ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Background: Placement in institutions has once been the most popular rehabilitative measures for children beyond control in Malaysia. It has been enforced through the court’s order since British colonisation and continues until today. Throughout the historical development, children beyond control were sent to various institutional settings including the approved schools, probation hostels, place of refuge, privately-owned centres, and Henry Gurney Schools. However, this practice was criticised since it contradicts the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child’s principle which places institutionalisation as the last resort in the rehabilitation of children. Prior researches indicate that institutionalisation raises the issues of, inter-alia, stigma, deterioration of family relationship and interruption of academic development. Acknowledging the importance of family involvement in rehabilitating the children, the Child Act 2001 was amended recently with the objective, among others, to introduce family-based care. Therefore, this study is conducted to analyse the legal development of institutionalisation of children beyond control in Malaysia and the effect of the Child Act (Amendment) 2016 on institutionalisation of the children. This study is carried out through library research and semi-structured interviews with those involved directly in handling children beyond control cases including the officers of the Department of Social Welfare, probation officers and officers in charge of the probation hostels. The study found that despite of the heavy reliance made to the institutions for rehabilitation of children beyond control, institutionalisation has been reduced recently through the introduction of family-based care by the Child Act (Amendment) 2016.
Age Discrimination: Global Report on Status Offences. (2009). Retrieved 15 September 2017, from www.crin.org/en/library/publications/age-discrimination-global-report-status-offences-2nd-edition.
Ahmad, N. (2013). The Unheard Voices of Child Offenders: Time for Reform for the Youth Justice System in Malaysia? Presented at the 6th World Congress on Family Law and Children’s Right, Sydney, Australia on 17-20 Mac 2013. Retrieved 11 January 2014, from www. lawrights.asn.au/6th-world-congress/papers.html.
Akram, M. (2007). A Study on Some Recent Developments in the Rising Rate of Delinquent Behaviour in Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal, 7, xxxvii.
Cantwell, N. (1998). Juvenile Justice. Innocenti Digest, 3, 1–24. Retrieved 23 August 2016, from https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/digest3e.pdf
Champion, D. J. 2007. The Juvenile Justice System: Delinquency, Processing, and the Law. 5th ed.. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
Ellis, R. A., & Sowers, K. M. (2001). Juvenile Justice Practice: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach to Intervention. United States of America: Wadsworth Thomson Learning, Inc.
Haji Ali, A. (2006). Salah Laku Sosial Remaja Masa Kini: Cabaran dan Penyelesaiannya. In Institusi Keluarga: Menghadapi Cabaran Alaf Baru (pp. 89–115). Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications.
Hamzah, H., Mustafa, J., & Che Din, M. F. (2011). Masalah Sosial Remaja Masa Kini. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Sosial Malaysia.
Herring, J. (2011). Family Law. 5th ed. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Hussin, N. (2012). Juvenile Delinquency in Malaysia: Legal Framework and Prospects for Reforms. IIUM Law Journal, 15(2), 197–214.
Kim, J. J. (2010). Left Behind: The Paternalistic Treatment of Status Offenders Within the Juvenile Justice System. Washington University Law Review, 87, 843–867. Retrieved 7 November 2014, from http://www.lexisnexis.com/lnacui2api/api/version1/getDocCui?lni=505G-5NY0-00CW-303P&csi=27094 4,270077,11059,8411&hl=t& hv=t&hnsd=f&hns=t&hgn=t&oc=00240&perma=true.
Matthews, H. T. (2000). Status Offenders: Our Children’s Constitutional Rights Versus What’s Right For Them. Southern University Law Review, 27, 201–213. Retrieved 7 November 2014, from http://www.lexis nexis.com/lnacui2api/api/version1/getDocCui?lni=42D8-GV70-00CV-D0GC&csi=270944,270077,11059,8411&hl=t&hv=t&hnsd=f&hns=t& hgn=t&oc=00240&perma=true.
Nayagam, J. (2009). Strengths and Weakness of the Protection Mechanism and Support System for Reintegration of Children in Conflict with the Law [Human Rights and the Administration of Justice: A Report of SUHAKAM’s Conference held in Conjunction with the 8th Human Rights Day 9 September 2008], Retrieved 15 January 2014, from http://www.suhakam.org.my/c/document_library/get_file?p_1_id=22118_&_folderId =64628 & name=DLFE-5601.pdf.
Rashid, M. Z. (2009). Juvenile Justice in Malaysia: Role of the Department of Social Welfare [Human Rights and the Administration of Justice: A Report of SUHAKAM’s Conference held in Conjunction with the 8th Human Rights Day 9 September 2008]. Retrieved 15 January 2014, from http://www.suhakam.org.my/c/document_ library/get_file?p_1_id =22118_&_folder Id= 64628 & name=DLFE-5601.pdf.
Report of the Juvenile Delinquency and Juvenile Welfare Committee. (1947). (No. 18, M.U. 3484/47) (pp. c289–c300).
Sushama, P. C. (1992). The Caring Society: Institutional History and Prospects. In Caring Society: Emerging Issues and Future Directions (pp. 55–73). Malaysia: Institute of Strategic and International Studies.
Triantafillou, P., & Moreira, A. (2002). Rehearsing Citizenship: The Governing of Juvenile Delinquency in Colonial Malaya. Citizenship Studies, 6 (3), 325–340. Retrieved 9 November 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1080/1362102022000011649.
Villarante, A. J. (2005). A Comparative Study of Juvenile Justice Systems in Japan and Malaysia: A Review of Policies, Approaches and Strategies. In Economic Prospects, Cultural Encounters and Political Decisions: Reconstructing Scenes in a Moving Asia (East and So
In-Text Citation: (Nong & Yusoff, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Nong, S. N. A. S., & Yusoff, J. Z. M. (2019). Rehabilitation of Children Beyond Control in Malaysia: Towards Deinstitutionalization. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 449–459.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode