ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Death penalty is the most extreme punishment for a crime and has been berated as heartless and barbaric. Nations implementing death penalty are scorned upon and pressured to replace death penalty with more humane punishment. Although drug trafficking in Malaysia is punishable by death, there is no guarantee that all accused persons charged for drug trafficking will be hanged to death. Judges in Malaysia are extremely cautious in meting out death penalty and would only do so in the absence of reasonable doubt. This paper examines drug trafficking cases reported over two decades to ascertain whether Malaysia has liberally executed death penalty on drug traffickers. Empirical analysis supported by doctrinal research was carried out on drug trafficking cases reported in three leading law journals in Malaysia from 1991 to 2012. Analysis of the cases on drug trafficking in Malaysia revealed that a significant number of cases were concluded with the acquittal of the accused persons. While enforcing death penalty is not arbitrarily done, acquittals in drug trafficking cases are indicative of need for improvements.
Malik, A. I. (2000). Drug Legislation in Malaysia. Current Law Journal, 3, 81-82
Malik, A. I. (2001). Drug Laws and Ramifications of Drugs Activities in Asean Nations - A Synopsis. Current Law Journal, 4 , 41-43
Malik, A. I. (2009). Human Rights and The Malaysian Judicial System. Current Law Journal, 2, xxi.
Abdullah, H. (2009). Criminal Trial Advocacy for the Defence. Johor Baru, Malaysia: Hisham Bin Abdullah @Teh Poh Teik.
Abdullah, H. (2006) . The Law on Drugs Possession and Trafficking in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Marsden Law Book.
Blackstone, W. (1975). The Commentaries on the Laws of England. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
Clarkson, C., Keating, H., & Cunningham, S. (2007). Clarkson and Keating Criminal Law: Text and Materials. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Edwin, C. (1998). Beyond Reasonable Doubt: The Golden Thread Weakened? Current Law Journal, 1, i -iii.
Nini, F. D. (2006). The Standard of Proof at the Close Prosecution's Case: Is the Question Finally Resolved?. Current Law Journal, 3, lxxxv.
Mooi, H. C. (2007). Sentencing Practice in Malaysia. Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Sweet & Maxwell. Asia.
Kamaruddin, A. R. (2007). The Misuuse of Drugs in Malaysia: Past and Present. Jurnal Anti Dadah Malaysia (Malaysian Anti-Drugs Journal), 1 (2), 1-24.
Khaira, H. S. (2005). Sentencing of Drug Offenders (A Comparative Study of the Australian and Malaysian Approach). Malayan Law Journal, 3, lxxvii.
Kwai, M. W. (1981). Should Death Penalty Be Abolished? Current Law Journal, 1, 25-27.
Hanum, N. A. M. (2006). Should Death Sentence be Abolished?. Malayan Law Journal, 3, cxliii.
House of Representatives Parliamentary Debate. (1983). March 24 Debate. 2nd and 3rd Reading of the Dangerous Drugs (Amendment) Act, 7404-7460.
Rubin, M. (1996). Standard of Proof Relating to Sufficiency of Evidence at Criminal Trial : Mental Gymnastic Since Haw Tua Tau. Current Law Journal, 2, lxiv.
Sydney, L. H. (1991). Death, Drugs and Development : Malaysia's Mandatory Death Penalty for Traffickers and International War on drugs. Colombia Journal, 365 - 405.
Teoh, K. C. (2003). The Deterrence Effect of Mandotary Death Sentence in Drug Cases in Malaysia. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Vijayandran, T. (2012). Mens rea Posession. Malayan Law Journal, 6 , lxiv.
In-Text Citation: (Nasrijal et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Nasrijal, N. M. H., Joni, E. K. E., & Talib, A. N. (2020). Death Penalty for Drug Trafficking Cases in Malaysia: Theory vs Reality. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(3), 533–547.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode