ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Malaysia is one of those countries that rely on petroleum-based revenues as one of its main sources of national income. The majority of its oil fields are found in the coasts of Kelantan, Terengganu, Sabah and Sarawak. Upon the discovery of these, Malaysia had incorporated a national petroleum company named “Petronas” on 17th August 1974 to manage all related matters to exploration and exploitation of petroleum in the country. Subsequently, on 1st October 1974, the Parliament had passed Petroleum Development Act 1974 that, inter alia, gives the power and right for exploration and exploitation of petroleum to Petronas and to pay 5% of oil royalty to the petroleum-producing states. However, due to ideological differences between the federal government and the state government of Kelantan, this lucrative natural source has found itself at the center of conflict between the two. The study analyzes the implication of such a petroleum-based conflict against the federal-state relations within a context of a democratic Malaysia. In order to so, as far as oil royalty payment arrangement is concerned, the concept of federalism was applied as a tool of analysis to evaluate the extent of the effectiveness of the relations between the federal government and the state government of Kelantan. Pursuant to that, the discussion of this study revolves around qualitative data approach based on documents related to the oil royalty agreement between the federal government and state government of Kelantan. The analysis has indicated that Malaysia, as a federalist country, has failed to put into practice the true concept of federalism. One of the major reasons behind this was conflicting political interests. The impacts of such could be seen from the distinctive way the federal government treated the state governments, in this case Kelantan, whose state government was formed by the opposition political party. The Malaysian federal government's extensive power and the different constitutional interpretation also contributes to the conflict especially in the context of the federal legislative policies that often being perceived as discriminating against the state government.
Abidin, A. Z. (2000). Petronas dan Industri petroleum Malaysia. Jabatan Hal EhwaL
Awam: Kuala Lumpur.
Agenda Daily Online. (2014). Royalti: Mahkamah Persekutuan tolak rayuan Kelantan. 24
Julai 2014. Dalam http://www.agendadaily.com/Pilihanraya/royalti-mahkamah-persekutuan-tolak-rayuan-kelantan.html (20 September 2017)
Birch, A. A. (1957). Federalism, finance and social legislation in Canada, Australia and the United
States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elazar, D. J. (2008). Federalism and the way to peace, Institute of Intergovermenmental
Relations. Kington: Institute of Intergovermenmental Relations.
Livingston, W. S. (1956). Federalism and Constitutional change. Oxford: Clarendon.
Laws of Malaysia. (2006). Petroleum Development Act 1974. Kuala Lumpur: Nasional Printing
Malaysia.
Laws of Malaysia. (2012). Territorial Sea Act 2012. Kuala Lumpur: Nasional Printing
Malaysia.
Laws of Malaysia. (2012). Emergency Ordinance Act 1969. Kuala Lumpur: Nasional Printing
Malaysia.
Malaysiakini. (2015). Kelantan bentang bajet defisit RM 45 juta. 3 November 2015. Dalam
https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/318272 (atas talian pada 20 September 2017)
Mohamad, N. A. (2013). Kedudukan tanah dan sumber hasil menurut perlembagaan
persekutuan Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia.
Kelantan, P. M. B. (2016). http://www.pmbk.gov.my/index.php/ms/.
20/3/2018
Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: origin, operation, significance. Bostan: Little Brown.
Riker, W. H. (1975). Federalism. In Fred 1 Greenstein, N.W. eds. Governmental institutions and
processes: handbook of political science, Vol.5. London: Wesley Publishing.
Utusan Malaysia Online. 2016. PAS Kelantan bentang bajet deficit 2017. 26 Oktober.
Dalam https://m.utusan.com.my/berita/wilayah/kelantan/pas-kelantan-bentang-bajet-defisit-2017-1.399558 (atas talian pada 15 September 2017)
Wheare, K. C. (1967). Federal Government. London: Oxford University Press.
In-Text Citation: (Zawawi, Yaakop, Zakaria, Zakaria, & Hasnul, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Zawawi, H. Y., Yaakop, M. R. M., Zakaria, J., Zakaria, A., & Hasnul, A. A. (2018). The Implications of Petroleum Conflict in the Context of the Federal Government and the Kelantan State Government Relations. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(5), 123–131.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode