ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The study was conducted to determine the value of non wood forest products to the socioeconomic of local communities in Kelawat Kota Belud Sabah which is to identify the importance and uses of bamboo and rattan in the livehood of villagers also the advantage of using these products. Respondents surveyed were residents of four villages in Kelawat which is Ponopuan Village, Kelawat Village, Sumbilingon Village and Pangi Village. Data was collected by a questionnaire survey and interviews with respondents. From the research, a total of 102 respondents surveyed are involved in the use of bamboo and rattan. 33 (32.4%) of them use bamboo and rattan as a source of their income for socioeconomic while 69 (67.6%) others used bamboo and rattan for their own consumption. A total of 73 villagers agreed and strongly agreed that bamboo and rattan help in improving their socioeconomy. Bamboo and rattan are mainly used for handicrafts, followed by the manufacturing furniture and house construction, as well as source of food and other uses, for example musical instruments. Percentage of average total income of bamboo and rattan sales with the total income per month was 31.85% which concluded that bamboo and rattan give an important value to help in improving the socioeconomy of local communities.
Abd Latif, M. & Abd. Razak, O. (1998). Bamboo as an Alternative Planted and Industrial Material to Timber in Malaysia: Yield, Production and Utilization Points of View. San Jose, Costa Rica.
Mohmod, L. (2004).R&D Needs Related to Bamboo and Rattan Small Enterprises. Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) Kepong 52109 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
Ahmed, A. (2007). Indigenous Use of Non Timber Forest Products in Kalash Valley Chitral. Pakistan Forest Department. Peshawar, Pakistan.
Brookfield, H.C., Potter, L. & Byron, Y. (1995). In Place of the Forest: Environmental and Social Transformation in Borneo and Eastern Malay Peninsula. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.
Curran, D., & M. M'Gonigle. (1999). Aboriginal Forestry: Community Management as Opportunity and Imperative. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 37(4): 711-774.
Dannenmann, B.M.E., Choocharoen, C., Spreer, W., Nagle, M., Leis, H., Neef, A. and Mueller, J. (2007). The potential of bamboo as a source of renewable energy in northern Laos. Conference on International Agricultural Research for Development, University of Kassel-Witzenhausen and University of Gottingen, October 9-11, 2007. Tropentag 2007.
Ibrahim, I. (2007). Warisan Motif dan Corak. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
Dransfield, J. & N. Manokaran eds. (1993). Plant resources of Southeast Asia - Rattans. PROSEA. Indonesia
Dolmer, P. (1997) .The Culture of Craft. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Forestry Department, FAO Corporate Document Repository. (2007). Rattan: current research issues. Prospects for conservation and sustainable.
FAO. FAO Forestry. (1992). Towards a harmonised definition of non-wood forest products. Unasylva – No. 198, Vol. 50.
Ir. Baharudin, MP & Ira Taskirawati. (2009). Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu. Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Hasanudin.
International Tropical Timber Organisation, (1997). Bamboo & Rattan: Resources for the 21st Century. Tropical Forest Update. Vol.7. No.4.
Johari B., Salleh M.N, (2007). Sustainable Utilisation of Non Timber Forest Products. Issues and Prospects. Institute for Development Studies, Sabah, Malaysia.
Kashio, M., Durst, P.B., Ulrich, W., eds. (1994). Non-wood forest products in Asia. RAPA Publication 1994/28. FAO-RAPA., Bangkok.
Kanel, K. R. & Dahal, G. R. (2008). Community Forestry Policy and Its Economic Implications: An Experience from Nepal.International Journal of Social Forestry, 2008, 1(1):50-60.
Kigomo, B. (2007). Guidelines for Growing Bamboo.Kenya Forestry Research Institute, KEFRI Pp 45.
Lacuna-Richman Celeste. (2007). Improving Commercial Possibilities of Non-wood
Forest Products from Leyte the Philippines. Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu, Finland
Marshall, E., Schreckenberg, K., Newton, A. (2003). Commercialization of non-timber forest products: First steps in analyzing the factors influencing success. Int Fores Rev, 2: 128-137
Maxim L., Shyam P., Junqi Wu, Marco P. (2005). Non-Wood Forest Products 18
World Bamboo Resources. Framework of the Global Forest Resources
Assessment 2005
Mirjam A.F. Ros-Tonen, K. Freerk Wiersum. (2003). The importance of non-timber forest products for forest-based rurallivelihoods: an evolving research agenda. Bonn, Germany
Murtedza, M. (1998). Sumber Alam. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka
Paglione, J.P.F. (2003). Sustainable biomass production utilizing bamboo. Alternative renewable non-wood resource.
Salkind, N. J. (1997). Exploring research (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Salam, K. (2008). Bamboo for economic prosperity and ecological security with special reference tonorth-east India, CBTC, Guwahati.
Scheer, S., White, A. and Kaimowitz, D. (2004). A new agenda for forest conservation and poverty reduction: Making markets work for low-income producers. Forest Trends, CIFOR, and IUCN. 160pp
Sunderland, T.C.H. & Nkefor, J.P. (2000). The propagation and cultivation of African rattans. Paper presented at the international workshop African Rattans: A Sta
In-Text Citation: (Rahim & Idrus, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Rahim, W. R. W. A., & Idrus, R. M. (2018). Importance and Uses of Forest Product Bamboo and Rattan: their Value to Socioeconomics of Local Communities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1484–1497.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode