ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
2009 was the default year of Malaysian sukuk. It grew larger due to blind market information about defaults, summing up the loss of USD 2.243 billion. Malaysian sukuk market still survived mainly due to petro-dollars and no competition pressure. By 2010, IMF and World Bank were unanimous to say that Malaysia had won the rightly envisioned status of global investment hub. More than 25% of sukuk assets, placed with her and 84% of short term sukuk are in MYR, certainly contributive to her GDP. By 2015 the sukuk market has entered into consolidation phase, with lesser issuances, stark down petroleum prices, sluggish post-crisis economy, down rated MYR, inflation and much higher competitive pressure. Saudi Arabia got IMF support for sukuk and Bahrain doubled its market share in a single year. This time the market forces would not relax Malaysia. Getting lesson from 2009, before the contagion ignites it is the time to check our safety measures against the default. Basing upon the logics drawn from extensive past literature this concept paper sorts the Corporate Governance (CG) and Sustainability (CS) for defensive mechanism against the defaults. Their inter-relation and relation with default risk have been discussed to reach over a conceptualized framework. It was observed that the CG-risk models are alone insufficient to make a plausible conclusion. CS has straightforward defensive role against defaults. But CG is clear to control CS. To say that CG-risk relation is better performed via CS performance. The discussion has been concluded in the managerial implications and directions for future research in the related fields.
Ace Group. (2016). Malaysia says $1.5 billion sukuk oversubscribed. Capital Management.
Akdogu, E., & Alp, A. (2016). Credit risk and governance: Evidence from credit default swap spreads. Finance Research Letters, 17(1), 211–217.
Alam, N., Hassan, M. K., & Haque, M. A. (2013). Are Islamic bonds different from conventional bonds? International evidence from capital market tests. Borsa Istanbul Review, 13(1), 22-29.
Albuquerque, R. A., Durnev, A., & Koskinen, Y. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence. ECGI.
Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., & Khan, S. (2012). Governance-default risk relationship and the demand for intermediated and non-intermediated debt. Australiasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 6(1), 25–42.
Alqahtani, D. S. (2009). Global Islamic Index Providers: The Wrong Choice. The Journal of Investing, 79-81.
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433 - 448.
Ben Zeineb, G., & Mensi, S. (2018). Corporate governance, risk and efficiency: evidence from GCC Islamic banks. Managerial Finance, 44(5), 551-569.
Benlemlih, M., Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2018). Environmental and social disclosures and firm risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 613-626.
Bhagat, Bolton, B., & Romano, R. (2008). The Promise and Peril of Corporate Governance Indices. Columbia Law review, 108(8), 1803-1882.
Bhagat, S., & Black, B. S. (2002). The Non-Correlation Between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 231-273.
BNM. (2015). Global Sukuk Report 1Q 2015. Malaysia World’s Islamic Finance Marketplace.
Cao, Z., Leng, F., Feroz, E. H., & Davalos, S. V. (2015). Corporate governance and default risk of firms cited in the SEC’s Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 44(1), 113–138.
Carroll, A. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Chen, H. (2008). The timescale effects of corporate governance measure on predicting financial distress. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 11(1), 35–46.
Chen, K. C., Chen, Z., & Wei, K. C. (2011). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow and the Effect of Shareholder Rights on the Implied Cost of Equity Capital . Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(1), 171-207.
Colan, A. (2017). Running Musharakah; Discussions & Dialogues at Islamic Economic Forum. (K. Hasani, Interviewer)
Core, J., Guay, W., & Rusticus, T. (2006). Does weak governance cause weak stock returns? An examination of firm operating performance and investors’ expectations. Journal of Finance, 61(1), 655–687.
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1994). Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1603-1617.
El Haloui, M., & Aboulaich, R. (2019). Leveraged buyout booms and busts: can Islamic finance help prevent and mitigate such market distortions? Investment Management & Financial Innovations, 16(1), 299-318.
Elhaj, M. A., Muhamed, N. A., Ramli, N. M., & Zakaria, N. B. (2016). Ownership monitoring mechanism over sukuk credit rating. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(12), 2222-6990.
El-Khatib, H., & Patel, Z. (2009). Risk Management. Risk Management: Islamic Economic and Islamic EthicoLegal Perspectives on the Current Financial Crisis (pp. 1-26). London, UK: Islamic Finance Project Harvard Law School Islamic Legal Studies Program, London School of Economic.
Fahlenbrach, R., & Stulz, R. M. (2011). Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisis. Journal of financial economics, 99(1), 11-26.
Fich, E. M., & Slezak, S. L. (2008). Can corporate governance save distressed firms from bankruptcy? An empirical analysis. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 30(2), 225-251.
Godlewski, C. J.
In-Text Citation: (Rehman et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Rehman, A. U., Zaidel, M. A. bin, Jais, M. bin, & Malik, A. H. (2020). Sukuk Default: Could Corporate Governance & Sustainability be the Defenders? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 533–545.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode