ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Although there has been a substantial increase in the number of research students enrolled in public higher learning institutions in Malaysia, the high attrition rate amongst doctoral students is quite alarming. Various research efforts have been carried out to investigate this phenomenon; however, most of the studies were focused solely on supervision. Even less is known about the challenges that research students in Malaysia face during their doctoral learning journey and how they cope with these challenges. This study examined the learning challenges that research students experienced during their doctoral learning journey and how they managed to overcome the challenges. This qualitative study involved an extensive collection of time- and context-sensitive data and emphasized on giving participants a personal voice. Snowball sampling was used and a total of eight participants were involved in this study. Four stages of data collection generated rich data from lengthy interviews and provided opportunities for re-interviewing the same participants all over again. Three types of interviews were utilised, and necessary steps were taken to ensure trustworthiness was established in this research. Based on the research findings, three broad categories of learning challenges were identified namely supervision, academic and psychological. Academic challenges were most profound in their learning in which knowledge creation and conceptualization being the most challenging skills whilst psychological issues were the least challenging. This study introduced a fresh perspective to the literature on research students, which has been dominated by investigation into the supervision process.
Batchelor, D. & Napoli, D. R. (2006). The doctoral journey: Perspectives. Educate, 6(1), 13-24.
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J. & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semi-structured interviews: Problems of unitization and inter-coder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(3), 294-320.
Entwistle, N. (2004). Teaching-learning environment to support deep learning in contrasting subject areas, Paper presented at Staffordshire University, 29 June, Stafford.
Haksever, A. M., & Manisali, E. (2000). Assessing supervision requirements of PhD students: The case of construction management and engineering in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 19-32.
Kiley, M. & Wisker, G. (2009) Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(4), 431-441.
Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Lovitts, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). The hidden crisis in graduate education: Attrition from Ph.D. programs. Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 86(6), 44-50.
Martin, R., Cohen, J. W. & Champion, D. R. (2013). Conceptualization, operationalization, construct validity, and truth in advertising in criminological research. Journal of Theoretical & Philosophical Criminology, 5(1), 1-38.
Martin, Y. M., Maclachlan, M., & Karmel, T. (2001). Postgraduate completion rates. Canberra: Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
McKenna, H. (2006). Nursing theories and models. Routledge.
Merriam, S. B. & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Ministry of Education Malaysia, (2015). Quick facts 2015. Educational Planning and Research Division, Malaysia Educational Statistics.
Morgan, W., & Ryan, M. (2003). Rendering an account: An open-state archive in postgraduate supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 22(1), 77-90.
Park, C. (2007). Redefining the Doctorate. York: The Higher Education Academy.
Perera, S. (2005). Plunge into the Deep End. In T. Vilkinas (Ed), The Thesis Journey: Tales of personal triumph, (pp. 27-30). Frenchs Forest: Pearson.
Thorne, L. E. (1999). Perspectives on the purposes, processes and products of doctorates: Towards a rich picture of doctorates. (Doctoral dissertation, Middlesex University).
Trafford, V. & Leshem, S. (2009). Doctorateness as a threshold concept. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Special issue: Embracing Contraries in Research on Doctoral Education, 46(3), 305-316.
Vilkinas, T. (2005). The supervisor role as a manager of the Ph.D. journey. In P. Green (Ed.), Supervising postgraduate research: Contests and processes, theories and practices (pp. 163-177). Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press
Zuram, D. (2005). PhDs: What they don’t tell you. Retreived from www.FindAPhD.com
In-Text Citation: (Ismail, Majid, & Ismail, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Ismail, H. M., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2019). A Rollercoaster Ride of Emotions: Investigating Learning Challenges in a Doctoral Learning Journey. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(13), 262–269.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode