ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The purpose of this study is to examine economic growth and income and wealth distribution on the basis of Walrasian general equilibrium theory, neoclassical growth theory, and Dixit-Stiglitz monopolistic competitive theory. It makes a unique contribution to the literature of economic growth with perfect competition and monopolistic competition by integrating the basic economic mechanisms in the Walrasian general equilibrium model, the Solow one-sector growth model, and the Dixit-Stiglitz model. The final goods sector in our approach is based on Solow’s one-sector growth model. The issues of distribution are referred to the Arrow-Debreu theory. The market mechanism of perfect competitive markets is based on traditional neoclassical growth theory. We described imperfect competition on the approach basically developed by Dixit and Stiglitz. The paper unifies these approaches by applying the utility function and the concept of disposable income proposed by Zhang. We also deviate from the DixitStiglitz by assuming that non-zero profits are distributed to households. We build and then simulate the model for a three-group economy. We examine the effects of changes in some parameters on transitory processes and long-term equilibrium structure.
Arrow K.J. and Debreu, G. (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265–90. Arrow, K.J. and Hahn, F.H. (1971) General Competitive Analysis. San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc. Azariadis, C. (1993) Intertemporal Macroeconomics. Oxford: Blackwell. Barro, R.J. and X. Sala-i-Martin (1995) Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Becker, G.S. (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75(29), 493-517. Becker, G. S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Ben-David, D. and Loewy, M.B. (2003) Trade and neoclassical growth model. Journal of Economic Integration, 18(1), 1-16. Benassy, J.P. (1996) Taste for variety and optimum production patterns in monopolistic competition. Economics Letters, 52(1), 41-7. Bertoletti, P. and Etro, F. (2015) Monopolistic competition when income matters. The Economic Journal, 127(603), 1217-43. Burmeister, E. and Dobell, A.R. (1970) Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. Campbell, J.Y. and Ludvigson, S. (2001) Elasticities of substitution in real business cycle models with home production. Journal of Money, Credit and Bankings, 33(4), 847-875. Chang, W.W. (2012) Monopolistic competition and product diversity: Review and extension. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(5), 879-910. Dana, R.A, Florenzano, M., and Levy, D. (1989) Production prices and general equilibrium prices: A long-run property of a Leontief economy. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(3), 263–80. Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Equilibrium. Yale University Press, London. Diewert, W. (1977) Walras’ theory of capital formation and the existence of a temporary equilibrium. In: Schwödiauer, G. (Ed.) Equilibrium and Disequilibrium in Economic Theory. Dordrecht: Reidel. Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308. Edmonds, E.V. and Pavcnik, N. (2006) Trade liberalization and the allocation of labor between households and markets in a poor country. Journal of International Economics, 69(2), 272-95. Eatwell, J. (1987) Walras’ theory of capital, In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newmann, P. (Eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Political Economy. London: MacMillan. Ferber, M.A. and Green, C.A. (2007) Career of family: What choices do college women have? Journal of Labor Research, 24(1), 143-51. Gomme, P., Kydland, F.E., and Rupert, P. (2001) Home production meets time to build. The Journal of Political Economy, 109(5), 1115-31. Goodfriend, M. and McDermott, J. (1995) Early development. American Economic Review, 85(2), 116-33. Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1990) Comparative advantage and long-run growth. The American Economic Review, 80(4), 796-815. Gutierrez, M. (2003, eds.) Macro-Economics: Making Gender Matter. London: Zed Books. Impicciatore, G., Panaccione, L., and Ruscitti, F. (2012) Walras’s theory of capital formation: An intertemporal equilibrium reformation. Journal of Economic Theory, 106(2), 99-118. Jones, L. and Manuelli, R.E. (1997) The sources of growth. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(1), 75-114. Kelly, M. (1997) The dynamics of Smithian growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 939-64. Krugman, P.R. (1979) A model of innovation, technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 87(2), 253-66. Krugman, P.R. (1980) Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. The American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-59. Lancaster, K. (1980) Intra-industry trade under perfect monopolistic competition. Journal of International Economics, 10(2), 151-75. Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M.D. and Green, J.R. (1995) Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Montesano, A. (2008) A restatement of Walras’ theory of capitalization and money. History of Economics Review, 47(Winter), 86–109. Morishima, M.
In-Text Citation: (Zhang, 2019) To Cite this Article: Zhang, W.-B. (2019). A Simple Growth Model Based on Neoclassical Growth, Monopolistic Competition, and Walrasian General Equilibrium Theories. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 1005–1027.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode