ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Environmental management support as well as engagement in environmental awareness activities are imperative in ensuring the well-being of the urban community towards sustainable development. Hence, this study examines the level of environmental management support, involvement in environmental activities and the well-being of the environment based on the perceptions of urban community living in the Klang Valley and its differences based on gender and education level. This survey research uses questionnaire as research instrument. A total of 2502 respondents participated in the study, representing six Municipal Councils (MC) in the Klang Valley in Malaysia namely the Klang Municipal Council, Kajang MC, Subang Jaya MC, Selayang MC, Sepang MC and Ampang Jaya MC. Data collected involves descriptive statistics and inferential (two-way MANOVA) analysed using the SPSS version 21. The findings show that urban communities feel that the support for environmental management is moderately low while involvement in environmental activities is at a moderately high level. The well-being of the community environment is also at a moderately high level. There is no significant difference between management support, involvement in environmental activities and the well-being of the community based on gender. However, there is a significant difference in the aspect of environmental management support between the respondents who have certificate as compared to those who have diploma and degree. Respondents who have certificates felt there is less support towards environmental management as compared to those who have a diploma or a degree. Overall, this study suggests that communities need environmental management support in their residential areas in terms of environmental management facilities. In addition, environmental management activities as well as maintenance in community settings need to be enhanced in the areas of low-income urban community to achieve a well-being community as well as to ensure sustainable development.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). The developing ecology of human development: Paradigm lost
orparadigm regained. In U. Bronfenbrenner (Ed.), Making human beings human: Bioecologicalperspectives on human development (pp. 94–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Carrier, S. J. (2004). Gender Differences in Attitudes toward Environmental Science. School
Science and Mathematics, 107(7), 271-278.
Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Colman, A. M., Norris, C. E., & Preston, C. C. (1997). Comparing rating scales of different
lengths: Equivalence of scores from 5-point and 7-point scales. Psychological Reports, 80, 355-362.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. 6th edn.
London: Routledge.
Gralton, A., Sinclair, M., & Purnell, K. (2004). Changes in attitudes, beliefs and
behavior: a critical review of research into the impacts of environmental education initiatives. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 20 (2), 41-52.
Jorgensen, D. L. (1989). Participant observation: methodology for human studies. Newbury,
CA: Sage.
Kartini, A. T. (2016). Konsep, dasar dan perlaksanaan Bandar Sejahtera dengan rujukan khas kepada Malaysia. GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12 (7), 26 – 33.
Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L., & Nadeau, S. (2009). Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern in Canada. Rural Sociology, 74(3), 309–329.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind The Gap: Why Do People Act
Environmentally And What Are The Barriers To Environmental Behavior? Environmental Educational Research, 8 (3), 239-260.
Krejcie, R. V., dan Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sampel size for research activities.
Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30 (3), 607-610.
Midgley, J. (1995). Social development: the development perspective in social welfare.
London: Sage Publication
Konting, M. M. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Muhamad, F. N. (2003). Penilaian dampak pembangunan ke arah kesejahteraan masyarakat; penilaian dampak sosial. Utusan Publication & Distributor, Kuala Lumpur.
Nunnally, J. C. (1997). The study of change evaluation research: principle conserning measurement experimental design and analysis. Dlm. Struening, E.L & Guttentag, M. (pnyt). Handbook of Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Pain, R., & Townshend, T. (2002). A safer city centre for all? senses of ‘community safety’ in newcastle upon tyne. Geoforum 33, 105-119.
Prabawa, S. K., & Baudains, C. (2012). Asking the participants: students’ views on their environmental attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(2), 219–228.
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Social capital. measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2:41-51.
Robert, O. A. L. (2008). Progress in sustainable development research. Nova Science Publisher Inc.
Sham, S. (2001). Developing urban sustainability indicators for Malaysia. LESTARI Public Lecture, No 3. Bangi: LESTARI (UKM).
Rahman, S. F. A. (2006). Kriteria kualiti hidup berkeluarga [cited 29 November
2010]. Available from: http://www.ikim.gov.my/bm/paparmedia.php?key=781.
Afrizal, T., & Embong, A. R. (2013). Komuniti dan pengurusan persekitaran: beberapa pengalaman malaysia, bangladesh, zambia dan vietnam. Kajian Malaysia, 31 (2): 65–86.
Tiwi, K., Noraznan, M., & Tay, T. P. (2006). Penglibatan guru pelatih KPLI maktab perguruan batu lintang dalam amalan gaya hidup mesra alam. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPBL 7.
Unit Perancang Ekonomi, JPM. (1999). Indeks Kualiti Hidup Malaysia (MQLI). Putrajaya Perspective (Boulder, CO, West- view), pp. 8-51.
Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for
Tourism & Research Develop
In-Text Citation: (Ahmad, Ahmad, Rahman, & Malek, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Ahmad, J., Ahmad, A. R., Rahman, N. A., & Malek, J. A. (2018). Environmental Management Support and Participation in Environmental Activities for the Well-being of Urban Community. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 102–115.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode