121
Swanson, H. J., Ojutiku, A., & Dewsbury, B. (2024). The impacts of an academic intervention based in metacognition on academic performance. Teaching and learning inquiry, 12. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.12
Teng, (Mark) Feng. (2020). Tertiary-level students’ English writing performance and metacognitive awareness: A group metacognitive support perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595712
Theobald, M. (2021). Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
Zepeda, C. D., Hlutkowsky, C. O., Partika, A. C., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2019). Identifying teachers’ supports of metacognition through classroom talk and its relation to growth in conceptual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000300
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Ishak, M., Oderinde, I., & Ahmad, S. (2025). The Role of Metacognitive Strategies in Enhancing Learning Outcomes and Educational Efficiency: A Systematic Review of Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed-Method Studies. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(4), 81–101.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode