ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Nowadays, oil and gas companies are competing each other because whichever company that able to provide immediate response and mobilized faster, they will be the winner. Lack of sensitivity in managing and monitoring processing time for certain process or procedures are bad for continuous business growth. This problem occurs because of poor management structure that applied by the organization especially for a company having parent-subsidiaries company. Thus, this paper is to highlight the importance of management structure for organization. Eventually, this paper compares the most suitable structure between centralized and matrix structure management approach in order to implement in Malaysia’s expanding oil and Gas Company. Based on the literature review had been reviewed, theories that explained about managing in an organization is contingency theory which can define "the best way of organizing depends on the environment the organization operates in" (Scott, 2004). On the other hand system theory explained on the “of abstract social communication systems conceptualizes social structures and organizations as systems of inter-human communications.” (Ott and Shafritz, 1996). According to (Kuprenas, 2003a) system theory is a traditional hierarchy overlaid by some form of lateral authority, influence, or communication. Conversely, centralize management is the organizational structure that provides authority to the company (Maleki, 2014) and matrix management is designed based on the functional and project organization (Larson and Gobeli, 1987). By assuming operation of organization depending to communication within the internal and external parties in the organization, thus time response which took for communication would be the benchmark in proposing the suitable management structure. This paper focus to investigate the behavior of centralized and matrix structure management which has been implemented in oil and gas companies in Malaysia with condition it is a ‘mother – daughter’ company. Furthermore, this study to give the best picture especially mother company organization to determine the best organization structure to be implement. The right selection will drive organization to improve and increase the level of communication, operation and business opportunities between internal and external parties of organization. This may help to improve the business operation between internal and external parties within the organization which always faced problem and difficulties in communication among staff, vendor and client.
Andrew, H. (1986). Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science , 32 (5).
Bhargava, S., & Kelkar, A. (2011). Examining the relationship between organizational structure, job involvement, job satisfaction, and empowerment: Implications for human resource development. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, , 150-161.
Bon, A. T. (2013). Impact of Total Quality Management on Innovation in Service Organizations: Literature review and New Conceptual Framework. Procedia Engineering , 516-529.
Brown, S., & Lamming, R. (2005). Innovations- Managing the Renewal Business. Strategic Operations Management , 140-184.
Davis, S., & Lawrence, P. (1978, May). HBR.org. Retrieved from Harvard Business Revie: https://hbr.org/1978/05/problems-of-matrix-organizations
EYGM. (2014). Centralized Operations; The Future of Operating Models for Risk, Control and Compliance Functions. UK: Earnst & Young Global Limited.
Feforciow, L. (2014). Strategies for the Management and Adoption of Impact Capture Processes within Research Information Management Systems. Procedia Computer Science , 25-32.
Feizi, M. (2008). An Analyzing Survey on the Relationship between Organizational Structure & Organizational Creativity Case Studies: Shiraz Middle School Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Creation Recognition & Engineering of Innovation Management in Iran Tehran. Science Research Institute Creativity and Innovation.
Haselwander, N. (2014). Survey of Nurse Leaders; Current and future management of contingent workforce operations. US: Shift Wise.
Hedlund, G. (1984). Organization in-between: The evolution of the mother-daughter structure of managing foreign subsidiaries in Swedish MNCs. Journal of International Business Studies , 109-123.
Jani?ijevi?, N., & Aleksi?, A. (2007). Complexity of Matrix Organization and Problems Caused by its Inadequate Implementation. Ekonomski anali , 52 (174-175), 28-44.
Kencana Petroleum Berhad. (2011). Annual Report 2011. KPB.
Kuprenas, J. A. (2003). Implementation and Performance of a Matrix Organization Structure. Internation Journal of Project Management , 21, 51-62.
Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1987). Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights. California Management Review , 29 (4), 126-138.
Mahmood, M. (2010). Strategy, Structure And HRM Practices In Multinational Subsidiaries: European Mncs In A Developing Country Context. 1-20.
Maleki, A. (2014). The Relationship Between Perception of Oranization Structure and Human Resource Development. International Journal of Asian Social Science , 585-597.
Mansueto, J. (2013). Morning Star Annual Report 2013.
Montana, P., & Charnov, B. (1993). Organizational Structures: Concepts and Formats. Business Review Series , 155-169.
O, G., & H, L. (2015). Service risk perception and risk management strategies in business to business tourism partnerships. Tourism Management Perspectives , 7-17.
Pilenko, T. (2012). Reference Document Including the Annual Financial Report. Grande Armee: Technip.
Simoes, V. C. (2006). Subsidiary Decision Making Autonomy: Competences, Integration And Local. 1-28.
Steensen, F. E. (2014). Five types of Organizational Strategy. Journal of Mnagement , 266-281.
Taggart, J., & Neil, H. (1999). Determinants of Autonomy in Multinational Corporation Subsidiaries. European Management Journal , 226-236.
Tohidi, H. (2011). The Role of Risk Management in IT Systems of Organizations. Procedia Computer Science , 881-887.
Wilhelm, T. (2013). Pentest Project Management. In P. P. Testing. Elsevier.
Wright, C. M., & Mechling, G. (2002). The Importance of Operations Management Problems. Omega , 77-87.
In-Text Citation: (Johari, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Johari, M. J. B. M. (2019). Are you Receiving Complaints Regarding Processing Time Response? The Suitable Management Structure for Expanding Oil and Gas Contractor in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(7), 670–685.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode