ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the leadership style of the head in department through the three types of leadership styles practiced which were transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership on the performance of administrative staff in one of the premier education universities in Malaysia. In addition, this study also sought to identify which leadership style of the head in department was a more dominant predictor on the performance of the administrative staff when the leadership styles (transformational, transactional and laissez-faire) were analyzed simultaneously. The quantitative approach was utilized in this study. The sample survey method was carried out involving 234 administrative staff as the respondents of the study. The sample was selected by using the simple random sampling technique and the data was collected using questionnaires. The data analysis was conducted using the Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) involving descriptive analysis (frequency and percentage). Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) version 7 software was used to perform multi-level analysis as the nature of the study data involved various levels of individual data nested (groups) in the organization. The analysis showed that transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership of the head in department was a positive significant with the in-role and extra-role performance of the administrative staff when analyzed separately. However, when the transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership of the head in department were analyzed simultaneously, they clearly showed that all these three leadership styles did not influence the in-role performance of the administrative staff. Interestingly in this study, only transformational leadership of the head of department proved a dominant influence on the extra-role performance of administrative staff compared to transactional and laissez-faire leadership. The findings of this study provided empirical evidence that although transformational, transactional and laissez-faire leadership of head of department could improve the in-role and extra-role performance of the administrative staff, this study proved that transformational leadership of the head of department could move to extra-role performance compared to other leadership styles.
Ahsan, N., Abdullah, Z., Fie, D.Y.G., & Alam, S. S. (2009). A study of job stress on job satisfaction among university staff in Malaysia?: Empirical study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 121–131.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2002). Transformational and charismatic leadership. The road ahead. Monographs in Leadership and Management. (Vol. 2). St. Louis. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3571(2013)0000005005
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. (2000). Technical report, leader form, rater form and scoring key for the MLQ f\Form 5X-short. Redwood City, CA.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. (1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire technical report. Redwood City, CA.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Burns J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: New York: Harper & Row.
Dumdum, U.R., Lowe, K.B., & Avolio, B. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead, 2(35–66).
Eagly, A.C., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
Egan, R., Sarros, J., & Santora, J. (1995). Putting transactional and transformational leadership into practice. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2(3), 100–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199500200309
Ejimabo, N. O. (2015). An approach to understanding leadership decision making in organisation. European Scientific Journal, 11(11), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00032a032
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
Goodman, S. A., & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person- organization fit and contextual performance?: Do shared values matter 1, 275, 254–275.
Gottfredson, R. K., & Aguinis, H. (2017). Leadership behaviors and follower performance: Deductive and inductive examination of theoretical rationales and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 558–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2152
Hirtz, P. D., Murray, S. L., & Riordan, C. A. (2007). The effects of leadership on quality. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 19(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2007.11431718
Kreft, I.G., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Sage.
Long, C.S., & Thean, L. Y. (2011). Relationship between leadership style, job satisfaction and employees’ turnover intention: A literature review. Research Journal of Business Management, 5, 91–100.
Koech P.M., & Namusonge, G.S. (2012). The effect of leadership styles on organizational performance at state corporations in Kenya. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2009.5414689
Maas, C. J., & Hox, J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
Mathieu, J.E., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 28(2), 141–172.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475
Northouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership, theory and practice (5 th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Obiwuru, T., Okwu, A., & Akpa, V. (2011). Effects of leadership style on organizational performance: A survey of selected small scale enterprises in Ikosi-Ketu council development area of Lagos
In-Text Citation: (Shokory, Hamid, Awang, & Hudin, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Shokory, S. M., Hamid, S. A., Awang, M., & Hudin, N. S. (2019). The Impact of the Leadership of the Head of Department on Administrative Staff’s Performance in Malaysian Premier Education University. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 27–42.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode