ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The purpose of this study attempts to discuss selected related theories on profanity and its influence towards the daily communication. It explains and reviews theory of sociolinguistics and self-perception theory with regard to use of profanity in daily communications. Sociolinguistic theory discusses the interconnection between language and society. It also elaborates on how every person uses a language and speaks in a particular way as part of their socio-cultural act. The focus of self-perception theory is on attitude formation developed by psychologist and it emphasizes on the development of people’s attitude. In addition, this theory emphasizes that people induce attitudes without accessing internal cognition as well as mood states.
Baldwin, S. A., & Hoffman, J. P. (2002). The dynamics of self-esteem: A growth-curve analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(2), 101-113.
Bonvillain, N. (1993). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
Baron, N. S. (2005). Instant messaging and the future of language. ABOUT, 719.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological review, 88(4), 354.
Brown H. Douglas, (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Fourth Edition, Longman.
Cavanna, A. E., & Rickards, H. (2013). The psychopathological spectrum of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(6), 1008-1015.
Critcher, C. R., & Gilovich, T. (2010). Inferring attitudes from mindwandering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1255-1266.
Emler, N. (2001). Self-esteem: The costs and causes of low self-esteem. York, UK: York Publishing Services for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Fairclough, N. (2001). The discourse of new labour: Critical discourse analysis. Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, 1, 229-266.
Fasold, R. (1993). The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The spyglass self: a model of vicarious self-perception. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3), 402.
Guadagno, R. E., Lankford, A., Muscanell, N. L., Okdie, B. M., & McCallum, D. M. (2010). Social influence in the online recruitment of terrorists and terrorist sympathizers: Implications for Social Psychology Research. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 23(1), 25-56.
Holmes, J. (1992), An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman (p.1).
James, W. (2013). The principles of psychology. Read Books Ltd.
Jay, T. (1992). Cursing in America: A psycholinguistic study of dirty language in the courts, in the movies, in the schoolyards and on the streets. Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jay, T., Janschewitz, K. (2008). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 4, 267–288.
Jay, T. (2009). The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 153–161.
Jay, T., Caldwell-Harris, C., King, K. (2008). Recalling taboo and nontaboo words. The American Journal of Psychology, 121, 83–103.
Mabry, L. (2008). Case study in social research. The SAGE handbook of social research methods, 214-227.
Mercer, N. (2002). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.
Mruk, C. J. (2006). Self-esteem research, theory, and practice: Toward a positive psychology of self-esteem (3rd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing.
Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 3-21.
Rickford, John R. (2001), Style and stylizing from the perspective of a non autonomous Sociolinguistics. In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, (ed.).
Russell, L. (2011). Understanding Pupil Resistance-Integrating Gender, Ethnicity and Class: an Educational Ethnography. E & E Publishing.
Stone, T. E., McMillan, M., & Hazelton, M. (2015). Back to swear one: A review of English language literature on swearing and cursing in Western health settings. Aggression and violent behavior, 25, 65-74.
Sylwester, K., Purver, M. (2015). Twitter language use reflects psychological differences between democrats and republicans.
Thomas, M. (1991). Universal grammar and the interpretation of reflexives in a second language. Language, 211-239.
Vingerhoets, A. J., Bylsma, L. M., & De Vlam, C. (2013). Swearing: A biopsychosocial perspective. Psihologijske teme, 22(2), 287-304.
Wardhaugh, R. (2011). An introduction to sociolinguistics (Vol. 28). John Wiley & Sons.
In-Text Citation: (Ashwindren, Shankar, & Zarei, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Ashwindren, S., Shankar, V., & Zarei, N. (2018). Selected Theories on the Use of Profanity. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(9), 1975–1982.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode