ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Writing is an important skill, which must be mastered to effectively transfer ideas and thoughts in the form of written language. However, the skill is considered as the most difficult skill to be mastered by English as second language learners. Thus, this study is developed to examine the use of i-THINK map (tree map) in organising ideas in argumentative writing. The study used a quasi-experimental design to collect the data and did not use the control group for comparison. The participants of the study comprised 40 form four students from a sub-urban National Secondary School in Bandar Baru Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia. They were required to sit for pre- and post-test to observe their writing performance. An intervention during the pre-writing stage is applied to promote organisation of ideas in argumentative writing by using i-THINK map as a tool. The findings of the paired sample t-test revealed the statistically significant improvement of students' ability in organisation of ideas in argumentative writing. It is hoped that the findings of the study would be useful to the teachers incorporating i-THINK maps in teaching to promote students' writing skills. It is recommended that future study should emphasise on examining the use of i-THINK map in the organisation of ideas in different type of writing as well.
Al-Shaer, Ibrahim, M. R. (2014). "Employing Concept Mapping As A Pre-Writing
Strategy To Help EFL Learners Better Generate Argumentative Compositions." International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol 8 (2): 1-29.
Hillocks, G. J. (1986). Research on writing composition: New direction for teaching.
Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.
Ka-kan-dee, M., & Kaur, S. (2015). Teaching Strategies Used by Thai EFL
Lecturers to Teach Argumentative Writing. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. 208: 143-156
Malaysian Examinations Council. (2016). Laporan Peperiksaan STPM & MUET.
Retrieved May 18, 2019. From the World Wide Web
http://www.mpm.com.my.
Mekheimer, M. (2005). Effects of Internet-based Instruction, using Webquesting and
Emailing on Developing Some Essay Writing Skills in Student Teachers. Unpublished PhD, Cairo University.
Negari, G. M. (2011). A Study on Strategy Instruction and EFL Learners’ Writing Skill.
International Journal of English Linguistics. 1(2): 299- 307.
Rao, Z. (2007). Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal,
61 (2): 100-106.
Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorow-
Smirnov, Liliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics 2(1): 21-33.
Shakoori, M., & Kadivar, P. (2015). A study on concept mapping as a pre-writing
strategy and examining its effect on EFL learners’ writing achievement and
interest. International Journal of Review in Life Sciences 5 (3), 1040-1044.
Retrieved from http://www.ijiet.org/vol7/894-T004.pdf
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality
(Complete Samples). Biometrika 52 (3/4): 591-611
Somers, A. J. (2015). The Graphic Organizer and Extended Thinking: Florida
Department of Education.
Tayib, A. (2016). The effect of using graphic organizers on writing (A case study of
preparatory college students at Umm-Al-Qura University. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4 (5): 31-53. http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Effect-Of-Using-GraphicOrganizers-On-Writing1.pdf
Wise, R. (2014). How to Use Graphic Organizers to Improve Reading Comprehension,
Writing, Listening, Note Taking and Study Skills: Journal for EducationBehaviour.com. East Carolina University, 2014.
Yunus, M. M., & Chan, H. C. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in
Malaysian University English Test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 7: 619-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.74064
In-Text Citation: (Fadhil & Yamat, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Fadhil, F., & Yamat, H. (2020). I-Think Map in Organization of Ideas in Argumentative Writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(1), 82–92.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode