ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
Studies have revealed that the “baby boomers” generation has a lower level of intention to quit as compared to Generation X and Generation Y. Meanwhile, Generation Z has a higher level of intention to quit than Generation Y although the former has gained abundant support from the relevant organisations. Addressing that, this concept paper focuses on the relationship between multi-generation and the intention to quit working. The emphasis on personality and psychological behaviour of this multi-generation are reflected in social exchange that values work based on the influence of each generation concept. This study will specifically discuss social exchange theory, organisational support theory, and the conceptual model of the relationship between multi-generation and intention to quit working. This concept paper provides valuable contribution to the existing knowledge base, especially on how multi-generation plays a role in affecting the intention to quit in an organisation. The implications and recommendations for future research are also discussed.
Ahmad. (2016). Performance Appraisal System for Organisation. Sarawak: UNIMAS Publisher.
Ahmad, R. (2011). Pengurusan dan penilaian prestasi pekerja (1st Editio; S. RS Publication, Kuching, ed.). Kuching,Sarawak: InfoGrafik Press Sdn.Bhd.
Aladwan, K., Bhanugopan, R., & Fish, A. (2013). Why do employees jump ship? Examining intent to quit employment in a non-western cultural context. Employee Relations, 35(4), 408–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2012-0027
Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen)Me: Limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.001
Andrade, M. S., & Westover, J. H. (2018). Generational differences in work quality characteristics and job satisfaction. Evidence-Based HRM, 6(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-03-2018-0020.
Bell, J. A. (2013). Five generations in the nursing workforce: Implications for nursing professional development. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 29(4), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0b013e31829aedd4.
Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T., Catley, B., Blackwood, K., Roche, M., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (2019). Factors influencing leave intentions among older workers: a moderated-mediation model. Personnel Review, 48(4), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2018-0095.
Bontekoning, A. (2019). About Generation Itself as a Radical Social Change – A Chapter Not Written by Julián Marías Aguilera ?. Generations Z in Europe, (1949), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-491-120191009.
Burns, T. (1973). A Structural Theory of Social Exchange. Acta Sociologica, 16(3), 188–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169937301600303.
Burton, C. M., Mayhall, C., Cross, J., & Patterson, P. (2019). Critical elements for multigenerational teams: a systematic review. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 25(7/8), 369–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-12-2018-0075.
Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810904385.
Chang, Wang, & Huang. (2013). Work design–related antecedents of turnover intention: A Multilevel Approach. 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.
Chicca, J., & Shellenbarger, T. (2018). Connecting with Generation Z: Approaches in Nursing Education 1, 2. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(3), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.008.
Chillakuri, B., & Mahanandia, R. (2018). Generation Z entering the workforce: the need for sustainable strategies in maximizing their talent. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(4), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/HRMID-01-2018-0006.
Coomes, M. D., & Debard, R. (2004). A Generational Approach to Understanding Students Understanding Individuals and Groups. (106), 5–16.
Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Diehl, M.-R. (2018). Social Exchange Theory. The Routledge Companion to Trust, (11531), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745572-14.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An Interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602.
Deloitte. (2018). Millennials disappointed in business, unprepared for Industry 4.0. JLTA Journal, 21(0), 0. https://doi.org/10.20622/jltajournal.21.0_0.
Eberhardt, D. (2017). Generation Z Goes to College: An Opportunity to Reflect on Contemporary Traditional College Students. Journal of College and Character, 18(3), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587x.2017.1338583.
Elizur, D. (1984). Facets of work values: A structural analysis of work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.379.
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, 197–
In-Text Citation: (Francis et al., 2020)
To Cite this Article: Francis, B. R., Ahmad, R. bin, & Abdullah, S. M. (2020). The Relationship between Multi-Generation and Intention to Quit Working. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 936–951.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode