Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Exploring Capacity of Midde Managers as Instructional Leadership to Lead Transformations of Teaching and Learning in Malaysian High Performing Schools

Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah, Abdul Jalil Ali, AlAmin Mydin , Nor Aiza Zamzam Amin

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i3/5773

Open access

Since 2013, the Malaysian Education Development Planning Plan 2013-2025 (PPPM) has been and is being implemented to drive the nation's education transformations. Therefore, recent studies suggest in making sure that effective instructional leadership is being practiced in schools, principals should share the instructional leadership functions with the school middle managers. Thus, the current study sought to expand on these earlier studies by examining the capacity of Malaysia’s middle managers as instructional leadership to lead transformations in teaching and learning. The study developed a national profile of middle managers instructional leadership from 400 high performing school teachers’ perspectives using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. The overall profile of location urban and region (North, Central, South, and East) middle managers suggested a moderate level of engagement in instructional leadership. However, there was a higher engagement revealed in instructional leadership by middle managers in rural schools especially in Central, South and East region of Peninsular Malaysia. The results provide evidence which suggests that a more systematic human resource strategy is needed in order to ensure that Malaysian principals should highly share and empower the duty as instructional leaders among the middle managers to support changes in teaching and learning.

Alimuddin, M. D. (2009), Instructional Leadership: Principal and teachers' role in enhancing quality of teaching and learning in classroom. Putrajaya: Kuala Lumpur.
Aniza, B., & Zaidatol, A. L. P. (2014).Principals' instruksional and transformational leadership practices and its relationship with school performance. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 28(02), 107-121.
Baharuzaini, B, Hisham,M. A., Hanif,M. Z., Norhisyam,M. K., & Norhaini,A.M. (2016). Headteachers' leadership style and teachers' efficacy. Journal of Personalized Learning, 2(1) 2016, 9-17.
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessman, L. (2007). The Role of Education Quality for Economic Growth, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4122
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. Boston: Prentice Hall.
Hallinger, P. (1990). Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Sarasota, FL: Leading Development Associates.
Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional Leadership and the School Principal: A Passing Fancy that Refuses to Fade Away. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behaviors of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1987). Assessing and Developing Principal Instructional Leadership. Educational Leadership Journal, 45(1), 54-61.
Harris, A. (2002). Distributed Leadership in Schools: Leading or misleading? Management in Education, 16(5), 10-13.
Hui,L.S., & Jamal, Y. (2016). Instructional leadership practices, organizational culture and organizational learning in Malaysian high performing schools. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 30(02), 1-19.
Ibrahim, K. A, Sani, M. I., & Rosemawati, M (2017). Instructional leadership competency among school principal: An empirical study in Selangor. Journal of Educational Leadership, 2(3),1-14
James, A. E., & Balasandran, R. (2009). Instructional leadership: A practical guide. Kuala Lumpur: PTS Professional.
Jamilah, A., & Boon. Y. (2011). Leadership practices in Malaysian high performing schools. Journal of Edupress, 1, 323-335.
Mahmood, H. (2008). Leadership and school effectiveness (2 Ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional Leadership: A Constructivist Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 430-443
Ministry of Education. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025: Preliminary Report - Executive summary.Putrajaya:Kuala Lumpur
Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In R. S. Lotto & P. W. Thurston (Eds.), Advances in educational administration: Changing perspective on the school (Vol. 1,Pt. B, pp. 163-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Premavathy, P. (2010). The relationship of instructional leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment and students’ achievement in small schools. Master’s Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Solomon, C. B. (2007). The relationships among middle level leadership, teacher commitment, teacher collective efficacy, and student achievement. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Missouri - Columbia.
Kean, H.T., Sathiamoorthy, K, & Chua, Y. P. (2017), the Effect of School Bureaucracy on the Relationship between Principals’ Leadership Practices and Teacher Commitment in Malaysia Secondary Schools. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5 (1): 37-55.
Shafinaz, A. M., Chua, Y. P, Wei,L.M., & Alias,S. (2016). Principals' instructional leadership and its relationship with teachers self eficacy. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 30(02), 73-92.
Sim,Q, C. (2011). Insructional leadership among principals of secondary schools in Malaysia. International Research Journal. 2, 1784-1800.
Weber, J. (1996). Leading the instructional program. In S. Smith & P. Piele (Eds.), School leadership (pp. 253-278). Eugene, OR: Clearinghouse of Educational Management.
Yusri,M. I & Amin,A.

In-Text Citation: (Abdullah, Ali, Mydin, & Amin, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Abdullah, A. G. K., Ali, A. J., Mydin, A., & Amin, N. A. Z. (2019). Exploring Capacity of Midde Managers as Instructional Leadership to Lead Transformations of Teaching and Learning in Malaysian High Performing Schools. International Journal Academic Research Business and Social Sciences, 9(3), 1132–1142.