ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
R.O. Winstedt is an orientalist serving in Malaya as a British administrator. His form of thinking is founded by logical empirical of positivism; a philosophy utilizes ne plus ultra of reason as the primary degree to obtain exact truths based on systematic and thorough research methods. The philosophy declines to prove a fact acquired by revelation because it is considered irrelevant in historical verification. is focused on the analysis of Winstedt's notion of Islamic Criminal laws in Malaya indeed the orientalist approach in evaluating Islam and Malay and how far the acceptance of Islamic criminal law in the legal tradition of the Malay community. The writers apply historiography, comparing and content analyzing methodologies in this study. The findings suggest that orientalist thinking approaches, particularly Winstedt, have shown a debatable point of view and biased judgment in evaluating Islam i.e. the legal system. Winstedt believes Islamic laws and customary should not be mutually enforced because of the former is intolerable practices in Malaya on cultural and residential dichotomy. The notion is due to orientalists’ shortcomings in understanding Islamic teaching in fact as a result of European-centric thinking. The thought assembles Europe as a great and civilized nation compared to other races, so-called the ambassador of civilization who are the savior of the nation that ought to be civilized.
Lughod, L. A. (2001). Orientalism and Middle East Feminist Studies. Feminist Studies, 27(1): 101-113.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1978). Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: ABIM.
Elias, A. (2012). Kecenderungan Paksi India: Implikasinya Terhadap Pensejarahan Islam di Alam Melayu. In Ismail, M.Z. & Abdullah, W.S.W. (Eds.). Adab dan Peradaban: Karya Pengi`tirafan untuk Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. Petaling Jaya: MPH Group Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
Fang, L. Y. (1976). Undang-Undang Melaka. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Ferman, G. S., & Levin, J. (1975). Social Sciences Research. Amerika Syarikat: John Wisley & Sons.
Goldziher, I. (1981). Introduction to Islamic Theology and Law. (Andras & Ruth, H., Terj.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Halimi, A. J. (2007). Pengaruh Islam Terhadap Perundangan Melayu: Tumpuan Kepada Undang-undang 99 Perak. In Zain, F.M. (Ed.). Islam di Tanah Melayu Abad ke-19. Shah Alam: Karisma Publications Sdn Bhd.
Ibrahim, A., & Joned, A. (2005). Sistem Undang-Undang di Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
Joesoef, S. H. M. (1985). Orientalisme dan Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Rahman, M. F. A., Aziz, N. H., Ahmat, A. C., Yusuf@Salleh, M. Y., & Rahim, R. A. A. (2016). A Doctrinal Aspect of Orientalism and its Influences of Malay Culture. Journal e-Academia. 5(2): 58-65.
Rahman, M. F. A., Aziz, N. H., Kadir, N. A. A., & Aris, N. F. M. (2017). Orientalist Studies Verge on Islam: Early History. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 7(12): 1246-1256.
Rahman, M. F. A., Razak, M. I. A., Noor, A. F. M., Basir, M. K. A., & Khalid, N. K. (2019). Kedudukan Perundangan Jenayah Islam dan Adat ke atas Masyarakat Melayu di Tanah Melayu Menurut Pandangan Orientalis: Rujukan Khusus Terhadap R.O. Winstedt. Jurnal `Ulwan. 4(1): 86-99.
Rahman, M. F. A., Razak, M. I. A., Noor, A. F. M., Basir, M. K. A., & Khalid, N. K. (2019). Analysing Stages of the Western Orientalists’ Approach towards Islam. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 9(9): 979-989.
Rigby, J. (1908). The Ninety-nine Laws of Perak. In Wilkinson, R.J. (Ed.). Papers on Malay Subjects: Law Part 1. Kuala Lumpur: Government of the Federated Malay State.
Said, E. W. (1977). Orientalism. London: Penguin.
Spuler, B. (1960). The Muslim World: A Historical Survey. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Swettenham, F. (1893). About Perak. Singapura: Straits Times Press.
Swettenham, F. (2005). Perihal Orang Melayu. (Zubaidah, I., Terj.). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.
Umar, A. M. (1978). Orientalisme dan Kajian Tentang Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Wilkinson, R. J. (1908). Papers on Malay Subjects: Law Part 1. Kuala Lumpur: Government of the Federated Malay State.
Winstedt, R. O. (1961). The Malays: A Cultural History. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Winstedt, R. O. (1969). A History of Classical Malay Literature. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Winstedt, R. O. (1988). A History of Malaya. Kuala Lumpur: Marican & Sons.
Yan, C. Y. (2009). Colonial Image of Malay Adat Laws: A Critical Appraisal of Studies on Adat Laws in the Malay Peninsula during the Colonial Era and Some Continuities by Noor Aisha Abdul Rahman. New Era College Academic Journal. v. 6.
In-Text Citation: (Rahman et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Rahman, M. F. A., Razak, M. I. A., Noor, A. F. M., Basir, M. K. A., Khalid, N. K., & Kadir, N. A. A. (2020). R.O. Winstedt’ Notion on Islamic Criminal Laws in Malaya: An Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 91–101.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode