ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The current research explored the utility maximization concept of teaching effectiveness of economics with the application of the student ratings of instruction (SRI) measuring device at a university in the southeastern US. The research methodology was quantitative, and the data were the 175 students’ responses on definite items of teaching efficiency for the spring 2017 semester SRI survey at the university. Using the Cronbach’s alpha statistic, the results disclosed the alpha for the 15 items on the measuring scale, which in all evaluated teaching efficiency and student motivation at the university was about .95, suggesting the items established a measuring scale that had applied internal stability dependability for the SRI design. Additionally, applying the principal axis factoring with varimax rotation, suggested the two indexes of teaching effectiveness and student self-motivation had robust positive loadings of > .40, and significantly interlinked with teaching effectiveness and student learning success. Consequently, this sanctioned the construct validity of the SRI measuring design in evaluating teaching quality. However, the research was restricted to one semester analysis of the SRI design, which may be insufficient to confirm the generalizability of the design as a measurement of teaching effectiveness. Subsequent scholarships must embrace additional semesters for a comprehensive generalizability.
Agbetsiafa, D. (2010). Evaluating effective teaching in college level economics using student ratings of instruction: A factor analytic approach. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(5), 57-66. Retrieved from https://www.cluteinstitute.com/journals/journal-of-college-teaching-learning-tlc/
Alauddin, M., & Butler, J. (2004). Teaching economics in a changing university environment: Some Australian experience. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(7), 706-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290410540891
Anastasiadou, S. D. (2011). Reliability and validity testing of a new scale for measuring attitudes toward learning statistics with technology. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 4(1), 1-10. Retrieved from http://adn.teaching.ro/
Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Apodaca, P., & Grad, H. (2005). The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: Integration of uni-and multidimensional models. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 723-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500340101
Barry, R. A. (2010). Teaching effectiveness and why it matters. Marylhurst, OR: Marylhurst University and the Chalkboard Project. Retrieved from https://chalkboardproject.org/sites/default/files/teacher-effectiveness-and-why-it-matters.pdf
Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Becker, W. E. (2004). Economics for a higher education. International Review of Economics Education, 3(1), 52-62. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-review-of-economics-education
Beran, T., & Rokosh, J. (2009). Instructors’ perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction. Instructional Science, 37(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2
Beran, T., & Violato C. (2005). Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500260688
Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13(3), 327–347. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/learning-and-instruction/
Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Robinson, W. (2005). Assessing teacher effectiveness: Developing a differentiated model. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
Chen, Y., & Hoshower, L. B. (2003). Student evaluation of teaching effectiveness: An assessment of student perception and motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 71-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000033071
Chen, G., & Watkins, D. (2010). Stability and correlates of student evaluations of teaching at a Chinese university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(6), 675-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902977715
Cohen, P. A. (1981) Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281–309. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/home/rre
Colander, D. (2004). The art of teaching economics. International Review of Economics Education, 3(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1477-3880(15)30144-4
Courtney, R. H., Lee, W., & Boatman, K. (2013). Improving teaching effectiveness in introductory economics courses using the test of understanding of college economics (TUCE). Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 14(1), 55-70. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org
/journals/journal-of-economics-and-economic-education-research-home.html
Deiter, R. (2000). The use of humor as a teaching tool in the classroom. North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture, 44(2), 20-27. Retrieved from https:/
In-Text Citation: (Mansaray, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Mansaray, M. A. (2018). Utility Maximization Model of Teaching Effectiveness in Economics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 377–400.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode