Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Linking Dynamic Capability and Innovation Strategy to Social Enterprise Performance: A Conceptual Model

Erne Suzila Kassim, Thareq Ariffin Mohd Tajmi, Naffisah Mohd Hassan, Siti Uzairiah Mohd Tobi

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5286

Open access

In this paper, we offer a conceptual model for social enterprise (SE) performance that emphasizes on the roles of dynamic capabilities and innovation strategies. SE is vital as the third sector economy that addresses on the social, economic and environment agenda. Studying the phenomena of social entrepreneurship and explaining the social enterprises’ unique behaviors, characteristics, and typologies will advance research for creating sustainable public wealth. The model offers an opportunity for evaluation and validation through variety of research design and settings, and could be of interest to many. Ultimately, it could be used to quantify the contributions of social enterprises as the third sector economy.

Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Bengo, I. (2015). Performance measurement for social enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(2), 649-672.
Arogyaswamy, B. (2017). Social entrepreneurship performance measurement: A time-based organizing framework. Business Horizons, 60(5), 603-611.
Auvinet, C., & Lloret, A. (2011). Catalytic innovation as a strategy for social change and economical success. The case of Mexico. Cuadernos de Estudios Empresariales, 21, 115.
Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 149-165.
Bastida, R., Bastida, R., Marimon, F., Marimon, F., Tanganelli, D., & Tanganelli, D. (2017). Alliance success factors and performance in social economy enterprises. Management Decision, 55(5), 1065-1080.
?erne, M., Jakli?, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Decoupling management and technological innovations: Resolving the individualism–collectivism controversy. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 103-117.
Cho, S., & Kim, A. (2017). Relationships Between Entrepreneurship, Community Networking, and Economic and Social Performance in Social Enterprises: Evidence from South Korea. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 1-13.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi?dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of management studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.
Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes and antecedents. Management and organization review, 8(2), 423-454.
Defourny, J., Borzaga, C., & Defourny, J. (2001). From third sector to social enterprise (pp. 1-28). London: Routledge.
Defourny, J., Hulgård, L., & Pestoff, V. (Eds.). (2014). Social enterprise and the third sector: Changing European landscapes in a comparative perspective. Routledge.
El Ebrashi, R. (2013). Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact. Social Responsibility Journal, 9(2), 188-209.
Hausmann, R. C. (2015). Organizing Ecosystems for Social Innovation: The Relationality of Contexts and Mechanisms in a Social Entrepreneurship Network (Doctoral dissertation, The George Washington University).
Hsu, Y. (2011). Design innovation and marketing strategy in successful product competition. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(4), 223-236.
Jajja, M. S. S., Kannan, V. R., Brah, S. A., & Hassan, S. Z. (2017). Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance: insights from resource dependence theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(8), 1054-1075.
Kim, T. H., & Moon, M. J. (2017). Using Social Enterprises for Social Policy in South Korea: Do Funding and Management Affect Social and Economic Performance?. Public Administration and Development, 37(1), 15-27.
Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2015). An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 267-298.
Luke, B., Barraket, J., & Eversole, R. (2013). Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures: Performance evaluation of social enterprise. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3/4), 234-258.
Miles, M. P., Verreynne, M. L., Luke, B., Eversole, R., & Barraket, J. (2013). The relationship of entrepreneurial orientation, Vincentian values and economic and social performance in social enterprise. Review of Business, 33(2), 91.
Milligan, K. (2013). Breaking the Binary: Policy Guide to Scaling Social Innovation. Cologny: Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship.
Ngonini, X. (2014). Mapping out the role of social entrepreneurship and innovation in economic growth and job creation: A case of a state-owned entity in South Africa. In International Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance (p. 406). Academic Conferences Internationa

In-Text Citation: (Kassim, Tajmi, Hassan, & Tobi, 2018)
To Cite this Article: Kassim, E. S., Tajmi, T. A. M., Hassan, N. M., & Tobi, S. U. M. (2018). Linking Dynamic Capability and Innovation Strategy to Social Enterprise Performance: A Conceptual Model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12), 1663–1670.