ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Malay Language Literacy is the most important skills for all students to survive in the Malaysia educational systems. Reading comprehension is one of the skills that need to be gained by the students in the early age of school to ensure that they can perform well in the school. The aim of this study is to investigate the needs and the element that proposed by remedial education teachers for constructing reading comprehension learning modules named Scaffolding Literacy (ScafoLIT). This study was conducted using a survey design which involved 53 respondents among remedial education teachers in Daro District, Sarawak. The instrument used to collect research data was the Module Needs Analysis Questionnaire. Research finding shows that the participants agreed that there is a need to construct a reading comprehension learning module for remedial students with the mean value of M=3.71. This mean value shows that there is a high agreement among the participants about the need to construct a new learning module for remedial students. The three themes suggested by the participants to be included in the module are; Family with a mean value of M=4.15, Culture with a mean value of M=4.08 and Nature Conservation with a mean value of M=4.09. While the suggested learning activities to be included in the learning module is (i) read aloud (M=3.89), (ii) oral communication (M=3.96), (iii) coloring (M=3.91), (iv) match words with pictures (M=3.91), (v) match sentences with pictures (M=3.96). Finding of this study is clearly shown that there is a need to construct a reading comprehension learning module in order to help remedial students to overcome their difficulties in mastering the reading comprehension skills.
Amendum, S. J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E. (2017). Does Text Complexity Matter in the Elementary Grades?? A Research Synthesis of Text Difficulty and Elementary Students ’ Reading Fluency and Comprehension. Education Psychology, 30, 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9398-2
Bekiryazici, M. (2015). Teaching Mixed-Level Classes with a Vygotskian Perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 913–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.163
Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013). school struggling readers. Reading and Writing, 26, 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9406-3
Creswell, J. . (2010). Educational Research-planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth). New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.
Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument Review: Getting The Most From Your Panel of Expert. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197.
Dolezalova, J. (2015). Competencies of Teachers and Student Teachers for the Development of Reading Literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 519–525.
Jaeger, E. L. (2015). Learning to Construct Meaning From Text?: A Case Study of the Relationship Between a Tutor and an English Learner Within a Response to Intervention Setting Learning to Construct Meaning From Text?: A Case Study of the Relationship Between a Tutor and an E. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(4), 285–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2015.1062942
Knapp, N. F. (2016). Reading Together?: A Summer Family Reading Apprenticeship Program for Delayed and Novice Readers Reading Together?: A Summer Family Reading Apprenticeship Program for Delayed and Novice Readers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2015.1099767
Malaysia, M. of E. (2015). LINUS 2.0 Operating Guide. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Educational Research. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Scaffolding student participation in mathematical practices. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0730-3
Pfister, M., Moser Opitz, E., & Pauli, C. (2015). Scaffolding for mathematics teaching in inclusive primary classrooms: a video study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0713-4
Rasinski, T. (2016). Is What ’ s Hot in Reading What Should be Important for Reading Instruction?? Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(2), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1135391
Ronkova, J., & Wildova, R. (2016). Reading Strategies Activated in Experimental Research. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 363–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2015.1027020
Sidek H.M, & Abdul Rahim. (2015). The Role of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046
Sung, H. ., & Shu, F. . (2017). with specific poor comprehension?: a systematic review of treatment outcomes. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 917–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9697-x
Tropper, N., Leiss, D., & Hanze, M. (2015). Teachers’ temporary support and worked-out examples as elements of scaffolding in mathematical modeling. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1225–1240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0718-z
Wischgoll, A., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2015). Scaffolding—How can contingency lead to successful learning when dealing with errors? ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1147–1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0714-3
Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive Strategies as Points in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 593–600.
In-Text Citation: (Hasan & Ahmad, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Hasan, R., & Ahmad, N. A. (2019). Needs Analysis of Scaffolding Literacy (ScafoLIT) Module in Helping Remedial Students Mastering Reading Comprehension Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 284–295.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode