ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Planning a university-based distance education was once considered a marginalized practice in higher education institutions (HEIs). However, many changes have since taken place in HEIs, not only from procedural and technological aspects, but also involving structural and cultural systemic changes in the existing organizational and educational practices. Universities are now expected to deliver courses not only in traditional face-to-face format, but to also inculcate various forms of distance and flexible learning as part of their course delivery to the students. Understanding context is an important aspect in program planning. By assessing the current context of distance education practice in higher education, this paper seeks to propose a program planning model as a theoretical guide for supporting the development of a successful learning design for distance learners, particularly for undergraduate courses. The first part of this paper discussed a selected program planning model from the adult education literature. The second part of this paper elaborates each of the planning component as supported the distance education literature. This paper concludes with a proposed skeletal model, specifically for designing online courses at the end.
Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Viñes, J. M. (2005). An instructional model for web?based e?learning education with a blended learning process approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 217-235. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 12-25.
Bonk, C. J., & Dennen, V. P. (2007). Frameworks for design and instruction. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (2nd ed. ed., pp. 233-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boone, E. J., Safrit, R. D., & Jones, J. (2002). Developing programs in adult education: A conceptual programming model (2nd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Brown, J. S. (1990). Toward a new epistemology for learning. In C. Frasson, & G. Gauthier (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: At the crossroad of artificial intelligence and education (pp. 266-282). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Brown, J. S., & Dugurd, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Caffarella, R. S. (2002). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers, and staff developers (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1994). Planning responsibly for adult education: A guide to negotiating power and interests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (1998). Working the planning table: The political practice of adult education. Studies in Continuing Education, 20(1), 5-21. doi: 10.1080/0158037980200101
Cervero, R. M., & Wilson, A. L. (2006). Working the planning table: Negotiating democratically for adult, continuing and workplace education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chau, P. (2010). Online higher education commodity. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(3), 177-191. doi: 10.1007/s12528-010-9039-y
Clark, R. E. (2000). Evaluating distance education: Strategies and cautions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 1(1), 3-16.
Cohen, V. L. (2003). A model for assessing distance learning instruction. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(2), 98-120. doi: 10.1007/BF02940940
Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gboku, M., & Lekoko, R. N. (2007). Developing programmes for adult learners in Africa. Hamburg, Germany: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C., & Carabajal, K. (2000, February). Evaluating online learning: Models and methods. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) Conference, San Diego, CA.
Hanna, D. E. (2003). Organizational models in higher education, past and future. In M. G. Moore, & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 67-78). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1–2), 41-61. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4
Hofstede, G. (2004). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Ibarra, R. A. (2001). Beyond affirmative action: Reframing the context of higher education. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Kelderman, E. (2011, November 6). Online programs face new demands from accreditors. Chronicles of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com.prox.lib.ncsu.edu/article/Online-Programs-Face-New/129608/
Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7-19. doi: 10.1007/BF03024963
K
In-Text Citation: (Abdrahim, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Abdrahim, N. A. (2018). Program Planning Model: A Theoretical Guide for Designing Online Distance Education Courses. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 46–67.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode