ISSN: 2308-0876
NOTE: THIS JOURNAL IS SHIFTED TO NEW
WEBSITE (www.kwpublications.com)
Open access
Bantu languages are known for their agglutinative nature and complex verbal morphology. A single verbal complex has several affixes including the subject markers (SMs) and object markers (OMs). The precise status of the SMs and OMs in Bantu remains unresolved. These markers have been analysed as agreement markers in some languages while in others, they are analysed as incorporated pronominals and in other languages as clitics. The objective of this paper is to determine whether these markers should be analysed as agreement markers, incorporated pronominals or clitics in EkeGusii. Findings reveal that the SM is an agreement marker when the overt lexical subject Determiner Phrase (DP) co-occurs with the SM and an incorporated pronoun in null subject constructions. Accordingly, the paper posits that the SM is both an agreeement marker and an incorporated pronominal in EkeGusii. The OM is an incorporated pronominal because the doubling of the OM and the corresponding lexical DP is not licensed in EkeGusii. In analysing the status of SMs and OMs, the morphological and syntactic evidence provided shows that these markers are more of affixes than clitics in this language.
Basweti, N. O., Achola, E. A., Barasa, D., & Michira, J. N. (2015). Ekegusii DP and its Sentential Symmetry: A Minimalist Inquiry. In International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol 2, No 2, 93-107.
Black, C. A. (1999). A step-by-step introduction to the government and binding theory. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Bresnan, J., & Mchombo, S. (1987). Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63: 741-782.
Buell, L. C. (2005). Issues in Zulu verbal morphosyntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California: Los Angeles.
Diercks, M., & Sikuku, J. (2013). Object clitics in a Bantu language: deriving pronominal incorporation in Lubukusu. Moi University and Pomona College.
Diercks, M. (2010). Agreement with subjects in Lubukusu. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Georgetown: Washington D.C.
Diercks, M., Ranero R., & Paster, M. (2013). Evidence for a clitic analysis of object markers in Kuria.
Elwell, R. (2008). Finite state methods for bantu verb morphology. CSLI publications.
Halpern, A. (2001). “Clitics” The handbook of morphology. Spencer, Andrew and Arnold M. Zwicky (eds). Blackwell Reference Online.
Haspelmath, M. (2002). Understanding morphology. Oxford University Press: New York.
Holmstedt, R. D. (2012). Clitics.
Iorio, D. E. (2015). Subject and object marking in Bembe. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. University of Newcastle: Newcastle.
Kamil, U. D. (2006). Subject agreement in Nairobi Swahili. Selected Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. John Mugane et al., 225-233. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Kari, E. E. (2002). Distinguishing between clitics and affixes in Degema, Nigeria. African Study Monographs, 23(3): 91-115.
Kari, E. E. (2017). On the Status of Subject Markers in African Languages. Studies in Linguistics 44, 99-134.
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, (2010). 2009 Population and housing highlights. Available at http://www.knbs.or.ke/Census Results/KNBS Brochure.pdf Accessed Sep 3, 2014.
Komenda, S. (2015). The nature of vowel length in Ekegusii: A theoretical account. In International Journal of Education and Research. Vol. 3 No. 9, 1-14.
Kramer, R. (2012). Differentiating agreement and doubled clitics: Object markers in Amharic. Selected Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. Bruce Connell and Nicholas Rolle, 60-70. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Labelle, M. (2008). Pronominal object markers in Bantu and Romance. In De Cat C & Demuth K. (eds). The Romance-Bantu connection. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp 83-109.
Maho, J. (2008). The Bantu bibliography (African linguistic bibliography). Koln: Rudiger Koppe Verlag.
Ngonyani, D. S. (2006). Resumptive pronominal clitics in Bantu languages. Selected Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference on African Linguistics, ed. Olaoba F. Arasanyin and Michael A. Pemberton, 51-59 MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Nurse, D., & Phillippson, G. (1980). Bantu Languages of East Africa. In E. C. Polomé & C. P. Hill (Eds.), Language in Tanzania (pp. 26-67). London: Oxford University Press.
Nyakoe, D., Ongarora, D., & Oloo, P. (2014). An analysis of the food metaphor in EkeGusii HIVand AIDS discourse. In: International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. Vol. 4. No.1, 221-228.
Ogechi, N. O. (2002). Trilingual codeswiching in Kenya- Evidence from Ekegusii, Kiswahili, English and Sheng. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. Hamburg
Ogechi, N. O. (2006). Language and its usage in J.S. Akama & R.,Maxon (eds), Ethnography of the Gusii of Western Kenya: A Vanishing Cultural Heritage. New York: The Edwin Press Limited.
Ongarora, D. O. (2008). Bantu morphosyntax: A study of EkeGusii. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Riedel, K. (2009). The syntax of object marking in Sambaa. A comparative Bantu perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Sozinho, M., & Mbiavanga, F. (2008) A preliminary exploration of verbal affix ordering in Kikongo, a Bantu language of Angola. In Language Matters: Studies in the languages of Africa, 39:2,332-358, DOI 10.1080/10228190802596589.
Zeller, J. (2007). On the subject marker in Kinyarwanda. Selected proceedings in Annual Conference of the Linguistic Society of Southern Africa in Potchefstroom.
Zeller, J. (2012). Object marking in Zulu. Durban: University of KwaZulu – Natal.
Zwicky, A. & Pullum, G. (1983). Cliticization vs inflection: English n’t. Language 59, 502-513.
In-Text Citation: (Mboga, Ondondo & Ongarora, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Mboga, J. M., Ondondo, E. A., & Ongarora, D. O. (2019). Ekegusii Subject And Object Markers: Affixes or Clitics? Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1–19.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode