ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Psychomotor domain involves physical movement, coordination and applied motor-skill areas, where substantial practices are needed in order to develop these skills overtime. Assessment of psychomotor domain can be carried out in aspects of speed, precision, distance, procedures. The attainment for program outcomes under psychomotor domain can be measured by using direct and explicit assessment. Majority of the lecturers lack the necessary practical experience to relate with fundamentals in order to practice and to give examples resulted in the students not being able to relate theory with practice and apply their knowledge to solve practical problems. This paper identifies the important attributes of students in attaining psychomotor skills in laboratory courses using a program outcome (PO) related to investigation aspects. Majority of the respondents indicated that they have acquired the necessary skills under psychomotor domain related to problem identification, procedure determination, apparatus usage, data collection, results interpretation and proposition of viable solutions. Direct attainment shows that the students passed the PO designed for the laboratory courses. Using relative important index (RII), important factors influencing students’ attainment on psychomotor skills are the condition of equipment in the laboratories, lecturers’ clear instructions before the student conduct experiment and the conducive environment to conduct experiment. A conducive environment with adequate equipment and supported by lecturers to carry out effective investigation give opportunity to the students to acquire and improve their psychomotor skills. This study is important to understand psychomotor elements attained by the students and how assessment is carried out effectively.
Atiq, R., & Rahmat, A. O. K. (2011). Achievement of Program Outcomes Using Assessment Plan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.013
Baharom, S., Khoiry, M. A., Hamid, R., Mutalib, A. A., & Hamzah, N. (2015). Assessment of psychomotor domain in a problem-based concrete labrotary. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 10(Spec. Issue 1 on UKM Teaching and Learning Congress 2013, June 2015), 1–10.
Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Ferris, T., & Aziz, S. (2005). A psychomotor skills extension to Bloom’s taxonomy of education objectives for engineering education. Exploring Innovation in Education and Research, (March), 1–5. Retrieved from http://slo.sbcc.edu/wp-content/uploads/bloom-psychomotor.pdf
Haron, Z., Mohammad, S., Sam, A. R., MushairryMustaffar, & JamaludinMohdYatim. (2013). The Implementation of an Open-ended Experiment in the Civil Engineering Laboratory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 548–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.771
International Engineering Alliance. “Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies.” , (2013).
Johari, M., Mohd, M., Universiti, N., Abdullah, A., Ali, A., Putra, U., … Mohd, M. (2005). A Malaysian outcome-based engineering education model. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2(1), 14–21.
Kasilingam, G., Ramalingam, M., & Chinnavan, E. (2014). Assessment of learning domains to improve student’s learning in higher education. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 6(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2014.1.5
Markle, R., & O’Banion, T. (2014). Assessing Affective Factors to Improve Retention and Completion. Learning Abstracts, 17(11), 1–16.
Mishra, R., Barrans, S., & Crinela, P. (2009). Imparting psychomotor skills to the learners using computer aided instructions in Engineering Education. Research, Reflections and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education Imparting, (4), 387–391.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). “Psychometric Theory.” McGraw-Hill.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual.
Rao, P. O. R. S. (2013). Outcome Based Engineering Education - Need of the Hour. The Journal of Engineering Education, (July).
Rao, P. O. R. S. (2015). Outcomes based Engineering Education - Need of the hour. The Journal of Engineering, (July 2013), 1–13.
Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
Sajjad, S. (2011). Effective Teaching Methods at Higher Education Level. Department of Special Education University of Karachi, 1–16. Retrieved from http://class.web.nthu.edu.tw/ezfiles/669/1669/img/1381/1.Effectiveteachingmethodsathighereducationlevel.pdf
White, C., Rodger, M. W., & Tang, T. (2016). Current understanding of learning psychomotor skills and the impact on teaching laparoscopic surgical skills. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 18(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12255
Zainudin, S., Ahmad, K., Ali, N. M., & Zainal, N. F. A. (2012). Determining Course Outcomes Achievement Through Examination Difficulty Index Measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.275
In-Text Citation: (Isa et al., 2019)
To Cite this Article: Isa, C. M. M., Joseph, E. O., Saman, H. M., Jan, J., Tahir, W., & Mukri, M. (2019). Attainment of Program Outcomes under Psychomotor Domain for Civil Engineering Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 107–122.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode