ISSN: 2222-6990
Open access
The amount of unuseful contents, such as hoaxes or false news, and non-educational content bring negative impact to the society, especially to the students. People who were influenced by hoaxes and non-educational digital content from the news and various digital contents, responded by writing negative comments on digital media. By utilizing digital literacy, it will contribute positive conduct in responding various digital content, for example being educated with positive content and contributing to the society by creating qualify digital content. Because of this reason, a digital content model contains social science education is needed as a media literacy to educate students and to digital society in general.
High quality of digital content has certain standards so that it will bring positive influence when it is distributed in digital media. Digital contents are not just the process of digitizing traditional content into digital media. Furthe more, various parameters of digital content, such as: Search Engine Optimization, writing mechanism, knowledge, social studies competency, digital media and digital copyright are part of the fundamental elements of qualify digital content models, which is built using transdisciplinary knowledge.
Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, C. M. (1993). Media literacy: a report of the National Leadership. In Conference on Media Literacy, the Aspen Institute Wye Center, Queenstown Maryland.
Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
Considine, D. (2002). Putting the ME in media literacy. Middle Ground, 15-21.
Davis, C. H., & Shaw, D. (Eds.). (2011). Introduction to information science and technology. American Society for Information Science and Technology.
Flew, T. (2002). Beyond ad hocery: defining creative industries. In Cultural Sites, Cultural Theory, Cultural Policy, The Second International Conference on Cultural Policy Research.
Hobbs, R. (1998). Building citizenship skills through media literacy education. The public voice in a democracy at risk, 57-76.
Kubey, R. W. (2003). Why US media education lags behind the rest of the English-speaking world. Television & New Media, 4(4), 351-370.
Lankshear, C. J., & Knobel, M. (2008). Introduction: Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang Publishing.
Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “digital society”. Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices, 30, 151-176.
Riel, J., Christian, S., & Hinson, B. (2012). Charting digital literacy: A framework for information technology and digital skills education in the community college. Available at SSRN 2781161.
Sulianta, F. (2018). Panduan Lengkap Pengembangan Softskill Interpersonal dan Intrapersonal Skill. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Toffler, A. (1970). The fractured family. Future Shock, New York: Random House, 211-30.
Tompkins, G. E., and K Hoskisson, K. (1991). Language Arts: Content and Teaching Strategies. New York: Max Well Macmillan Internationaal Publishing Group.
In-Text Citation: (Sulianta, Sapriya, Supriatna, Disman, 2020)
To Cite this Article: Sulianta, F., Sapriya., Supriatna, N., Disman., (2020). Digital Content Model of Social Study Education in User Generated Content Platform as A Media Literacy to Educate Students and Cyber Society.
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 10(8), 1084-1092.
Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s)
Published by HRMARS (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode