ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
This paper discusses the benchmarking, flexible and innovation process as continuous improvement business processes that drive organizational performance of logistics service providers in the military system. From dynamic capability theory perspectives, the organizational dynamic capability of each military logistics service providers may impact the military as the end users. With emphasize on the proposed business processes towards logistics performance, knowledge absorptive capacity is an additional factor that moderates the relationship between continuous improvement and logistics performance. This paper would give insights through proposed research framework using dynamic capability theory as theoretical stance as well as providing logistics service providers with business framework that impacted on logistics performance with knowledge absorptive capacity as enhancers to the military logistics operation in the military.
Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2010). Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long range planning, 43(1), 104-122.
Barad, M., & Sapir, D. E. (2003). Flexibility in logistic systems—modeling and performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 155-170.
Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372-387.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2001). Supply chain management: strategy. Planning and Operation, 15(5), 71-85.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
Davids, C., Beeres, R., & van Fenema, P. C. (2013). Operational defense sourcing: organizing military logistics in Afghanistan. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(2), 116-133.
Ding, M. J., Kam, B. H., & Lalwani, C. S. (2012). Operational routines and supply chain competencies of Chinese logistics service providers. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 383-407.
Do, M. B., & Kambhampati, S. (2002, April). Planning Graph-based Heuristics for Cost-sensitive Temporal Planning. In AIPS (pp. 3-12).
Dosi, G. (1997). Opportunities, incentives and the collective patterns of technological change. The economic journal, 107(444), 1530-1547.
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116.
Flatten, T. C., Greve, G. I., & Brettel, M. (2011). Absorptive capacity and firm performance in SMEs: The mediating influence of strategic alliances. European Management Review, 8(3), 137-152.
García-Morales, V. J., Lloréns-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2007). Influence of personal mastery on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation in large firms and SMEs. Technovation, 27(9), 547-568.
Glas, A., Hofmann, E., & Eßig, M. (2013). Performance-based logistics: a portfolio for contracting military supply. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(2), 97-115.
Gutiérrez, L. G., Bustinza, O. F., & Molina, V. B. (2012). Six sigma, absorptive capacity and organizational learning orientation. International Journal of Production Research, 50(3), 661-675.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization science, 2(1), 88-115.
Humphreys, P., McAdam, R., & Leckey, J. (2005). Longitudinal evaluation of innovation implementation in SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 283-304.
Hyland, P. W., Soosay, C., & Sloan, T. R. (2003). Continuous improvement and learning in the supply chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(4), 316-335.
Jansen, J. J., Tempelaar, M. P., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20(4), 797-811.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137-159.
Jin, Y., & Edmunds, P. (2015). Achieving a competitive supply chain network for a manufacturer: a resource-based approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(5), 744-762.
Julien, P. A., & Ramangalahy, C. (2003). Competitive strategy and performance of exporting SMEs: An empirical investigation of the impact of their export information search and competencies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(3), 227-245.
Kamasak, R., Yavuz, M.,
In-Text Citation: (Loy, Rahman, Rashid, & Hamid, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Loy, C. K., Rahman, A. R. A., Rashid, S. A., & Hamid, N. R. A. (2019). A Framework for Continuous Improvement Process Capability and Knowledge Absorptive Capacity towards Military Logistics Performance: A Dynamic Capability Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(7), 1321-1336.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode