Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Does Program fees Affect the Relationship between Lecturers’ Competencies and Student’ Satisfaction in the Digital Era? A Case of Malaysia Higher Education

Muhammad Safuan Abdul Latip, Rachel Yong Yuen May, Mohamad Arif Abdul Kadir, Tan Chee Kwan

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i7/6187

Open access

The research model investigated the effect of lecturers’ competencies on students’ satisfaction and programme fees through a formative analysis. Notably, the research model included four keys of lecturers’ competencies dimensions which are knowledge and credential (Knowledge), pedagogy knowledge and skill (Pedagogy), industrial experience and motivation. The analysis is based on a sample of 386 active students of bachelor’s degree onward from eight different Malaysia public and private higher education institutions. The data was collected through a questionnaire survey and analysed using AMOS Software, SPSS and PROCESS by Andrew F. Hayes. The main findings suggested that only knowledge, industrial experience and motivation have positive effects on students’ satisfaction. However, the multi-group analysis showed that only industrial experience and motivation are a significant variable for a private institution. Nonetheless, there is no direct significant relationship between lecturers’ competencies variables on programme fees. Somehow, programme fees proved to have a significant effect on student satisfaction. Yet surprisingly, the programme fees do not have a mediating effect between lecturers’ competencies and students’ satisfaction compared to a normal commercial transaction.

Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). The effects of service quality on student loyalty: the mediating role of student satisfaction. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-04-2014-0031
Arambewela, R., & Hall, J. (2009). An empirical model of international student satisfaction. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(4), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850910997599
Ary, D., Razavieh, A., & Jacobs, L. C. (1996). Introduction to research in education. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace College Publication.
Awang, M. G. (2014). Pedagogy for lecturers. Pahang, Malaysia: Universiti Malaysia Pahang.
Awang, Z., Hui, L. S., & Zainudin, N. F. S. (2018). Pendekatan Mudah SEM Structural Equation Modelling. Selanhor: MPWS Rich Resources Sdn. Bhd.
Azman, N., Idris, M. F. M., & Siang, H. Y. (2014). Dialog meja bulat naib canselor memacu universiti di Malaysia ke arah kecemerlangan. Terengganu, Malaysia: Universiti Malaysia Terengganu.
Benjamin, S. J., Marathamuthu, M. S., Muthaiyah, S., & Raman, M. (2011). Affordability of private tertiary education: A Malaysian study. International Journal of Social Economics, 38(4), 382–406
https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291111112068
Briggs, A. R., Coleman, M., & Morrison, M. (2012). Research methods in educational leadership and management. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS?: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Multivariate Applications Book Series.
Carter, S., & Yeo, A. C. M. (2016). Students-as-customers’ satisfaction, predictive retention with marketing implications: The case of Malaysian higher education business students. International Journal of Educational Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-09-2014-0129
Deaconu, A., Osoian, C., Zaharie, M., & Achim, S. A. (2014). Competencies in higher education system: An empirical analysis of employers’ perceptions. Amfiteatru Economic, 16(37), 857–873.
Douglas, J., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 251–267.
https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610678568
Dwenger, N., Storck, J., & Wrohlich, K. (2012). Do tuition fees affect the mobility of university applicants? Evidence from a natural experiment. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 155–167.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.10.004
Gruber, T., Fub, S., Voss, R., & Gläser?Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551011022474
Hanapi, Z., & Nordin, M. S. (2014). Unemployment among Malaysia Graduates: Graduates’Attributes, Lecturers’ Competency and Quality of Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1269
Hassan, S. A., & Ghazali, R. (2012). Quick tips fast track conducting quantitative research. Bangi, Selangor: Quty Researcher.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation and Conditional Process Analysis. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
Jones, G. (2010). Managing student expectations the impact of top-up tuition fees. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(2), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603101003776135
Kashif, M., & Ting, H. (2014). Service-orientation and teaching quality: business degree students’ expectations of effective teaching. Asian Education and Development Studies, 3(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2013-0038
Khoo, S., Ha, H., & McGregor, S. L. T. (2017). Service quality and student/customer satisfaction in the private tertiary educatio

In-Text Citation: (Latip, May, Kadir, & Kwan, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Latip, M. S. A., May, R. Y. Y., Kadir, M. A. A., & Kwan, T. C. (2019). Does Program fees Affect the Relationship between Lecturers’ Competencies and Student’ Satisfaction in the Digital Era? A Case of Malaysia Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(7), 877–900.