Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-6348

Cultivating Blended Learning in Teaching and Learning: Teachers’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Readiness in Malaysia

Noraini Mohamed Noh, Norazilawati Abdullah, Wong Kung Teck, Mahizer Hamzah

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i2/5778

Open access

This study aims to ascertain teachers’ intrinsic and extrinsic factors and their relationship towards the blended learning approach in teaching and facilitating. The study was conducted on 200 primary school teachers who were teaching in a few schools in Selangor and Perak and the sample was selected randomly. The questionnaire contained 11 constructs and self-reporting items were chosen to obtain the data. The findings indicated that there was a moderate positive relationship for intrinsic teacher factors such as individual innovation, information technology specific innovation, computer self-efficacy, ICT knowledge and skills with blended learning practice. There was also a moderate positive relationship for extrinsic teacher factors such as administrators’ support, role of change agents, school and training facilities with blended learning approach in teachers’ teaching and learning. As such, to ensure the success of the implementation of the blended learning approach as well as to increase its practice, the administrators should work to increase the teachers’ academic awareness via promotions, preparing physical and technical facilities, providing support and practice continuously, creating an online learning culture and giving initiative and acknowledgement for teachers who are intent on making blended learning a success.

Almasaeid, T. F. (2014). The effect of using blended learning strategy on achievement and 9th grade students. European Scientific Journal, 10(31), 133–145. From http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/4573/4370
Bachman, C., & Scherer, R. (2015). Promoting student autonomy and competence using a hybrid model for teaching physical activity. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1). From http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2015_1_1.pdf
Bingimalas, K. A. 2009. Barriers to successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & technology Education 5(3): 235-245
Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M. D., Butler, M., & Cho, S.-J. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437. http://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527240
Briggs, K. C. (2014). Blended learning vs face-to-face instruction: a quantitative evaluation of student achievement in algebra I. Northcentral University.
Chang, C. C., Shu, K. M., Liang, C., Tseng, J. S., & Hsu, Y. S. (2014). Is blended e-learning as measured by an achievement test and self-assessment better than traditional classroom learning for vocational high school students? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 213–231.
Gong, M., Xu, Y & Yu, Y.H. 2004. An Enhanced technology acceptance model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education 15(4): 365-347
Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners’ attitude on smart school initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 728–737. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099
Hamzah, M. I., Embi, M. A., & Ismail, A. (2010). ICT and diversity in learners’ attitude on smart school initiative. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 728–737. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.099
Hu, P. J., Clark, T. H. K. & Ma, W. W. 2003. Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: a longitudinal study. Information & Management 41(2): 227-241
Huang, R., Ma, D., & Zhang, H. (2008). Towards a design theory of blended learning curriculum. In J. Fong, R. Kwan, & F. L. Wang (Ed.), Hybrid Learning and Education (hal. 66–78). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85170-7
Hunt, L., Eagle, L. & Kitchen, P.J. 2004. Balancing marketing education and information technology: matching needs or needing a better match. Journal of Marketing Education 26(1): 75-88
Isiguzel, B. (2014). The blended learning environment on the foreign language learning process: a balance for motivation and achievement. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15(3(10)), 108–122.
Jackson, S.L. 2006. Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. Edisi ke-2. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth
Korkmaz, O., & Karakus, U. (2009). The impact of blended learning model on student attitudes towards geography course and their critical thinking dispositions and levels. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(4), 51–63. From dari http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ859497.pdf
Lee, L. T., & Hung, J. C. (2015). Effects of blended e-learning: a case study in higher education tax learning setting. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5(1), 13. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-015-0024-3
Martin, J. S., Kreiger, J. E., & Apicerno, A. L. (2015). Effectiveness of a hybrid classroom in the delivery of medical terminology course content relative to a traditional classroom format. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(5), 72–81. http://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13994
Magdy, S. A. (2016), Measuring Attitudes toward Blended Learning Environment among Undergraduate Students in Palestine, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development 2016, Vol. 5, No. 4 ISSN: 2226-6348. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v5-i4/2454
Mc

In-Text Citation: (Noh, Abdullah, Teck, & Hamzah, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Noh, N. M., Abdullah, N., Teck, W. K., & Hamzah, M. (2019). Cultivating Blended Learning in Teaching and Learning: Teachers’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Readiness in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 257–265.