ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Introducing uncertainty into instruction-based classroom has been looked into by some educators to increase students’ learning in terms of problem solving skills. In Problem-based learning (PBL) environment, uncertainty is naturally incorporated into the ill-structured problem which is crafted purposively to motivate and stimulate PBL learners’ learning process as the natural provocation for real learning. This study adopts the quasi-experimental approach and correlational design to explore the relationship between PBL learners’ uncertainty level and learning performance and the effectiveness of an authentic problem-based learning (APBL) model in reducing uncertainty level. 78 Physics students from Taylor’s American Degree Program in Fall 2017 semester participated in this study. A 30-item self-reporting, numerically measurable questionnaire to capture the learners’ uncertainty level with regards to the cognitive, affective and physical dimension was developed. A pre-test on the uncertainty level was conducted to some students who have volunteered to fill out the questionnaire immediately after they learned the PBL scenario which served to determine whether the PBL question has incorporated uncertainty and if there is a reduce in uncertainty level after completing the PBL activities. Posttest on the uncertainty level was conducted after learners presented their solution or proposal to the problem. Learning performance scores constitutes three measures, namely learning satisfaction, learning attitude, and learning score. Learning satisfaction consists of 10-item self-reporting, numerically measurable questionnaire. The Cronbach’s alphas for uncertainty construct and learning satisfaction are 0.89 and 0.92 respectively. One sample T test was conducted to study the effectiveness of APBL in reducing the level of uncertainty. A Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the variables were obtained. The results of zero order correlation analysis showed a strong negative correlation between uncertainty level and learning performance. One sample t-test result showed that learners’ uncertainty level were significantly reduced after the APBL activities.
Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Inviting uncertainty into the classroom. Educational Leadership, 75, 20 - 25.
Cynthia, L. S. (2015). The futures of learning 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? Education, Research and Foresight, Working paper, 15
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q., 13: 319-340. DOI: 10.2307/249008
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004) “Problem-based learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review, 16(3):235-266.
Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., McCarthy, G. (2005). Decisions under uncertainty: probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. J. Neurosci. 25, 3304–331110.1523/JNEUROSCI.5070-04.2005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Johnson, B. (2011). EDUTOPIA. Helping Students Deal with Uncertainty in the Classroom.
Lee, V. S. (1998). The uses of uncertainty in the college classroom. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 12(1). Fort Collins, CO: POD Network in Higher Education.
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In Wilson, B. (eds.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Schmidt, G., Rotgans, J., and Yew, E. (2011) “The process of problem-based learning: what works and why”. Medical Education, 45(8):792-806.
Tauritz, R. (2012). How to handle knowledge uncertainty? Learning and teaching in times of accelerating change. In: Learning for Sustainability in times of accelerating change. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Van Asselt, M. (2000) Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk. The Prima Approach to Decision Support. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Visser, J., and Visser, Y. L. (2004) “Ambiguity, cognition, learning, teaching, and design”. TechTrends, 48(1):40-43. Boston: Springer.
Wee, K. N. L. (2004). Jump Start Authentic Problem Based Learning. Singapore: Prentice Hall Pearson Education South Asia Pte. Ltd.
Wee, K. N., Kek, Y. C., Silva, G., and Seah, T. H. (2000). Tried & tested: issues & implications for educators in problem-based learning: relearning from the learners? perspective. Paper presented at the 2nd Asia Pacific conference in Problem-based Learning organised by Temasek Polytechnic, Singapore.
Wilson, T. D. (1999). Model in information behavior research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3): 249-270.
In-Text Citation: (Heng et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Heng, L. K., Ping, L. Y., & Rol, L. K. (2020). Examining Effectiveness of an Authentic Problem-based Learning Model based on Uncertainty Level and Learning Performance of Engineering Students studying Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Science, 10(4), 585–599.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode