Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Influence of Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy on Perceived Firm Performance in Telecommunication Sector in Rwanda

Venerande Kayirangwa, G. S. Namusonge, Julius Warren Kule

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4328

Open access

This study is concerned with Influence of philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility strategy on Perceived firm Performance in telecommunication sector in Rwanda. To analyze the influence of strategic philanthropic on the targeted telecom firms’ performance is the specific objective of the work. Qualitative and quantitative research design are used and performed by primary and secondary data collected from the targeted companies’ managers and staff in charge of CSR through interview and questionnaires, and reports provided by these telecom companies and RURA recorded during years 2012-2016. Targeted population of the study was 228 managers and CSR related staff from MTN Rwanda (110), TIGO Rwanda (80) and AIRTEL Rwanda (38) to give sample size of 145 staff in question found by using stratified random sampling and all questionnaires were distributed where 114 of them were retrieved representing 79.1%. This work used both inferential and descriptive statistics, and data are treated by using Excel and SPSS package while regressed model and correlation coefficients were utilized to analyze the relationship between variables. Results found show that all the telecommunication companies in Rwanda had the focus of improving the education, health and economic empowerment system in accomplishment of government priorities and they gained the public confidence, thus improve firm’s image and reputation, increasing or retention of potential customers, benefited competitive advantage, and then after their profits. The findings revealed that, in combination with other factors like quality management, committed staff, quality and quantity of products, business environment, etc., CSR practices may improve perceived firm’s performance.

Behrens, T. R. (2009). Editorial. The Foundation Review, 1(1), 4-5.
Brest, P. (2010). The power of theories of change. Stanford Social Innovation Review.
http://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_power_of_theories_of_change
Carroll, A. B. (1979). Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Journal of Academy of Management, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Sage journal, pp.268-295.
Carton, R. B., & Hofer, C. W. (2006). Measuring Organizational Performance: Metrics for Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Research. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton
Colby, S., Stone, N., & Carttar, P. (2004). Zeroing in on impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Available
Dagwom, Y. D. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and community relations in Nigeria. Journal of Business Management and Economics, 2(7), 121-127.
Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibility? Journal of California Management , 2(4), 70-76.
DeGeorge, R. T. (2010). Business Ethics. 7th. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education,
Inc. 200. Print
Forti, M. (2012). Six theory of change pitfalls to avoid. Stanford Social Innovation Review, http://ssir.org/articles/entry/six_theory_of_change_pitfalls_to_avoid
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13(13), 32-33.
Githinji, R. K. (2015). The Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies and Activities Employed By the Equity Bank in Kenya to Improve Its Performance. Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 28-32.
Guus, W., Gemma, B., Ine, C., &Femke, N. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility in the agro-food sector. Amsterdam: Utrecht University.
Hamid, F., & Ruhaya, A. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility by the Malaysian Telecommunication Firms. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(5), 198 - 208.
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2001). Toward a model of corporate social strategy formulation. New York: Academy of Management.
John, E. N., Victor, A. & Umoh, M. . (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Mobile Telecommunication Competitiveness in Nigeria: The Case of MTN Nigeria. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management,, 5(5), 527-537.
Maimunah, I. (2009). Social responsibility and its role in community development. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(9), pp.64 - 72.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 268-305.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance. innovation and use. NewYork: Guildford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance. innovation and use. NewYork: Guildford Press.
Patrizi, P., & Patton, M. Q. (Eds.) (2010). Evaluating Strategy, New Directions for Evaluation, Number 128.
Rwanda Utilities and regulatory authority. (2015). Statistics And Tariff Information In Telecom Sector As Of March 2015 . Kigali- Rwanda: Economic and Market Analysis Section (Rwanda Utilities and regulatory authority).
Secchi, D. (2005). The Italian experience in social reporting: An empirical analysis. Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(1), 135-149.
Shoukat,M. & Muhammad, N. (2014). Impact of corporate social responsibility on the financial performance of banks in Pakistan. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 21(9), 9-19.
Sweta, S. (2010). Philanthropy to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Indian Perspective. Journal of of International Com

In-Text Citation: (Kayirangwa, Namusonge, & Kule, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Kayirangwa, V., Namusonge, G. S., & Kule, J. W. (2018). Influence of Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy on Perceived Firm Performance in Telecommunication Sector in Rwanda. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(7), 116–132.