ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The importance of entrepreneurship growth around the globe has been well recognized and documented by many scholars. For instance, some scholars have reported that the potential contribution of entrepreneurship growth to employment and income has been generally recognized. Entrepreneurs are widely recognized as the prime movers of economic development; the people who translate ideas into action. The government of Kenya has initiated numerous programs and policies to support entrepreneurship growth in Kenya. For instance, it has undertaken policy reviews that have led to reduction of the required licenses to start and operate a business. It has initiated several monetary funds to assist entrepreneurs, particularly youth and women, obtain financing for their enterprises i.e. the Youth Enterprise Fund, Women Enterprise Fund and Uwezo Fund. Private sector players such as commercial Banks, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) and Savings and Credit Co-operatives Societies (SACCOs) among others have also come up with formal financial support schemes for entrepreneurs. However the start- up failure rate is still very high and the desired growth levels are yet to be achieved. Consequently some scholars and policy makers have turned to business incubators and particularly university based business incubators as a possible boost to entrepreneurship growth through nurturing start-ups. A major area in the operation of an incubator is the selection criteria used to admit incubatees. This study aimed to find out the role of selection criteria into university based business incubators on entrepreneurship growth in Kenya. The six active university based business incubators in Kenya were investigated with a specific focus on all the fifty nine graduated incubatees from the said incubators. Census technique was used given that the total number of all graduated incubatees (59) could be adequately studied. The study used a semi structured questionnaire as the main tool of data collection. A combination of tools was used to analyze the data because whereas some aspects of the study were qualitative others were of a quantitative nature. Quantitative data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 21 software through descriptive statistics; measures of central tendency (mean and mode), measures of dispersion (standard deviation and variance) and inferential statistics. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. The study found out that the kind of selection criteria used by a university based business incubator has a significance impact (79.6%) on entrepreneurship growth. The study recommends among others, that the government through the Ministry of Education, and management of individual universities set up more university based business incubators given the positive potential effect they have on entrepreneurship growth. University based business incubators should continuously enrich their selection criteria in order to attract and incubate only the very potential incubatees. Further studies could be conducted on the role of selection criteria into other kinds business incubators – those not based in universities- on entrepreneurship growth.
Adegbite, O. (2001) Business Incubators and Small Enterprise Development: The Nigerian Experience, Small Business Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3 pp. 157 - 166. SpringerPublication
Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of Social Research. Belmont, BC: Wadsworth.
Bathula, H., Karia, M., & Abbott, M. (2011). The Role of University-Based Incubators in Emerging Economies. Working Paper No. 22
Becker, B., & Gassmann, O. (2006). Gaining leverage effects from knowledge modes within corporate incubators. R&D Management 36
Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008) Incubator best practice: a framework. Technovation 28:20–28
Chandra, A., & Chao, C. (2011). Growth and evolution of high-technology business incubation in China. Human Systems Management 30 55–69
Ciavarella, M. A., Buckholtz, A.K, Riordan, C. M., Gatewood, R. D., & Stokes, G. S. (2004) The big ?ve and venture survival: is there a linkage? Journal of Buinesss Venture 19:465–483
Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods, (11th, ed.). New Delhi: McGraw-Hill Publishing, Co. Ltd.
Djokovic, D., and Souitaris, V. (2006). Spinouts from Academic Institutions: A Literature Review with Suggestions for Further Research. Journal of Technology Transfer
Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Harper Collins, New York.
Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2): 111-121.
Kaiburi, S., Mobegi, O., Kombo, A., Omari, A., & Sewe, T. (2012). Entrepreneurship Challenges in Developing Economies: a case of Kenyan Economy. International Journal of Arts and Commerce Vol. 1 No. 4
Karanja, J. (2011). Improving water provision in Nairobi through control of non-revenue water. Global water summit 2011. Global Water Intelligence, 7, 212–213.
Lalkaka, R. (1997). Technology Business Incubators: Critical Determinants of Success. New York UNDP.
Marwanga, R. O. (2009). Technology and Business Incubation Technology and Business Incubation for Entrepreneurship in Kenya. Paper presented at the 10th Annual ICT Conference, Strathmore University, Kenya.
McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2007). Building Futures or Stealing Secrets? Entrepreneurial Cooperation and Con?ict Within Business Incubators. International Small Business Journal 25(4): 25–42.
McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in university science park incubators: The relationship between the start-ups’s lifecycle progression and the use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation 28(5): 277–290.
Minniti, M., Arenius, P., and Langowitz, N. (2013). 2004 Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Special Topic Report: Women and Entrepreneurship. Center for Women's Leadership at Babson College, Babson Park, MA.
Mugenda, A. G. (2011). Social science research; theory and principles. Nairobi: Act Press.
Mwobobia, F. (2012). The Challenges Facing Small-Scale Women Entrepreneurs: A Case of Kenya. International Journal of Business Administration Vol. 3, No. 2
National Business Incubation Association. (2013). The state of the business incubation industry 2012. Ohio: NBIA.
Salman, A., & Majeed, A. (2010) Sustainable Incubator Management—A Case Study for Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, Vol. 48, No. 4, Papers and Proceedings PARTS I and II The Silver Jubilee Annual General Meeting and Conference of the Pakistan Society of Development Economists Islamabad, March 16-18, 2010 (Winter 2009), pp. 425-438. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad
Wulung, R., Takahashi, K., & Morikawa, K. (2014). An interactive multi-objective incubate selection model incorporating incubator manager orientation. Springer Publication Online.
In-Text Citation: (Wachira et al., 2017)
To Cite this Article: Wachira, K., Ngugi, P., & Otieno, R. O. (2017). Incubatee Selection Criteria and its Role on Entrepreneurship Growth: A Survey of University Based Business Incubators in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(1), 28–38.
s
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode