Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2226-3624

Optimal Government Debt and Economic Performance in Nigeria

Fasoranti Modupe Mary, Koledoye Emmanuel Sunday, Adamu Taiwo Haruna

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJAREMS/v8-i3/6626

Open access

Developing economies rely on government debts in financing its budget deficit. Nevertheless, debt incurred beyond a limit becomes detrimental to the economy. This study examined the optimal point beyond which government debt impairs economic performance in Nigeria. Data from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Statistical Bulletin from 1986 to 2017 were employed for the study. Dynamic Ordinary Least Square (DOLS) was used to estimate the magnitude of the coefficients. The unit root test showed that the variables of the study were stationary at a 5% significant level and the co-integration test confirmed a long-run relationship between the variables. The estimation showed a significant relationship between government debt and Nigeria’s economic performance. Government debt is growth-enhancing at low levels but growth-retarding at a high level with the optimal government debt estimated as 9.98% of the gross domestic product (GDP). This implies that borrowing beyond such a limit becomes growth-retarding in the economy. The study concluded that an increase in government debt elevates Nigeria’s economic performance. However, it becomes detrimental to the economy when surpasses the threshold level estimated in this study. Therefore, the study recommends that the government should focus on other sources of revenue to fund its budget deficits to decrease the debt burden. Also, the debt management office (DMO) of the federal government should introduce debt forgiveness measures that may encourage lending nations or entities to relax debt conditions, thereby reducing the debt profile of the country.

Abbas, A. & Christensen, E. (2007). The role of domestic debt markets in economic growth: an empirical investigation for low-income countries and emerging markets. IMF Working Paper WP/07/127.
Achan, C. H. (2001). Why lagged dependent variable can suppress the explanatory power of the other independent variables”. Annual meeting of the political methodology of the American political science association. Institute of Social Research Michigan. 1-25.
Alimi, R. S. (2014). Does optimal government size exist for developing economies? the case of Nigeria, MPRA Paper 56073, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Amaeteng, A & Amoako, A. (2002). Unidirectional and positive causal relationship between foreign debt service and GDP growth: Annual Report and Statement of account.
Barro, R. J. (1999). Notes on optimal management, Journal of Applied Economics, 2(2): 281-289
Boboye, L. & Ojo, M. (2012). Effect of external debt on economic growth and development of Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(12).
Caner, M., Grennes, T., and Koehler-Geib, F., 2010, Finding the tipping point – when sovereign debt turns bad, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5391.
Chen, C. & Lin Y. (2017), Optimal Government Investment and Public Debt in an Economic Growth Model. China Economic Review, 45:257-278.
Chudik, A., K., Mohaddes, M. H. Pesaran, & Raissi, M. (2015). Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute Working Paper No. 223.
Debt Management Office. (2017). Annual Report and Statement of Accounts.
Eboreime, I. M., & Sunday, B. (2017). Analysis of the public debt threshold effect on output growth in Nigeria. Econ World Paris Proceeding, July 25-28, 2017.
Eze, O. M., Nweke, A. M., & Atunma, E. (2019). Public Debt and Nigeria’s Economic Growth. Journal of Economics and Finance, 10(3): 24-40, 2019.
Facchini, F., and Melki, M. (2011). Optimal government size and economic growth in France (1871- 2008): An explanation by the state and market failures. Documents de travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne.
Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2: 111-120.
Greenidge, K., Craigwell, R., Thomas, C., & Drakes, L. (2012). Threshold effects of sovereign debt: evidence from the Caribbean. IMF Working Paper WP/12/157.
Grenade, K., & Wright, A. (2014). Determining optimal public debt and debt growth dynamics in the Caribbean. Research in Applied Economics, 6(2).
Hassan, M., & Akhter, T. (2012). Impact of public debt burden on economic growth: evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Finance and Banking, 10(2).
Ikudaisi A., Akin-Olagunju, O., Babatunde, A., Irhivben, B., & Okoruwa, V. (2015). Nigerian debt portfolio and its implication on economic growth. Journal of Economic and Sustainable Development, 6(18): 8799.
Kiprotich, N. H., & Maingi, J. (2018). The Non-linear effect of high and growing external debt on Kenya’s economy. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(11): 41-57.
Koustoyiannis, A. (1979). Modern microeconomics. Macmillian Press Ltd.
Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang, Journal of Development Economics, 29 (11): 253–68.
Muhdi, L., & Sasaki, K. (2009). Roles of external and domestic debt in economy: analysis of a macro econometric model for Indonesia. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 15: 251-265.
Mupunga, N., & Roux, L. P. (2015). Estimating the optimal growth- maximising public debt threshold for Zimbabwe. Southern African Business Review. 19 (3): 102-128.
Ogunmuyiwa, M. S. (2011). Does external debt promote economic growth? Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, 3(1): 29 – 35.
Omotosho, B. S., Bawa S., & Doguwa, S. I. (2016). Determining the optimal public debt threshold for Nigeria. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics. 7 (2): 1-25.
Osum

In-Text Citation:
To Cite this Article: Mary, F. M., Sunday, K. E., Haruna, A. T. (2019). Optimal Government Debt and Economic Performance in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 8(3), 67–79.