ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the supervisory relationship and contextual supervision factors on supervision outcomes among trainee counsellors. There were 120 trainee counsellor respondents and 18 supervisors from four universities UM, UUM, UMT and UMS. The respondents were selected using the stratified random sampling technique. This study utilized the correlational research design. His research revealed there was no significant correlations between supervision contextual factors (supervisees’ and supervisors’ counselling orientation and supervisees’ cultural knowledge and awareness) and supervision outcomes. There were several recommendations outlined by the study which included, (i) the supervision contextual factors (cultural knowledge and awareness) should be examined from the supervisors’ perspective, (ii) future researchers should personally give explanations to the respondents when conducting the question and answer sessions and (iii) future researchers could also expand this investigation by examining the differences between supervision interaction of the supervisors and the supervisees.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (1986). Introduction to research education. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data: USA.
Borders, L., D. & Brown, L. L. (2005). The New Handbook of Counseling Supervision. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: New Jersey.
Breaux, W. W. (2005). The relationship between the cultural competence of counsellor supervisors and the satisfaction with supervision of their supervisees. PhD Dissertation. New Orleans University.
Brown, M. T., & Landrum-Brown, J. (1995). Counselor supervision: Cross-cultural perspectives. In J. G. Ponterotto, J. M. Casas, L. A. Suzuki, & C. M. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (pp. 263-286). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Caplan, R.D., and Jones, K.W. (1975). Effects of Work Load, Role Ambiguity, and Type A Personality on Anxiety, Depression, and Heart Rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 713-719.
Chang, C. Y., Hays, D. G., & Shoffner, M, F, (2003). Cross-racial supervision: A developmental approach for White supervisors working with supervisees of colour. The Clinical Supervisor, 22, 121-138. doi:10.1300/J001v22n02_08
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Second Edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Cohen, J., (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale NJ:Erlbaum.
Duan, C., & Roehlke, H. (2001). Assessing the barriers and changes of cross cultural supervision: A case study: Counsellor Education & Supervision, 38, 191-204.
Gatmon (2001). Issues and challenges of different multicultural supervision triads. Power Point Presentation from Chia—Chih DC Wang. University of Missouri Kansas City. USA.
Gelso, C. J. & Carter, J., A. (1985). The relationship in counselling and psychotherapy: Components consequences, and theoretical antecedents. The Counselling Psychologist, 13, 155-243.
Green, M. S., & Dekkers, T. D. (2010). Attending to power and diversity in supervision: An exploration of supervisee learning outcomes and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, vol. 22, 293-312.
Green, M., S., & Dekkers, T., D. (2010). Attending to power and diversity in supervision: An exploration of supervisee learning outcomes and satisfaction with supervision. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, vol. 22, 293-312.
Iannelli, R. J. (2000). A structural equation modeling examination of the relationship between counseling self-efficacy, counseling outcome expectations, and counselor performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Inman, A.G. (2006).Supervisor multicultural competent and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32, 73-85.
Jackson, J., L., Jr. (2010). Theoretical counseling orientation: An initial aspect of professional orientation and identity. PhD Dissertation. University of Alabama.
Ladany, N., & Bradley, J., B. (2010). Counselor Supervision. Taylor & Francis: New York.
Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., Friedlander, M. L., & Stern, M. (1992). The supervisory working alliance: Its relation to trainee self-efficacy and satisfaction with supervision. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Lochner, B. T., & Melchert, T. P. (1997). Relationship of cognitive style and theoretical orientation to psychology interns? preferences for supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(2), 256-260.
Konting, M. M. (2004). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Dawana Sdn.Bhd.: Kuala Lumpur.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. Mc Graw Hill: New York.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: explanation and prediction.Holt, Riehart and Winston, Inc: New York.
Ponterotto, J., G., Gretchen, D., Utsey,
In-Text Citation: (Ghazali, Jaafar, Tarmizi, & Noah, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Ghazali, N. M., Jaafar, W. M. W., Tarmizi, R. A., & Noah, S. M. (2018). The Relationship between Supervision Contextual Factors and Supervision Outcomes. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1059–1072.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode