Journal Screenshot

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

Open Access Journal

ISSN: 2222-6990

Selection a New Mobile Phone by Utilize the Voting Method, AHP and Enhance TOPSIS

Abdulhadi Qays Abdulhadi

http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i8/7621

Open access

The most important expansions in the arenas of information technology and communication are mobile phones. Many brands of mobile phones existing in the market that make the decision of buying a new mobile phone a very difficult choice. The objective of this study is to estimate the mobile phone selections regarding human preferences (Customer) by utilizing the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. The most necessary criteria prefer and effect on the selection of decision-makers are determined by utilized voting method while the voters are presented the perspectives of the 25 student’s from UPSI (Sultan Idris Education University). Additional, AHP ( analytical hierarchy process) is used to define the weights of assessment criteria then the enhance TOPSIS (Techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution) is utilized to rank the mobile phone alternatives.

Abdulhadi, A. Q. (2019). Review of Hybrid TOPSIS with other Methods.
Alaa, M., Albakri, I. S. M. A., Singh, C. K. S., Hammed, H., Zaidan, A., Zaidan, B., . . . Almahdi, E. (2019). Assessment and ranking framework for the English skills of pre-service teachers based on fuzzy Delphi and TOPSIS methods. IEEE access, 7, 126201-126223.
Bao, X., Qu, Q., Dong, Y., Wang, Y., & Sheng, X. (2015). Risk evaluation of value assessment in IPR pledge financing based on interval value TOPSIS method. Paper presented at the Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS), 2015 International Conference on.
Chu, J., & Su, Y. (2012). The application of TOPSIS method in selecting fixed seismic shelter for evacuation in cities. Systems Engineering Procedia, 3, 391-397.
Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., & Dadeliene, R. (2014). Multi-criteria assessment and ranking system of sport team formation based on objective-measured values of criteria set. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(14), 6106-6113.
Davie, R., Panting, C., & Charlton, T. (2004). Mobile phone ownership and usage among pre-adolescents. Telematics and Informatics, 21(4), 359-373.
Dewi, R. K., Mentari, M., Saputro, W., Nugroho, U. A., & Hibatullah, M. H. (2019). Usability Analysis of TOPSIS based Mobile Recommender System of Malang Tourism. Paper presented at the 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology (SIET).
Fasanghari, M., Kamalabadi, I. N., & Mirzaei, A. H. (2008). IT based supply chain agility evaluation using a new TOPSIS with interval data. Paper presented at the Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 2008. ICCIT'08. Third International Conference on.
Fu, C., Yang, S., & Lu, W. (2007). An extended TOPSIS for belief group decision making. Paper presented at the Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2007. FSKD 2007. Fourth International Conference on.
Funk, J. L. (2005). The future of the mobile phone Internet: an analysis of technological trajectories and lead users in the Japanese market. Technology in Society, 27(1), 69-83.
Gangurde, S., & Akarte, M. (2010). Ranking of product alternatives based on customer-designer preferences. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2010 IEEE International Conference on.
Guo-feng, W., & Li-wen, C. (2010). Construction project bidding risk assessment model based on rough set-TOPSIS. Paper presented at the Information Engineering (ICIE), 2010 WASE International Conference on.
Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Tikniouine, A., & Agouti, T. (2016). Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1.
Hao, H., Zhao, S., Liu, Z., & Zhao, F. (2016). Evaluating human resource competitiveness based on an improved TOPSIS method: The case of automotive industry. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2016 IEEE International Conference on.
Haverila, M. (2011). Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repurchase intent among male users. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 19(4), 238-246.
He, Y., & Jung, H. (2018). A Voting TOPSIS Approach for Determining the Priorities of Areas Damaged in Disasters. Sustainability, 10(5), 1607.
Hsu, L.-C., Ou, S.-L., & Ou, Y.-C. (2015). A Comprehensive performance evaluation and ranking methodology under a sustainable development perspective. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(1), 74-92.
Hu, J., Du, Y., Mo, H., Wei, D., & Deng, Y. (2016). A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 444, 73-85.
I??klar, G., & Büyüközkan, G. (2007). Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 29(2), 265-274.
Jackson, L. A., Zhao, Y., Kolenic III, A., Fitzgerald, H. E., Harold, R., & Von Eye, A. (2008). Race, gender, and information technology use: The new digital divide. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), 437-442.
Jahan, A., Bahraminasab, M., & Edwards, K. (2012). A target-based normalization technique for materials selection. Materials & Design, 35, 647-654.
Kaabi, H., & Jabeur, K. (2015). TOPSIS using a mixed subjective-objective criteria weights for ABC inventory classification. Paper presented at the Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), 2015 15th International Conference on.
Lahby, M., Cherkaoui, L., & Adib, A. (2013). An enhanced-TOPSIS based network selection technique for next generation wireless networks. Paper presented at the Telecommunications (ICT), 2013 20th International Conference on.
Lee, Y. S., Hong, S. W., Smith-Jackson, T. L., Nussbaum, M. A., & Tomioka, K. (2006). Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 18(2), 304-325.
Ma, Q., Zheng, J., Zhang, S., & Zhou, W. (2016). Feature evaluation for mobile phone changing based on large-scale user behavioral data. Paper presented at the 2016 8th International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing (WCSP).
Mohamed, L., Leghris, C., & Abdellah, A. (2011). A hybrid approach for network selection in heterogeneous multi-access environments. Paper presented at the New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), 2011 4th IFIP International Conference on.
Ouenniche, J., Pérez-Gladish, B., & Bouslah, K. (2018). An out-of-sample framework for TOPSIS-based classifiers with application in bankruptcy prediction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 111-116.
Pérez-Fernández, R., Rademaker, M., Alonso, P., Díaz, I., Montes, S., & De Baets, B. (2016). Representations of votes facilitating monotonicity-based ranking rules: From votrix to votex. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 73, 87-107.
Qader, M., Zaidan, B., Zaidan, A., Ali, S., Kamaluddin, M., & Radzi, W. (2017). A methodology for football players selection problem based on multi-measurements criteria analysis. Measurement, 111, 38-50.
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26.
Senouci, M. A., Hoceini, S., & Mellouk, A. (2016). Utility function-based TOPSIS for network interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Paper presented at the Communications (ICC), 2016 IEEE International Conference on.
Senouci, M. A., Mushtaq, M. S., Hoceini, S., & Mellouk, A. (2016). TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection. Computer Networks.
Sheng-mei, L., Su, P., & Ming-hai, X. (2010). An improved TOPSIS vertical handoff algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. Paper presented at the Communication Technology (ICCT), 2010 12th IEEE International Conference on.
Shieh, L.-F., Chang, T.-H., Fu, H.-P., Lin, S.-W., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2014). Analyzing the factors that affect the adoption of mobile services in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 80-88.
Van Biljon, J., Kotzé, P., & Renaud, K. (2008). Mobile phone usage of young adults: the impact of motivational factors. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat.
Wang, P., Zhu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design. Information Sciences, 345, 27-45.
Wang, X. (2009). Comprehensive Evaluation on E-commerce Website Applying Improved TOPSIS Method. Paper presented at the Electronic Commerce and Business Intelligence, 2009. ECBI 2009. International Conference on.
Weinberger, Z., & Richter, E. (2002). Cellular telephones and effects on the brain: the head as an antenna and brain tissue as a radio receiver. Medical Hypotheses, 59(6), 703-705.
Wilska, T. (2003). The role of m-services in the well-being of young people. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), 441-463.
Wu, C.-R., Lin, C.-T., & Lin, Y.-F. (2009). Selecting the preferable bancassurance alliance strategic by using expert group decision technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 3623-3629.
Wu, W., Kou, G., & Peng, Y. (2012). Credit risk evaluation by improved MCDM models. Paper presented at the Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (BIFE), 2012 Fifth International Conference on.
Wu, Y.-L., & Zhu, X.-Y. (2011). TOPSIS-based synthetic evaluation method for customer satisfaction. Paper presented at the Business Management and Electronic Information (BMEI), 2011 International Conference on.
Zaidan, B., & Zaidan, A. (2017). Comparative Study on the Evaluation and Benchmarking Information Hiding Approaches Based Multi-Measurement Analysis Using TOPSIS Method with Different Normalisation, Separation and Context Techniques. Measurement.

In-Text Citation: (Abdulhadi, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Abdulhadi, A. Q. (2020). Selection a New Mobile Phone by Utilize the Voting Method, AHP and Enhance TOPSIS. International Journal Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(8), 717-732.