Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Perceptions of Stakeholders in Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility in Tanzania

Ahmad Mtengwa Burhan, Mayasa Mussa Kalinga

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i9/4674

Open access

For a corporate to survive in a competitive market environment, it must ensure the needs of its stakeholders are given the first priority. Every corporate is obliged to take a responsible part in a community so as to afford a life time existence of its products and the life of its society in general. This can simply be termed as Corporate Social responsibility. It is an obvious fact however, that while most companies have been practicing corporate social responsibility, other companies have been irresponsible to their societies and to the environment surrounding them.
The aim of this study was therefore to understand stakeholders’ perceptions, regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in their societies. Whereas, using an Explorative Factor Analysis study in beverage industries in Tanzania, we found corporate support and corporate geniality is influencing factors for company’s social responsibility. While, Corporate Environmental Management and Corporate Safety Management were said to influence corporate social irresponsibility.
This study later recommended on producing socially desirable products and services as the suggested central goal for every company. And second, because moral and environmental pollutions may sometimes be inevitable to abstain, companies were recommended to take responsible compensations if in any case pollutions occurred.

1. Amstrong, .J. S., (1977), Social Irresponsibility in Management: Journal of business research.
2. Baucus, M. and Baucus, D. (1997). ‘Paying the piper: an empirical examination of longer term financial consequences for illegal corporate behaviour’, Academy of Management Journal, 40, pp. 129-151.
3. Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibility of the businessman. Harper and Row, New York
4. Bowmann-Larsen, L and Wiggen, O., (2004). Responsibility in World Business: Managing harmful side -effect of corporate activity. USA: United Nation University press.
5. Calo, R. (1974) The Boundaries of Privacy Harm. http://ilj.law.indiana.edu/articles/86/86_3_Calo.pdf. Retrieved on 26 September 2018
6. Caroll, A. B (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of management review 4.
7. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibility? California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
8. Fort, T. L., (1999). The first man and the company man. The common good, transcendence and mediating institution, America business law journal
9. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston (MA)
10. Friedman, (1970). The social responsibility of business in to increase its profits. New York Times Magazines, 13 Sept., 32-33.
11. Garriga, E. and Mele, D (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory journal of business ethics, Av Pearson 21 Barcelona.
12. Hopkins, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: An issue paper: Policy integration department World commission on the social dimension of globalization international labour office, Geneva
13. Kemp, D. (2003). Discovery participatory development through corporate NGO Collaboration: A mining industries case: Center for social responsibility in mining research. University of Queensland Australia.
14. Kotchen, M. J. and Moon, J. J (2011) Corporate Social Responsibility for Irresponsibility Working Paper Series. Retrieved on 26 September 2018, http://www.nber.org/papers/w17254
15. Kothari C. R (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and techniques 2nd Revised Ed. Jaipur India
16. Kotler P. & Armstrong G. 2006. Principles of marketing, (11th Ed.) Upper Saddle River: New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
17. Leedy, P. and Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
18. Mele, D, (2002). Not only stakeholder interest the firm oriented toward the common good: University of Notre Dame press. Notre Dame
19. Mullin, L. J (2005). Management and Organisation Behaviour. 7th Ed Pearson education limited, Essex, England.
20. Murray, K. B. and Vogel C. M, (1997). Using a hierarchy of effect approach to gauge the effective of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: financial versus non-financial impact, journal of business research vol. 38
21. NEXEN CNOOC LTD, (2011). Building Residence responsibility: Social Responsibility Report.
22. O'Riordan, L. and Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Models and Theories in Stakeholder Dialogue: Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 83, No. 4 (Dec., 2008), pp. 745-758
23. Pallant, J 2001, SPSS survival manual: a step by step to data analysis using SPSS, Allen & Unwin, Australia
24. Pamler, A. and Hartely (2002). The Business Environment. McGrawHill, New York
25. Parmar, B.L., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Purnell, L. and De Colle, S. (2010) ‘Stakeholder theory: the state of the art’, The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.403–445
26. Smith, N. C. (1999), “Ethics and the Typology of Consumer Value,” in Consumer Value: A Framework for Analysis and Research, Morris B. Holbrook, Ed. New York: Rout ledge, 147- 58.
27. Wheelen, L. T and Hunger, D .J (2010). Strategic Management and Business Policy 12thed, Pearson education.
28. Wheelen, Thomas L., & Hunger J. David (2010). St

In-Text Citation: (Burhan & Kalinga, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Burhan, A. M., & Kalinga, M. M. (2018). Perceptions of Stakeholders in Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility in Tanzania. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 988–1003.