ISSN: 2225-8329
Open access
This research is aimed to examine (1) effect of managerial ownership on informative earnings management, (2) effect of institutional ownership on informative earnings management, (3) effect of foreign ownership on informative earnings management. Research sample are 123 manufacture companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange 2013-2017. Ownership measured by proportion of company’s share held by management, institution, and foreign shareholders. Informative earnings management is dummy variable which measured by comparing discretionary accruals and earnings growth. Data analysis uses logistic regression test. Results show that managerial ownership has no effect on informative earnings management, indicates that there is still agency conflict between owner-manager as minority shareholders with majority shareholders. Institutional and foreign ownership has effect on informative earnings management, indicates that institution and foreign shareholders have effective monitoring to reduce opportunist earnings management and increase informative earnings management. As expected, shareholders will reduce opportunist earnings management and increase informative earnings management, because informative earnings management reduces information asymmetric and increases share value.
1. Abdolkhani, H., & Jalali, R. (2013). Effect of Managerial Ownership Concentrated on Firm Return and Value: Evidence from Iran Stock Market. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Sciences, 3(1), 46–51.
2. Ahmed, H., & Azim, M. (2015). Earnings Management Behavior: A Study on the Cement Industry of Bangladesh. International Journal of Management, Accounting and Economics, 2(4), 265–276.
3. Aryanti, I., Kristanti, F. T., & Hendratno. (2017). Kepemilikan Institusional, Kepemilikan Manajerial, dan Kualitas Audit terhadap Manajemen Laba. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Kontemporer, 9(2), 66–70.
4. Cohen, D. A., Darrough, M. N., Huang, R., & Zach, T. (2011). Warranty Reserve: Contingent Liability, Information Signal, or Earnings Management Tool? The Accounting Review, 86(2), 569–604. doi:10.2308/accr.00000021
5. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management2, 3(1), 39–67.
6. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.
7. DeFond, M. L. (1992). The Association Between Changes in Client Firm Agency Costs and Auditor Switching. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11(1), 16–31.
8. Gabrielsen, G., Gramlich, J. D., & Plenborg, T. (2002). Managerial Ownership, Information Content of Earnings, and Discretionary Accruals in a Non-US Setting. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(7-8), 967–988.
9. Gugong, B. K., Arugu, L. O., & Dandago, K. I. (2014). The Impact of Ownership Structure on the Financial Performance of Listed Insurance Firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Sciences, 4(1), 409–416.
10. Gunny, K. A. (2010). The Relation between Earnings Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Performance: Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 855–888. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01029.x
11. Guo, J., Huang, P., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, N. (2015). Foreign Ownership and Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Accounting Research, 14(2), 185–213.
12. Irani, R. M., & Oesch, D. (2016). Analyst Coverage and Real Earnings Management: Quasi-Experimental Evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51(02), 589–627. doi:10.1017/S0022109016000156
13. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
14. Jiang, L., & Kim, J. B. (2004). Foreign Equity Ownership and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 15(3), 185–211.
15. Jusoh, M. A. (2016). Equity Ownership and Firm Performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Sciences, 6(11), 423–435.
16. Kiamehr, M., Moghaddam, A. A., Alipour, S., & Hajeb, H. R. (2015). Examining the Impact of Institutional Ownership on Monitoring Cost: The Case of Iranian Firms Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Sciences, 5(4), 22–30.
17. Kirmani, A., & Rao, A. R. (2000). No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 66–79.
18. Klapper, L., Laevan, L., & Love, I. (2006). Corporate Governance Provisions and Firm Ownership: Firm-level Evidence from Eastern Europe. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 429–444.
19. Koh, P. S. (2003). On the Association between Institutional Ownership and Aggresive Corporate Earnings Management in Australia. The British Accounting Review, 35(2), 105–128.
20. Kothari, S. P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2016). Managing for the Moment: The Role of Earnings Management via Real Activities versus Accruals in S
To cite this article: Putra, A. A., Mela, N. F. (2019). Effect of Ownership Types on Informative Earnings Management, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 9 (2): 74-82.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode