ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The purpose of this study was to discover the relative effectiveness of different types of reading strategies on measures of reading comprehension performance for students with different learning styles. Students were separated into four learning style groups (active, sensitive, visual and sequential) based on their scores on the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire. The results indicated that students with varying learning styles responded differently to the reading strategies tested in the study. Active learners performed better than other groups when using the keyword and question and answer strategy but performed significantly worse than other groups with the rereading strategy. Sensitive and sequential learners on the other hand performed better than other groups with the rereading strategy. Visual learners did well with the keyword strategy.Of the strategies tested, only the keyword strategy showed consistently positive results for all learning style groups. Each group scored higher on the keyword condition than on the control condition. Hence use of the keyword strategy is highly recommended in classroom environments and incorporating the keywords into texts to make texts easier to understand is a viable method for improving comprehension. The question and answer strategy should be used with caution as it results in sub-par comprehension for learning styles other than the active learning style. Similarly the rereading strategy which works well for sensitive and sequential learners should also be used only for these learners as it confuses active learners. In a nutshell, a student’s learning preference will influence the way information is processed and thus selecting and using appropriate reading strategies is essential to ensure the best possible results.
Anderson, T. (2005). Distance learning–Social software’s killer app? Australia: The Open & Distance Learning Association of Australia
Atkinson, R. C. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1969). Storage and Retrieval Processes in Long-Term Memory. Psychological Review. Vol 76(2), Mar 1969, 179-193.
Avila, E. & Sadoski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language learning, 46(3), 379-395.
Baker, S., Gersten, R. & Grossen, B. (2002). Interventions for students with reading comprehension problems. Interventions for Academic and Behaviour Problems II: Preventive and Remedial Approaches.
Barrett, T. C. (1976). Taxonomy of reading comprehension. In Teaching reading in the middle class. eds. Smith R. And Barrett, T. C. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley.
Benito, Y. M., Foley, C. L., Lewis, C. D. & Prescott, P. (1993). The effect of instruction in question?answer relationships and metacognition on social studies comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 16(1), 20-29.
Block, C. C. & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Research on teaching comprehension: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices, 2, 19-37.
Block, C. C., Parris, S. R. & Whiteley, C. S. (2008). CPMs: A kinesthetic comprehension strategy. The reading teacher, 61(6), 460-470.
Businessballs Inc., (2007). Learning and Development resource for people and organizations, Chapman, A. Leicester, England. [Accessed on 6 November 2007]. Available: http://www.businessballs.com/kolblearningstyles.htm
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman.
Cornis-Pope, M. & Woodlief, A. (2003). The rereading/rewriting process: Theory and collaborative, on-line pedagogy. Intertexts: Reading pedagogy in college writing classrooms, 146-164.
DeCourcy, M. & Birch, G. (1993). Reading and Writing Strategies Used in a Japanese Immersion Program.
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston: Pearson
Duke, N., Pearson, D., Strachan, S. & Billman, A. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. What research has to say about reading instruction, 51- 93.
Ellis, M. (1996). The Missing Link: Academic Study Skills – Between ESL and University Courses. In Jayakaran Mukundan & Teh Chee Seng (eds.). Trends in English Language Teaching. (pp. 117-121) Universiti Putra Malaysia Press, Serdang.
Ezell, H. K., Hunsicker, S. A., Quinque, M. M. & Randolph, E. (1996). Maintenance and generalization of QAR reading comprehension strategies.Literacy Research and Instruction, 36(1), 64-81.
Ezell, H. K., Hunsicker, S. A. & Quinque, M. M. (1997). Comparison of two strategies for teaching reading comprehension skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 365-382.
Fagan, B. (2003). Scaffolds to Help ELL Readers. Voices from the Middle, 11(1), 38-42.
Faust, M. A. & Glenzer, N. (2000). "I could read those parts over and over": Eighth graders rereading to enhance enjoyment and learning with literature.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 234-239.
Fehrenbach, C. R. (1991). Gifted/Average Readers Do They Use The Same Reading Strategies?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 125-127.
Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. (1988) “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.” Engr. Education, Vol 78(7), 674-681.
Felder R. M. & Soloman, B. A. Index of learning styles questionnaire. 2003. [Accessed December 24, 2008]. http:// www.engr.ncsu.edu/ learningstyles /ilsweb. html.
Finch, A. (2003). Reflective instruments for self-assessment in Korean EFL classrooms. Korea TESOL, 6(1), 63.
Graf, S., Liu, T. C., Chen, N. S. & Yang, S. J. (2009). Learning styles and cognitive traits–Their relationship and its benefits in web-based educationalsystems. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1280-1289.
Green, M. (1998) Rapid retrieval of information: reading aloud with a purpose. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 44(3), 234-239
Grossman, P., Loeb, S
In-Text Citation: (Swan, Wong, Ayub, & Hussin, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Swan, C. K., Wong, S. L., Ayub, A. F. M., & Hussin, H. (2018). Reading Strategies Effect on Reading Comprehension Performance of ESL Learners. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 231–257.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode